Brand Only PPV's

[LooseCannon25 0]

I think the secondary titles (Intercontinetal and U.S, or European) should be brough back. Then with RVD vs. Booker T, or a similiar match it could be for a title and mean a little more.

[Guest The Czech Republic]

I think the WCW setup of championships was the best. World Heavyweight, United States, World Tag-Team, Cruiserweight, Television. When we were getting ready for the big split last March, my idea was to have the big belt, a secondary, a tag-team, a women's and a novelty (cruiser for one, hardcore for the other) for each.

[Guest Retro Rob]

I'm actually looking forward to the brand oly PPVs. It will be nice to see good talent on the PPVs for a change. These are the guys who bust their asses more than the main eventers, but never get any recognition for it. I don't think Vince is dumb enough to charge full price though. Also, since there will only be 4 Raw PPVS and 4 SD! PPVs, they shouldn't have any problems with running out of guys to mix and match.

[LooseCannon25 0]

So, basically the format is like this then:

 

April ---- Both

May ---- Both

June ---- RAW

July ---- SmackDown!

Aug ---- Both

Sept ---- RAW

Oct ----- Smackdown!

Nov ----- Both

Dec ----- RAW

Jan ----- Both

Feb. ----- Smackdown!

 

Is this format correct?

 

If it is that gives each brand only 3 brand only PPV until next years WrestleMania....in that case it might not be hard to mix and match their rosters. This could work pretty well actually

[Guest Trivia247]

Brand PPVs wouldn't be half bad because you do have options to either pull out longer matches, if Vince flat out refuses to put other people on TV, or that they give more matches and angles to those they never seem to get time for. the Richards the Dreamers etc.

[Guest The Hollywood Fashion Plate]

This could also give importance to shows like Heat and Velocity, allowing them to be used to further angles/storylines moreso than today.