Guest TheGame2705 Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Yes, Shane's not bad at all... That was fucking stupid. Shane's return is beating the crap out of the second most over heel on RAW. Built up as a monster for weeks now, he gets taken down by SHANE FUCKING MCMAHON. I personally don't think any McMahon has pissed me off as much as him.
Guest Spaceman Spiff Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Those were some weak looking punches on the outside, too. Why don't they make Heat a McMahon & associates exclusive show? Put Vince, Steph, Shane, Sable, Gowan, Hogan, etc. on it. That way we won't have them running rampant all over the main shows.
Guest Anglesault Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I fucking hate it. Shane McMahon comes back to waste twenty minutes a week playing "30 year old who thinks he's 15" on th mic so he can go and take a PPV match away from a WRESTLER. Yippee.
Guest BionicRedneck Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I am just confused as to why everyone complains about McMahons on TV all the time and then rejoices when Shane comes back.
Guest Choken One Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I fucking hate it. Shane McMahon comes back to waste twenty minutes a week playing "30 year old who thinks he's 15" on th mic so he can go and take a PPV match away from a WRESTLER. Yippee. Wrestler like Gowan?
Guest Army Eye Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 No surprise to me. During the invasion he was physically dominating actual wrestlers and making them be scared of him too.
Guest JRE Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 To be fair....all he did was surprise attack Kane and then hit him with a chair 3 times...
Guest Mulatto Heat Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I am just confused as to why everyone complains about McMahons on TV all the time and then rejoices when Shane comes back. "Because he, in the carefully promoted, condensed, WWE brand way, is ENTERTAINING!"
Guest Lil Naitch Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 And then Kane no- sold it at the end. Plus, Shane actually PUTS OVER TALENT, and knows when to STAY OFF TV, unlike the rest of the family.
Guest NoCalMike Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Personally I have to say Linda is the least harmful to the show. She usually comes out makes an announcement and is done for 6 months. Vince/Steph are obviously the worst, and Shane is behind them. Linda is indeed boring, but her actual actions on the show are the least offensive to my wrestling fan perspective.
Guest Anglesault Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 To be fair....all he did was surprise attack Kane and then hit him with a chair 3 times... No reason for him to be on TV. Kane-Wrestler Shane-Not. Plus, Shane actually PUTS OVER TALENT, and knows when to STAY OFF TV, unlike the rest of the family. No he doesn't. He's on TV now. He shouldn't be on TV now and depriving someone of a PPV pay check.
Guest BionicRedneck Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Who is to say who should and shouldn't be on TV?
Guest Human Fly Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Shane does put on an entertaining match though. True he might take away a match from a wrestler, but it is a wrestler on the Raw brand. I'd rather watch a Shane match than what ever other crap they would put out there instead.
Guest webmasterofwrestlegame Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I think Shane vs. Kane would be good though, providing Shane puts himself into 'put body on line with mad bumps to get wrestler over but a few weeks later all momentum will be lost and forgot' mode.
Guest Vyce Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I'm sorry - Kane laughing after getting slapped around by a NON-WRESTLER who hasn't even had a match in.....at least a year and a half....is NOT my idea of Kane maintaining his heat. Kane should have fucking destroyed EVERYONE out there. Austin, Vince, Shane. THE MONSTER SHOULD NOT BE SELLING FOR THE BOSS' SON.
Guest CanadianChick Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I've got a question. This is a little off-topic, but bear with me: If Kane is wrestling Shane at SS, who is RVD going to wrestle?
Guest Anglesault Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Who is to say who should and shouldn't be on TV? Well, normally, on a wrestling show, wrestlers should be on TV over the webmaster or whatever Shane's title is now.
Guest Anglesault Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I've got a question. This is a little off-topic, but bear with me: If Kane is wrestling Shane at SS, who is RVD going to wrestle? Shane probably got RVD kicked off the show. Don't you just LOVE that Shane? What a team player!
NYU Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I've got a question. This is a little off-topic, but bear with me: If Kane is wrestling Shane at SS, who is RVD going to wrestle? Come on. This is SO obvious !! ...... ...... ......he won't be wrestling. The man does have a concussion, thanks to the man who can destroy RVD but get punked out by the boss' son. RVD get a high-profile match on a PPV....instead of Shane.... Hilarious!
Guest CanadianChick Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I've got a question. This is a little off-topic, but bear with me: If Kane is wrestling Shane at SS, who is RVD going to wrestle? Shane probably got RVD kicked off the show. Don't you just LOVE that Shane? What a team player! Better yet: RVD/Shane vs. Kane/Vince. Remember, it's not a big show without a McMahon! THe more the better.
Guest BionicRedneck Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 What if the wrestler is less entertaining than Shane? Oh, and that McMahon/Austin feud a couple of years ago was useless too right? Damn those non-wrestlers! Seriously, though, I get your point. My point was that non-wrestlers do have a place on TV if they are entertaining and popular.
chaosrage Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I'm sorry - Kane laughing after getting slapped around by a NON-WRESTLER who hasn't even had a match in.....at least a year and a half....is NOT my idea of Kane maintaining his heat. Kane should have fucking destroyed EVERYONE out there. Austin, Vince, Shane. THE MONSTER SHOULD NOT BE SELLING FOR THE BOSS' SON. But he didn't sell. You saw how unaffected he was by all of it at the end. And why does it make a difference if he's the boss's son? He's a pissed off guy (who looks a lot bigger than the last time we saw him) that dove at Kane, who by the way wasn't expecting it. Then he kept hitting him with hard chair shots. You know this won't lead to Shane winning like it probably would if it was Vince, and you know it'll probably be a good match. So what's the problem?
Guest Retro Rob Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Were we watching the same show? Yeah Shane hit the guy with a chair four times, but he then no sold the shots and going through a table. Makes Kane look better than he did going in IMO.
Guest Askewniverse Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I've got a question. This is a little off-topic, but bear with me: If Kane is wrestling Shane at SS, who is RVD going to wrestle? RVD will probably be stuck on Heat wrestling Lance Storm or Rodney Mack.
ChrisMWaters Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 How do we know for sure that Shane is going to actually wrestle? For all we know...Shane may just become RVD's manager for this feud.
NYU Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Austin wanted Kane to hurt him. Kane refused, kind of hurting his bad-ass reputation. Then Shane came in. Clotheslined Kane over the top rope to the floor. Kane tried to go up the ramp and leave. Shane kept hitting him with the steel chair shots, with Kane getting HURT from each one. Then, he knocked him off the stage through the table. After about 10 seconds, Kane sat up and smiled. Maybe it's just me, but I don't see a MONSTER there.
Guest NoCalMike Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 If people accept shane because he takes a monster bump, then I am willing to bet there is at least 10-20 other wrestlers that would be willing to take the same bumps, but also work a match up to that point that garners interest.. It is lame how Shane shows up every 6 months takes a MONSTER BUMP and gets all the props for it. Then dissapears again for 6 monnths. It's called showing up the talent, and bringing the talent down a few notches. Basically it is saying, Oh Mick Foley was great and all, but watch ME, I AM A MCMAHON, WATCH THIS ASSHOLES. Hell I could fall of a 30ft platform once every 6 months if I was paid to do so.
Guest buffybeast Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Shane looked amazingly good out there tonight. I am torn on the Shane issue. As much as I love him, I know his presence can deprive wrestlers of valuable tv time.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now