Guest Ghettoman Report post Posted June 26, 2003 Sorry but one month of WWE costs 40, and one month of TNA costs 40, there's just more of everything with the WWE. I'm not gonna pay 10 for one ok cage match, or one spotty tag, I can sit down and think of cooler spots with my action figures. I'm certainly not gonna pay for promo's, especially b-rate ones. There's no way I'm paying ten dollars for a main event that came off about as well as a backyard feds. It's just not worth it. It's nice to see you get behind it and all, but why pay the money for something that's just as bad as the WWE? Is that one entertaining spotfest a week worth it? Is there not a match in ROH with better replay value than the live show tehre putting on? I just don't see how some people can be so blindly behind it when it just doesn't compare to the rest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JacK Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Well - I for one love TNA, cept of course Vince Russo (heh, the banner in the first Aussie show that said something like "the total nonstop action has stop" captured Russo perfectly). Dunno why, everyone else thinks it's cheap and crap, but maybe since I hate WWE so much for the Australian TV screwjob (specially since the tools are actually touring here later this year; yeah, that's real good, you won't let 'em show it on TV, so we have to pay hundreds of bucks to get poor seats at some dodgy stadium for a one night show . . . sure, I can just see it being a full house . . . ohya ) Ok, Because of all that rhetoric I may be biased, but I Dunna care; and I'm not paying for it, my friend is, in a semi-roundabout sort of way; so only ~ Russo the lamoid ~; and the inane, pointless mainevents with the 1001 run-ins really unnerve me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Astro101 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2003 I always have low expectaions for everything I do or see. That way, I won't be disappointed! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
