Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 This could be total bullshit and I do realzie that, but this is something that could quite possibly happen. There are suggestions that Kevin Nash may dress up as Kane to face Triple H on next Monday's edition of RAW and not Glen Jacobs himself (Kane). Now I think this would be a good thing. If the creative team can get their heads out of their asses and actually do it correctly.
LaParkaYourCar Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Whoa.......HOLY CONTINUITY BATMAN. Since Glen Jacobs played the Fake Diesel, Nash playing the Fake Kane would be funny.
Guest Choken One Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Good Thing? Of course...this comes from the guy who Thought Flair/HBK 03 was classic.... Johnson is the dumbest idiot around here.
Guest Choken One Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Source? Johnsons sick imagination.... About 100 people used that exact same scenariro in Fantasy Booking...
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Good Thing? Of course...this comes from the guy who Thought Flair/HBK 03 was classic.... Johnson is the dumbest idiot around here. Look man, get off my back. Just because I don't care for the same things you do doesn't make me an idiot. Now I am not going to sit here and throw flames at you as you did to me, I'll just tell you. If you don't agree with me, fine. If my opinion differs from yours, fine. But keep your mouth shut if you have nothing creative or intelligent to offer the thread.
Guest Choken One Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Creative? Sure... There about 10457 better ways to work Kane/HHH this Monday... Hell...Putting Viscera under the mask is better then Nash...
LaParkaYourCar Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 It wouldn't work because 1) Nash has tattoos on his arm that would be seen 2) Nash's hair is thicker and longer
Guest Choken One Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 It wouldn't work because 1) Nash has tattoos on his arm that would be seen 2) Nash's hair is thicker and longer dont forget 3) Nash Is Taller 4) Nash is Fatter 5) Nash is imobile
rising up out of the back seat-nuh Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 I hope it's Mr. America under the mask...
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 http://www.prowrestling.com/ Laparka I also thought about that, Nash not being able to do it, and honestly, do you think Vince wouldn't do? I mean he's done dumber things here latley.
Guest Choken One Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Dumber? Vince has set the standard in "getting dumber" as an art form the last 25 years...
Guest Jobber of the Week Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 1) Nash has tattoos on his arm that would be seen Kane is back in a suit that covers up his body (as opposed to that last suit that showed his chest quite well.) Undertaker played Kane during the Ministry of Darkness angle in 99 as the bare arm of "Kane" was covered and nobody noticed at first.
LaParkaYourCar Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 ProWrestling.com??? What the hell??? Give me Meltz and I'll listen.
LaParkaYourCar Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 1) Nash has tattoos on his arm that would be seen Kane is back in a suit that covers up his body (as opposed to that last suit that showed his chest quite well.) Undertaker played Kane during the Ministry of Darkness angle in 99 as the bare arm of "Kane" was covered and nobody noticed at first. Kane had worn a full body suit before so no one thought anything about it when Taker played as him.
Guest Choken One Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 1) Nash has tattoos on his arm that would be seen Kane is back in a suit that covers up his body (as opposed to that last suit that showed his chest quite well.) Undertaker played Kane during the Ministry of Darkness angle in 99 as the bare arm of "Kane" was covered and nobody noticed at first. as soon as Kane shows up with that suit...The gig is up...
Guest DarkHollywood Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Nice giving away the possible spoiler in the topic name. Your suppose to use one of those codes so that only the spoiler can be seen when you highlight it. ---------------------------------------------------------- "Regarding Spoilers... Thanks to Areacode212, we now have a way to encode spoilers. The syntax is as follows: Syntax: Spoiler (Highlight to Read): spoiler text here You would have to highlight anything inbetween the spoiler tags in order to read them... - Dames "
Guest Jobber of the Week Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 True, true. I doubt this would work. Even if they mysteriously gave him the body suit again, everybody would notice Kane's skinny legs.
Guest DarkHollywood Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 No one will notice unless your blind...but you could probably smell the bullshit a mile away. Hehe....ok that wasn't too funny.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 No one would be fooled by this... You mean like we have been fooled by Hogan?
Bored Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 I've said it before and I'll say it again...Johnson go HERE: http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/gentopic...c.asp?board=546 They'll like you there and they make pointless "spoiler" topics all the time too.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 I've said it before and I'll say it again...Johnson go HERE: http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/gentopic...c.asp?board=546 They'll like you there and they make pointless "spoiler" topics all the time too. Instead of typing it over, Look man, get off my back. Just because I don't care for the same things you do doesn't make me an idiot. Now I am not going to sit here and throw flames at you as you did to me, I'll just tell you. If you don't agree with me, fine. If my opinion differs from yours, fine. But keep your mouth shut if you have nothing creative or intelligent to offer the thread.
Guest gwf0704 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 GO It seems to make some sense as SPURS they need to continue to keep Nash busy til they find a new feud for him to be in. GO
Guest Kingpk Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 That subject line looks like something from one of those two-bit NeWZ sites. It's an idea that will go over most of the fans' heads anyway. And what the hell is up with THIS?: UNDERTAKER to -=DRESS UP=- as Kane - 100% PROOF! **Click HERE!** PLEASE NOTE: The contents promoted in the above advertisment may NOT be true and were placed in the post by the reporter to advertise a 3rd Party website ....Yeah
Guest Space_Cowboy Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Well this would be a sufficiently stupid and blatantly obvious way to screw everyone out of an actual result to the match, not that anyone gives a shit anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if the WWE was at least considering something dumb like this, stupidity's what they do best.
Guest Dangerous A Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 Nash's stick legs will give him away.
Guest NoCalMike Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 The biggest problem with this scenario is the fact that Nash is not really over. And the only time he shows being over, is when he is getting booed out of the building. They should just let the Nash/HHH angle go.
Guest Dangerous A Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 The biggest problem with this scenario is the fact that Nash is not really over. And the only time he shows being over, is when he is getting booed out of the building. They should just let the Nash/HHH angle go. Hey, get back to work, bitch! You're fixing to get sent home.
Guest Ace309 Posted June 20, 2003 Report Posted June 20, 2003 "Dude, Kane's been deep-conditioning his... Oh."
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now