Guest The Son of Sting Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Estimates show WM did between 525,000-550,000 (around the 1.0 buy rate).If these numbers hold up it will be the second lowest WM after WM 97. In contrast The Royal Rumble (which wasnt carried by Direct TV) did 636,100 buys. WO news letter.
Guest Space_Cowboy Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 You mean an event where the main advertising point was a pair of old geezers in a battle of the world's largest egos didn't draw magnificently?! Well i'm just SHOCKED.
Guest Damn You Helmsley Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Angle versus Benoit defeats McMahon versus Hogan. Makes sense.
Guest snuffbox Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Would have been better if Nash and the Ultimat Warrior were there. Always next year.
Guest tank_abbott Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 I bet that xtra 100,000 buys decided not to order after seeing Nathan Jones was taken out on Heat....
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 It's still way too early to determine the buyrate. These are all just preliminary numbers. And Angle v. Benoit wasn't really the main selling point of the RR and I don't think it affected the buyrate at all
Guest The Tino Standard Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 If these numbers hold up, you just KNOW they'll find a way to spin it, saying Brock and Angle weren't ready to headline WrestleMania, when in the meantime ALL THE F'N HYPE IN THE WORLD went into the Battle of the Geriatrics.
Guest Anglesault Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 It's still way too early to determine the buyrate. These are all just preliminary numbers. And Angle v. Benoit wasn't really the main selling point of the RR and I don't think it affected the buyrate at all "Why, yes, Mr. McMahon, I did try to defend you against those evil smarks. And I let them know Angle and Benoit don't draw. " Anyway, I'm not shocked. It was bad build up, mostly.
LooseCannon25 Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 When ALL of your freakin hype is on a battle of guys in their 50's, and one isnt even a wrestler you're not gonna get a good buyrate. IT seems that Vince always has to be involved at Wrestlemania, either in a match or run in......You guys may hate HHH, and Goldberg, but at least they're performers. Instead of a guy who can barely get off the air for a legdrop anymore and a guy who isnt even on the roster. They need to get their shit straight NOW or else next yeras mania will draw a .35
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 It's still way too early to determine the buyrate. These are all just preliminary numbers. And Angle v. Benoit wasn't really the main selling point of the RR and I don't think it affected the buyrate at all "Why, yes, Mr. McMahon, I did try to defend you against those evil smarks. And I let them know Angle and Benoit don't draw. " Anyway, I'm not shocked. It was bad build up, mostly. Anglesault- What two matches got the most hype for the Royal Rumble? HHH v. Steiner Royal Rumble match Those matches were pushed as the main events and drew the strong buyrate. Angle v. Benoit wasn't hyped up to the level of the other two matches so it probably did not affect the buyrate at all. I wouldn't be suprised if WM didn't do that well this year because they didn't hype it around a wrestling match, they hyped it on a 'sports-entertainment' spectacular. And as the rating have shown for things like the Rock concert- the fans prefer wrestling
Guest Anglesault Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Come on, you can say it. It didn't draw shit because the only hype was for two geezers no one wanted to fight. Vince was wrong. He made an asshole, egomanical choice that fucked up his show. Say it.
Guest creativename Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 It's still way too early to determine the buyrate. These are all just preliminary numbers. You can't honestly expect the actual numbers to be very different. This low buyrate is not surprising at all. I was expecting 600,000, but the only people really shocked is the WWE. They were probably expecting around 700,000 (though the idiots told their investors to expect 850,000, the same as last year).
Guest caboose Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Well I for one am happy the buyrate is so low. Vince CANNOT ignore this now. Though I'm sure he WILL.
Guest UndertakerHart Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Wait a sec here. The WWE also hyped Rock-Austin 3 and that didn't help because we've already seen it many times before. Also, Limp Biskit and the Budweiser cat fight girls could have dropped it. Now, that I think about it. Why should people buy the PPV when they can buy it on DVD for 20 dollars cheaper with extras.
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Come on, you can say it. It didn't draw shit because the only hype was for two geezers no one wanted to fight. Vince was wrong. He made an asshole, egomanical choice that fucked up his show. Say it. I just said it Anglesault. Did you read this?- they didn't hype it around a wrestling match, they hyped it on a 'sports-entertainment' spectacular. And as the rating have shown for things like the Rock concert- the fans prefer wrestling
Guest Anglesault Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Come on, you can say it. It didn't draw shit because the only hype was for two geezers no one wanted to fight. Vince was wrong. He made an asshole, egomanical choice that fucked up his show. Say it. I just said it Anglesault. Did you read this?- they didn't hype it around a wrestling match, they hyped it on a 'sports-entertainment' spectacular. And as the rating have shown for things like the Rock concert- the fans prefer wrestling No you didn't. You sugarcoated it. I want you to say "Vince McMahon is an asshole egomaniac who ruined his own show by putting ALL the hype on a match NO ONE wanted to see." Say it.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Hold up... how was the Rumble NOT on DirecTV? Especially since I watched it at home on my DirecTV system? Someone ain't doing their homework...
