Mark Calloway, Company Man

[Guest AndrewTS]

Wasn't it reported that Taker thought highly of Albert, and thought he had the potential to be a star?

 

Well, this would be Taker's chance to put his money where his mouth is.

 

Unless you're saying Taker was just positioning himself to get an easy win at WM, but that would never be the case

I was thinking the same thing. When you think about it, aside from the streak, Taker has no excuse to go over any of these guys.

 

Show? Just beat him clean as a whistle at N0 Way Out.

 

Albert? He's all buddy-buddy with him and says he'll be a big star. He's gone over Albert on TV already.

 

Jones? WWE would want to push him with a big win.

[Guest snowfan]

Wasn't it reported that Taker thought highly of Albert, and thought he had the potential to be a star?

 

Well, this would be Taker's chance to put his money where his mouth is.

 

Unless you're saying Taker was just positioning himself to get an easy win at WM, but that would never be the case

He could always go for that win over Lou thesz and it *might* just be believable considering Thesz is dead and all.

 

DeadtiredMan limping.

 

snowfan

[Guest Nanks]

I might point out at this juncture that despite all of Undertaker's supposed backstage politicking, the streak is over people. All of Undertaker's Wrestlemania wins have been in singles matches. He has a 9-0 SINGLES record at Wrestlemania. If he does in fact compete in a tag match then he will sit on his 9-0 record.

[Guest Youth N Asia]

I might point out at this juncture that despite all of Undertaker's supposed backstage politicking, the streak is over people. All of Undertaker's Wrestlemania wins have been in singles matches. He has a 9-0 SINGLES record at Wrestlemania. If he does in fact compete in a tag match then he will sit on his 9-0 record.

Yeah, but JR never says "Undefeated in singles matches at Wrestlemania."

 

So if he wins in a tag match they'll still pimp the undefeated gimmick.