Guest THE MIGHTY THOR Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 That's the one that Regal got fired over right? I've always wanted to see it just cause the thought of seeing Regal shoot on Goldberg is kind of funny I don't know if he got fired over it or what, I never knew that anyhow. All I know is that the match is SHIT, I'm talking horribleness at it's worse here. Just the way both guys were moving, they did NOT want to be in there. I'll send it to you if you want. Regal in a shitty match????What else is new???
Guest Brian Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 That's the one. Goldy got pissed because Regal stiffed him back for the sloppiness.
Guest THE MIGHTY THOR Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 I saw it, shitty match and Regal exposed Greenberg as the true punk that he is.
Guest FeArHaVoC Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 If you're wondering "who's next" for Goldberg, it looks like we'll find out at Backlash... Dave Meltzer reports that Goldberg probably signed his contract over a week ago, but was asked by WWE officials to keep it quiet. Goldberg has been "living at the gym" for the past week or so to get back into the shape he wants to be in to look his best for TV. Because of the timing of the signing, it is not expected that Goldberg will have a match at Wrestlemania, although an appearance isn’t out of the question. Money was apparently decided upon a while ago, and scheduling and creative were the holdups. It is thought that Goldberg agreed to about 100 dates in the contract for use over the next year. It is said that the Rock agreed to stay until the April PPV in order to have a match with Goldberg, and Rock was a major catalyst to getting this deal done, as he set up a secret meeting between Goldberg and Vince McMahon several weeks ago. It is now expected that Rock vs Goldberg will headline the Backlash PPV on April 27. Credit: Wrestling Observer Newsletter/411mania
Guest notJames Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 We complained about Nash coming back. We complained about Hall coming back. We complained about Hogan coming back. We complained about Steiner coming back. Thus far we are batting 1.000 as far as these guys being draws. Why should Goldberg be any different? Too true. (sigh) How futile this all has become. I can't even muster the strength anymore to type "Fuck Goldberg" (Or perhaps, I do have the strength after all.) Alas, I will sit and stew in my depression until this latest financial drain sends WW_ scrambling for another quick fix and failing. Because really, who's left?
Guest FeArHaVoC Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 No one is left. After this WWE is either going to keep going with the same stale Headliners or build new stars. Which one you think?
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 The only names i can think of left in the US (who can still wrestle) are Luger, Sting and Foley, and the first two are shot to fuck. I call Foley as the next big signing.
Guest notJames Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Not if he has half the dignity I think he has. It would be like opening himself up to shit like the Cactus Jack amnesia angle all over again. I have no faith that WW_ can sway Foley to come back considering the shape they're in right now. He should stick to writing. No need to put his body on the line any more. He's done more than his fair share.
Guest FeArHaVoC Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Foley was never a guy to carry a company anyway, and Sting and Luger are laughable.
Guest buffybeast Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 If Rock, Austin and Hogan couldn't turn the ratings around for more than a few weeks, what makes WWE think Goldie can?
Guest tpww7 Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Well that's good that they changed it, I'm sure I read it was originally to be April 13.
Guest hb2k_buzzsaw Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Guys, don't you realise that if this is the last big hotshot, that it's a good thing? They'll have no choice but to push new stars. And for that, I am hoping that Goldberg makes WWE a bit of money, but is a failure in WWE, for that very reason. That or they sign Lex Luger in an attempt to sabotage WWA. Noooooo!!!!!!
Guest oldschoolwrestling Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Sting is actually the last big name out there after Goldberg.
Guest Brian Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Were the two pay-offs worth it for the NWO? Was the short-term ratings boost worth it for Steiner?
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 i think foley needs WWE as much as they might need him. without the wrestling connection he's just another author. and money>dignity and common sense
Guest geniusMoment Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 Keller is reporting Goldberg is in full time with a multi year deal. I am glad, I realize everyone will disagree but I feel he brings an intangible to the table that Steiner, Hogan, Nash and Hall didn't in that he is still young enough to work. He can still appeal to people my age, college kids. He shows great intensity in the ring.
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 the problem is that all these big names are attracting the wrong fan base from a business point of view. The biggest money in any entertainment business (which is what WWE is, don't fool yourself) is in the kids, teenagers with disposable income. Guys like Goldberg, Steiner, Hogan and HBK appeal most to the people who were teen marks the first time they came around. For example, i mark out for HBK's entrance music because when i was 14 and into wrestling for the first time he was the cool champion. Therefore, i give him a nostalgia pop. However, to the young fans getting into wrestling today, the ones who still believe its kinda real, he's the guy that used to be cool, who used to be big. The guy his parents or older brother liked. Which, as we all know, is not gonna make you like something more. It's like a band from the mid nineties who were cutting edge then, but just sound dated now. As soon as the nostalgia pops die out, unless you move onto something else you're gonna be forgotten. Look at flair. He's reinvented himself, and is now more over than HHH without stepping foot in the ring (something Hunter could learn from). If they bring Goldberg in as a new charachter and try to build him up he'll get over, but if he's bought in to trade on former glories he'll fail. Look at Booker T, he needed to be reinvented before WWE fans grew to like him and get behind him. Discuss
Guest Your Olympic Hero Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 - I am 99% sure Ultimo Dragon has signed with WWE as well, but he will wrestle a more limited schedule (not be on all house shows - will do around 10 shows per month as opposed to 15). He will begin on the Smackdown roster shortly after WrestleMania. Kick ass.... I'm tired of seeing Funaki get squashed on Velocity against Demott and A Train. We've needed another Japanese jobber in his place for a while now.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now