Jump to content

King of the Ring PPV scrapped


Recommended Posts

Guest teke184
Posted
Well, look at the bright side. Unless they give up booking an undercard, they can't screw the midcard any more.

JHawk, look at the lineup for Wrestlemania. Just about the only people on it are considered main eventers or upper midcarders (Jericho, Booker, Benoit, Eddy, etc.).

 

If I were them I'd be pissed at missing out on a Wrestlemania check after taking it up the ass from the WWE office all year. They've had their guarantees slashed through intimidation, there are less spots on house shows and the houses are down due to management stupidity, etc. etc. etc.

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest RenegadeX28
Posted

Well, another WWE trademark bites the dust.........

Guest El Satanico
Posted

It's not like WWe uses the format properly anymore so why keep it..

 

Besides it's not like they can't run a tourney on some other PPV. If Vince said "I'd like to have a tournament" they could still do it.

 

Basically there was no point in keeping KOTR alive.

Guest Space_Cowboy
Posted

I haven't reallyy cared much at all for the Tournament over the last few years, so the WWE dumping it doesn't overly bother me. Just one less thing for them to screw up with their idiotic booking i guess.

Guest mach7
Posted

Wow, Vinnie Mac really has a hate-on for tradition these days, huh? First he folds (early) on the WWF name. Then he does away with the IC title. Now the KOTR. Next thing you know there will be no Royal Rumble in 2004. Wouldn't surprise me in the least, either.

Guest Kahran Ramsus
Posted

It really could have been so much more. What really killed it for me was all the times they only had the semi-finals and finals. What was the point if they only had to wrestle twice?

Guest Kahran Ramsus
Posted
Wow, Vinnie Mac really has a hate-on for tradition these days, huh? First he folds (early) on the WWF name. Then he does away with the IC title. Now the KOTR. Next thing you know there will be no Royal Rumble in 2004. Wouldn't surprise me in the least, either.

If he kills the Rumble, that's it for me. It is my favourite match of the year. I am still bitter over 1999, but at least they had the match.

Guest JHawk
Posted
It really could have been so much more. What really killed it for me was all the times they only had the semi-finals and finals. What was the point if they only had to wrestle twice?

Actually, I did a Smackdown recap as a tryout for Wrestleline back in the day (right before KOR 2001), and I remember commenting how "Angle had to win three times last year, but this year he doesn't even need to win all three matches to repeat." Which defeats the purpose of pushing Angle's previous tournament win.

 

Such a great idea, and yet so stupidly done.

Guest Your Olympic Hero
Posted
somewhere, Mabel weeps...

as does Mr. Ass

Guest MarvinisaLunatic
Posted

All this retro stuff reminded me of when WCW did the Lord of the Ring and DDP won and he got a ring.

 

Honestly...this sucks, but its not like they scrapped the Royal Rumble..although at this rate they might as well change the name of Survivor Series to something else since they abandoned that format a long time ago.

 

Anyone know what the June PPV is gonna be called? I vote for Great American Bash but that won't happen.

Guest JHawk
Posted

I'd like to see them call the June PPV "$34.95 for THIS?"

Guest Youth N Asia
Posted
somewhere, Mabel weeps...

While devouring a Big Mac

Guest Texas Small Arms 09
Posted

I wonder if it will still be worth going to. I plan on it as long as it doesn't suck too bad.

Guest Youth N Asia
Posted

Are they still using the King of the Ring title? Or switching to God knows what?

Guest AnnieEclectic
Posted

Wow.... I dunno, this one at least had some tradition to it, even if the PPV itself lost luster. Seeing as I haven't watched a show in 4 months now, I'd probably be more ticked than if I was still viewing...

 

-Annie

Guest Kahran Ramsus
Posted
Are they still using the King of the Ring title? Or switching to God knows what?

I think they are scrapping the name completely.

Guest bravesfan
Posted

Stick with the name AT LEAST....

 

Or just lift one of the UK PPV names (Insurrextion, Rebellion), like they did with No Mercy.

 

 

EDIT:

All this retro stuff reminded me of when WCW did the Lord of the Ring and DDP won and he got a ring.

 

It was the Battlebowl Ring, which he then promptly sold (?) to get out of debt (in the storyline).

Guest Youth N Asia
Posted

The IC title has lost its luster...King of the Ring has lost its luster...

 

Soon Vince is just going to realize that this whole "wrestling" deal has lost its luster and he's going to swicth Raw to a cooking show or something of that nature.

 

JR: "Season it, Stone Cold! Season that meatloaf bahgawd!"

Guest Showstoppa Icon
Posted

its not on-topic, but why did they do away with Fully Loaded as a name for a PPV?

Guest Choken One
Posted

Expect them to rename it into some bland "Action" style word like

 

Damage

Turmoil...

 

I doubt they will...but if they WANT they should bring back an Old WCW name either Great American Bash, Starrcade, Meyhem (Sue Me I liked it), Havoc (Drop the Halloween of course)...but expect them to use an old IYH or England name like

 

Insurexxtion or whatever the fuck...

Guest bravesfan
Posted

"Original" Titles

Destruction

Onslaught

Retribution

Revolution

 

WCW PPV Titles

Sin

Greed

Revenge

 

Reprisal Titles

Carnage (from U.K. PPV "Capitol Carnage")

Massacre (from U.S. PPV "St. Valentine's Day Massacre")

Breakdown (from U.S. PPV of same name)

Guest Youth N Asia
Posted
its not on-topic, but why did they do away with Fully Loaded as a name for a PPV?

Cause Vengence was so darn good they had to use it TWICE in an 8 month span.

Guest Choken One
Posted

Fully Loaded...Once the July PPV for about 3 years (Also was loosely based as "HHH" PPV, ala Rock Bottom)...Was absolved for the InVasion name which was assumed to be an one shot deal...Well 9/11 happened and they decided to Absolve the name Armageddeon for the time being and placed Vengence for the December PPV. Then came July again and instead of returning to Fully Loaded...It was given the Vengence title and Armageddeon was back as the December ppv...

Guest Showstoppa Icon
Posted
Bring back Fully Loaded! ... What?

Backlash, No Mercy, No Way Out, unforgiven, Vengeance....i dont think theyre much better. Not that Fully Loaded is great or anything

Guest Youth N Asia
Posted

Maybe it's just the idea that when they were still using the Fully Loaded name...the WWF didn't suck. Maybe that's the jinx

Guest Choken One
Posted

I like No Mercy...Backlash is an good name since it's really just WM rematchese...

 

No Way Out isn't very good...

 

Vengence is no different then Rebellion so...

 

I know we will NEVER see it again but OVER THE EDGE was a great name...

Guest creativename
Posted
I know we will NEVER see it again but OVER THE EDGE was a great name...

Just wait a year, and if Edge once again becomes their golden boy (which he certainly was not after the Albert feud), they might consider it...if it even occurs to them.

Guest Choken One
Posted

There other ways to use "Edge"

 

Off the Edge...

 

The Edge...

 

Edgeucution...

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...