Porn Industry Salivtating at News-

[Guest Ronixis]

MADRID (Reuters) - Scientists in the United States have created hybrid human "she-males," mixing male and female cells in the same embryo, outraging fertility experts and anti-abortionists.

 

Dr. Norbert Gleicher of the Foundation for Reproductive Medicine in Chicago and a colleague injected male cells into female embryos in research which they believe could lead to better treatments or cures for single gene disorders.

 

But their work provoked revulsion when they presented it to the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

 

"There are very good reasons why this type of research is generally rejected by the international research community," Dr. Francoise Shenfield of ESHRE said on Wednesday.

 

"I cannot conceive of any situation in which this particular technique would be acceptable, and if it cannot be applied there is not much use in experimenting with it," she added.

 

Gleicher and his colleague used male cells because they were easier to track as they studied the development of the embryos up to six days.

 

Their work also sparked outrage from abortion opponents who described it as run-away science.

 

"This is gross manipulation of human life," said Nuala Scarisbrick of British anti-abortion charity Life.

 

"The creation of a 'she-male' is disgusting, but not surprising."

 

Gleicher's study was not the only research presented during the four-day conference which enraged pro-life groups.

 

An Israeli scientist who said eggs retrieved from aborted fetuses could relieve the worldwide shortage of human eggs for fertility treatments also stoked fears that science was advancing before legal and ethical consequences could be considered.

 

The FUCK is this?

 

This is one on the freaky meter...

[rising up out of the back seat-nuh 0]

Hmmm, thats just crossing the line.

[Guest redbaron51]

[Guest Vyce]

See, now this is the type of shit that turns me against human cloning.

[Guest Fook_Hing_Ho]

Is there any reason why anyone would WANT to create baby shemales?

 

Any reason at all?

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

Since there's no country that isn't going to condemn using this in practice, I have to take the Devil's Advocate stance and say I'm sorta kinda glad for the scientific discovery. Who knows, down the road, maybe something helpful will be made based on this information.

 

Just don't go around making baby she-males, okay?

[Guest Choken One]

Fuck you, You fucking pretentious bitch...No one cares what your Anti-Abortion Christian fundamentalist ass says.

 

Fuck you, Power seeking motherfuckers ruining the inital purpose of Cell Research just to statiate your fucking curiosity.

[Guest JMA]

Knowingly making a child an outcast? No thanks. I'm still undecided on human cloning, but this serves no purpose.

[Guest kkktookmybabyaway]

I wonder if enough of them get produced if we'll have to include this minority in all college admissions forms...

[Guest Ronixis]

I dont think the Porn Industry would use this- they got cash- BUT not in this area-

 

I afraid in the next 20-30 years the Milltary could use this-can you imagine the Religous ClusterFuck if they use Cloned "Andgro-Cons" in secret missions to oust Terrorist leaders? Good lord I dont even want to think what would they do to them...

 

Hey- Nothing Is Impossible anymore.

[Guest Ghettoman]

It's one step in a long journey of genetic engineering. Any time we do something previously unable to do in the ways of science it's a good thing.

[Guest Crucifixio Jones]

Fuck you, You fucking pretentious bitch...No one cares what your Anti-Abortion Christian fundamentalist ass says.

 

Fuck you, Power seeking motherfuckers ruining the inital purpose of Cell Research just to statiate your fucking curiosity.

You know, I'm no angel, but these are the types of comments that aren't needed here. It's okay to have an opposing point of view but does it need to be expressed this way, especially seeing as how provacation was virtually non-existent? "Fuck you, you fucking pretentious bitch"? Is this sexist or at least deserve a warning from a mod?

 

As far as the she-males go...

 

Technology can be a wonderful thing, it can be a dangerous and sick thing. There has to be limits and boundaries where it concerns good taste. I don't think anyone wants she-males and just because you CAN create something doesn't always mean you SHOULD.

[Guest Choken One]

It had nothing to do with her gender. If it were a male...It would of been "Prententious fucking bastard"...

[Guest JMA]

Who exactly were you adressing, Choken?

[Guest Choken One]

The british anti-abortion girl.

[Guest Crux]

Imagine the poor kid growing up knowing it was a "she-male." That's just not kosher.

[Guest Vyce]

Fuck you, You fucking pretentious bitch...No one cares what your Anti-Abortion Christian fundamentalist ass says.

I find it hilariously ironic (or is that ironically hilarious?) that you criticize her intolerance in this fashion.

[Guest El Satanico]

Is there any reason why anyone would WANT to create baby shemales?

 

Any reason at all?

Yes...

 

We really wouldn't want to know these reasons...so lets just keep it to...yes.

[Guest El Satanico]

After actually reading the article...all of you are overreacting based on what others said about the research.

 

The only people talking about creating she-males were the anti abortion people and the people outraged by the experiment.

 

The scientists never talked about wanting to create she-male babies. There was no "omg these scientists are insane and must be stopped" parts in that article.

 

She-males just happened to be a by product of thier research.