Since the Trish Stratus interview didn't work out

[Guest TheGame2705]

1.)Trying to act like an annoying "I've got the edge" reporter

2.)Making light of the shit that happened that could have seriously tarnished the writer and this site's cred

3.)Said writer not liking Albert

 

Look... seriously. I get the point that you don't like me. And to be honest, it doesn't bother me. Replying with ridiculous accusations, and irrelevant facts is tiresome though. If it continues, I will ask that an administrator looks at your posting priviliges.

Look...seriously. The reason you annoy me so much is that I think you personify everything that is bad about smarks and that you're the type of person Bradshaw, Nash, Taker, and HHH talk about. The crap annoys me. I've read one good article from you and you do like one a day it seems. The third was also a joke.

 

What I've seen from you is that once the debate gets too heated you pull out and if you wanna cry to Dames that I think you suck at writing and making arguments in general than fine. I don't think I've ever actually flamed you.

[Guest OnlyMe]

Look...seriously. The reason you annoy me so much is that I think you personify everything that is bad about smarks and that you're the type of person Bradshaw, Nash, Taker, and HHH talk about. The crap annoys me.

 

Like what? Come on, please give me some examples of what I have done that annoys you so so much. Outside of this interview, which was a JOKE, I have NEVER talked about backstage politics in my column. NEVER. I talk about things as a wrestling fan.

 

I've read one good article from you and you do like one a day it seems. The third was also a joke.

 

That's fine... I don't expect everyone to like what I write. Constructive criticism is appreciated.

 

 

What I've seen from you is that once the debate gets too heated you pull out

 

Want to back that accusation up?

 

and if you wanna cry to Dames that I think you suck at writing and making arguments in general than fine. I don't think I've ever actually flamed you.

 

8. Flame-Baiting. If you consistently attempt to engage someone in a flame war, you are subject to a one- time warning. Remember, if you have a problem with someone, take it to NHB. There's a quote button for a reason.

 

That's from the rules. Little, snarky comments such as "wanna cry to Dames", or constantly banging on about how much I suck are just boring.

 

So I'm asking you to justify your comments.

[Guest Slapnuts00]

What bridge do we have with WWE? Isn't it TNA we have an in with?

[Guest Retro Rob]

What bridge do we have with WWE?

After this incident, I would say we don't.

 

TNA ALL THE WAY!!!

[Guest RavishingRickRudo]

The WWE has "their people" scouring the internet looking for public reaction and whatnot - most notably Howard Finkle (The guys on Live Audio Wrestling like to make light of his listenership as it's his job) - so if they're reading they probably already have figured out by now that we aren't exactly model fans nor is this a model site... so there isn't much of a bridge here to walk to and from Titan.

[Guest TheGame2705]

Look...seriously. The reason you annoy me so much is that I think you personify everything that is bad about smarks and that you're the type of person Bradshaw, Nash, Taker, and HHH talk about. The crap annoys me.

 

Like what? Come on, please give me some examples of what I have done that annoys you so so much. Outside of this interview, which was a JOKE, I have NEVER talked about backstage politics in my column. NEVER. I talk about things as a wrestling fan.

 

I've read one good article from you and you do like one a day it seems. The third was also a joke.

 

That's fine... I don't expect everyone to like what I write. Constructive criticism is appreciated.

 

 

What I've seen from you is that once the debate gets too heated you pull out

 

Want to back that accusation up?

 

and if you wanna cry to Dames that I think you suck at writing and making arguments in general than fine. I don't think I've ever actually flamed you.

 

8. Flame-Baiting. If you consistently attempt to engage someone in a flame war, you are subject to a one- time warning. Remember, if you have a problem with someone, take it to NHB. There's a quote button for a reason.

 

That's from the rules. Little, snarky comments such as "wanna cry to Dames", or constantly banging on about how much I suck are just boring.

 

So I'm asking you to justify your comments.

A.) The A-Train thread responses annoyed me greatly. You could have cut to the chase in one post and said nothing about him but that you didn't like him which was the end comment. Instead you tried to say he was a shitty wrestler with the only backup being you don't like him personally.

B.) Your column where you try and dispute how WWE is evil for attacking the net but you're just as verbally abusive as Bradshaw and no better than Triple H.

C.) I did make comments on your WWE vs. The Internet article and you got out of all of them by saying I put words in your mouth when it was quite clear you just worded things wrong. You saying you said stuff was worded wrong is one thing but blaming it on me for me taking everything literally is another.

D.) I never said you talked about backstage politics in your columns. Putting words in my mouth now?

 

 

 

If you want proof, I'd need to repost all you did from the A-Train thread to show how you go from "he really sucks" to "he doesn't entertain me and that's my opinion" to "/last post in thread"

[Guest OnlyMe]

I've had enough of this. I did have a quite long post refuting your claims, but I've removed it. You are entitled to your opinions towards me, and I'm fine with that. I just ask that you show me some respect, whether you like me or not I am a person.

 

If you don't like my work, then just don't read it. If you do, and post here, then please again show me some respect. Fine, you don't like it, and I know that my writing isn't 100% perfect, but all I ask is that if you are going to criticise, do it constructively and back up your points.

 

This is my last post in the thread, as I assume the matter is now closed.

 

Nik

Edited July 7, 2003 by OnlyMe

[SpikeFayeJettEdBebop 0]

I like your work.LOL, anyway, I was just gonna say, I also thought we had "bridges" with TNA. So I agree TNA ALL THE WAY!

[Guest DrTom]

Game, if you have problems with Nik, air them out in NHB.