Jump to content

Not a bad thing, a good thing?


  

16 members have voted

  1. 1. Not a bad thing, a good thing?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      12


Recommended Posts

Posted

Would it be a good thing for wrestling if the WWF went out of business?

Guest AM The Kid
Posted

Are you kidding me? It would be the worst thing for the buisness, the WWF currently...and has been for decades now "THE" wrestling company. No other federations could bring back what the WWF has/had.

Guest The Man They Call Texas Blu
Posted

Say what you want about Vinnie Mac, but if it wasn't for the WWF, wrestling would be none existant. Well at least in North America, and unless its a junior match, I get kinda board of Japanese wrestling, no offense to puro fans.

Guest Mystery Eskimo
Posted

It might not be bad for them to have a scare and lose some money to make Vince rethink the nepotism currently ruining the product.

 

But to go totally out of business would probably if not destroy american wrestling then set it back years.

Posted

If the past year has been any indication, the WWF's creative well has run completely dry as they've managed to fuck up everything that they could have possibly fucked up in recent times.

 

I've been a WWF supporter for over a decade and, at this point, even I wouldn't bet against Stephanie winning the WWF Title on Monday night.  That's how screwed up they've gotten.

 

I'm tired of being embarrassed to be a wrestling fan because of the shitty product that the WWF puts on TV.  To most people, "wrestling" is nothing but stupid skits and McMahons cutting twenty-minute promos every week, and quite frankly, I'm starting to agree with them.

 

Maybe it would help bring some RESPECT back to professional wrestling if its biggest representative weren't also its most ridiculous representative.

Guest muzanisa
Posted

I think it needs the same thing that happened in the mid 90's to happen again. A whole bunch of guys left,Bret left, Michaels had to retire. Undertaker actually put over Foley enough for him to be a star.

You need the older guys to go to the mid-card for awhile to give the lower level talent a chance to prove themselves. You also need some of them to put over these guys.

I don't see that happening with Hogan, Nash, Austin or Taker.

Rock who I don't like as a wrestler seems to understand and do what's good for the business,but will probably only have a part time role if his acting career takes off.

HHH I'm in two minds on. He had the Foley rub and worked well with Rikishi and TAKA. But all indications are that he's a master politician.

So things will get staler until he can't pay the big boys salaries and the cheaper guys get a push.

With foreign rights and tours plus the core base they would have to be extremely stupid to go out of business.

Still any other company that had so many botched storylines in the past year would have changed writers.

Posted

Are you out of your mind?!?!??! Then we wouldn't have wrestling on tv at least for a few months. Also the WWF brought me into wrestling so I would hate to see it die. It sucks now and they will botch the split maybe but it always gets better.

Guest AM The Kid
Posted
Then we wouldn't have wrestling on tv at least for a few months.

For a few months? It would be for a lot longer than that. It could be years before we see another fed on a prime channel like the WWF.

Guest razazteca
Posted

wrestling business is similiar to the computer business

 

WWF = Microsoft

 

NWA = Unix

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...