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Come on, you can say it. It didn't draw shit because the only hype was for two geezers no one wanted to fight. Vince was wrong. He made an asshole, egomanical choice that fucked up his show. Say it. I just said it Anglesault. Did you read this?- they didn't hype it around a wrestling match, they hyped it on a 'sports-entertainment' spectacular. And as the rating have shown for things like the Rock concert- the fans prefer wrestling No you didn't. You sugarcoated it. I want you to say "Vince McMahon is an asshole egomaniac who ruined his own show by putting ALL the hype on a match NO ONE wanted to see." Say it. I said centering the show around Hogan v. Vince was a bad idea. I don't think the show was "ruined" as you put it. He still sold out Safeco Field and made a killing at Fan Axxess. The show did a dissapointing buyrate because Vince centred it around the wrong match but I wouldn't say the show was ruined
Guest Anglesault Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Thirteen people ordered Wrestlemania. Out of NINETEEN shows, Only ONE has been worse. That is a terrible, terrible failure. No other way to look at it.
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Technically the first one wasn't a Pay Per View. The buyrate sucks for a Wrestlemania but I think in the end Vince is gonna make a profit since the gate was 2.7 million and he probably made a lot off Fan Axxxxxxxxxxxess.
Guest Anglesault Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 I'm sure he made a profit. Another thing you have to consider. How many of those people ordered because it was Mania? Of those thirteen, if six had no real interest and just bought on the name, they are screwed.
Guest Mulatto Heat Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 It's still way too early to determine the buyrate. These are all just preliminary numbers. And Angle v. Benoit wasn't really the main selling point of the RR and I don't think it affected the buyrate at all "Why, yes, Mr. McMahon, I did try to defend you against those evil smarks. And I let them know Angle and Benoit don't draw. " Anyway, I'm not shocked. It was bad build up, mostly. Anglesault- What two matches got the most hype for the Royal Rumble? HHH v. Steiner Royal Rumble match Those matches were pushed as the main events and drew the strong buyrate. Angle v. Benoit wasn't hyped up to the level of the other two matches so it probably did not affect the buyrate at all. I wouldn't be suprised if WM didn't do that well this year because they didn't hype it around a wrestling match, they hyped it on a 'sports-entertainment' spectacular. And as the rating have shown for things like the Rock concert- the fans prefer wrestling That makes zero sense as Hogan/Vince was just as much a wrestling match as HHH/Steiner, if not moreso. The latter was very much centered around "sports-entertainment" skits, so to say that the fans 'prefer wrestling' is not only jumping to conclusions, but supports Angle/Benoit as well.
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Well this was before Steiner was exposed for being the waste he was. HHH v. Steiner and the Rumble match were heavily hyped for the PPV and deserve the credit for the buyrate I think
Guest Kotzenjunge Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Did they ever say "Sold-Out Safeco Field?" I don't think they did, and you know they would have if they could. EDIT: And Bob, you can bet your ass that the buyrate for the Rumble would have been MUCH lower if that Angle/Benoit match hadn't gone on. You make it sound as if you can attribute ALL of the buys to Steiner/Trips and the Rumble match. While the Rumble match always draws very well (and with good reason, I love it too), you can't totally discount the Smackdown side of things.
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 I think they mentioned it was sold out. They did set an attendence record and had a 2.7 million gate
Guest CanadianChick Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Did they ever say "Sold-Out Safeco Field?" I don't think they did, and you know they would have if they could. It was a Sasco Feild record attendance.
Guest Mulatto Heat Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Well this was before Steiner was exposed for being the waste he was. HHH v. Steiner and the Rumble match were heavily hyped for the PPV and deserve the credit for the buyrate I think I still don't know how this translates to "fans prefer wrestling matches to sports entertainment spectaculars" when Mania had a few of each, and the focus of the Rumble PPV was not centered at all around wrestling....
Guest Kotzenjunge Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Safeco Field record attendances can be attained very easily considering the fact that SO MUCH ROOM is taken up by the baseball field. Never ONCE did they say "sold-out."
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Mania was built around Hogan v. Vince- a match between two guys that don't wrestle regularly at all. I think had they hyped it around Brock v. Angle they could've done a bit better And ratings for things like The Rock Concert (Which bombed) shows that the fans would rather watch wrestling. The hype for the Rumble was around a 60 minute battle royal and HHH v. Steiner- two wrestling matches, one a "dream" match.
Guest bob_barron Posted April 18, 2003 Report Posted April 18, 2003 Safeco Field record attendances can be attained very easily considering the fact that SO MUCH ROOM is taken up by the baseball field. Never ONCE did they say "sold-out." I thought I remember hearing them mention a sell out before but either way the show did a terrific gate
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now