Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest jester

Nash and HHH

Recommended Posts

Guest creativename
By the way, the Red Wings just went down 3 games to none to the DUCKS. THE MIGHTY DUCKS OF ANAHEIM. So truly there is something more pathetic than Vince’s booking.

 

:lol:

 

Anyway, about SK--I've never once seen anyone give him "verbal blowjobs". I've seen some people defend him a little bit, because he actually gets trashed a good deal on these and other boards. People love to make fun of him. I really don't see why--yeah, he's very repititive, but then we all are. That's because the problems with the WWE are always the fucking same. SK is a decent writer, nothing special, but most people bash him just for its own sake.

 

As for the Nash thing--it's quite obvious that this is the case. You can't say "Oh SK has no cred" when he's stating something blatanly obvious. There're levels of smarkiness, remember--I'm sure a lot of his readers aren't as painfully aware of this stuff as we all are.

 

I think I was actually the first person to call Nash beating HHH for the title at Judgement Day, then jobbing to Goldberg at Bad Blood about 3 weeks ago. They'll probably bring up "continuity" about Goldberg's streak ending at Nash's hands, call it his "quest for revenge", and expect people to give a shit. The reason I'm becoming more and more convinced that it's gonna go down like this is because I just don't see any way that HHH or Goldberg would job for each other.

 

The one thing I'm hoping is that Jericho will refuse to be fodder for Goldberg at Judgement Day. They just don't have anyone else for Goldberg to face, unless they stick him in some meaningless tag match, which I don't think they'd do. Even though Jericho is always a pushover when it comes to being the sacrificial lamb, this is the one time I can actually see him raising a fuss, for obvious reasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As for the Nash thing--it's quite obvious that this is the case.  You can't say "Oh SK has no cred" when he's stating something blatanly obvious.  There're levels of smarkiness, remember--I'm sure a lot of his readers aren't as painfully aware of this stuff as we all are.

But given how THIS piece of info has been common knowledge for nearly eight months, Scott Keith stating it as if it was some shocking, recently revealed piece of backstage gossip comes off as him backpeddling after getting blasted for his obnoxious "I know something you don't know!" way of gloating about knowing backstage gossip...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Midnight Express83

Well, he isn't writing for TSM he is writing for 411. They don't just have smarks read their stuff, also marks. So you have to, you know, play to everyone, not just the select few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×