Guest Shaved Bear Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 well i have my guesses on who your voting for
Guest Singular Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 HAll and NAsh without a doubt. Especially since they are getting payed so much more than say Ric Flair, who is actually making a contribution to the WWF as a co-owner. Hogan is different. He get's mad pops from the crowd for some reason, so he is a draw. I think I read that he is gettting 1 million per year on his WWF contract so something. The only time I would agree that Hogan needs to go is if he becomes Champion, in which case I wil not continue to watch WWF. Hogan has no place as WWF champion ever again. From what I've read about Smackdown spoilers, it looks like it could happen.
Guest Austin3164life Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 I asked my friend today how the Smackdown taping was. He went last night here in Rochester, NY. He told me that people cheered for Hogan, but not as much as he expected it to be. He even admitted that Rock didn't get cheered much (Huge Rock-Mark). Hogan's pops could be enhanced, but that could be my assumption. He has gotten some monster pops, but the nostalgia fest can't last forever. Like someone said earlier, if Hogan wins the Unified Championship, I'm changing the channel and watching Jimmy's Outdoor World on ESPN......
Guest Kahran Ramsus Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 Hogan has a place as a special attraction in the midcard, not main eventing.
Guest RetroRob215 Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 I say Nash because at least the rest of them contribute (as in wrestling) in some way to the overall product.
Guest starvenger Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 >Hogan has a place as a special attraction in the midcard, not main eventing. True, but I gotta admit, he works about as hard as he can. Granted, that's not much, but better than Big Lazy Bitch, by far.
Guest Tony149 Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 I also said Nash. The others except Hogan (For being over) & HHH (For his run in 2000) are waste as well. Big Show, Mark Henry, Mr. Perfect, Godfather & Goldust are others who could be considered a waste of money.
Guest JHawk Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 Bossman! If you're puking in the corner two minutes into the match, you're forcing me to change the channel!
Guest El Satanico Posted April 4, 2002 Report Posted April 4, 2002 Big Show needs to be on that list too. Oh and Mark Henry. Didn't both of them sign like 10 year contracts? But Nash would still be the right answer. Since he is a waste of money AND can be a bad influence backstage. The others besides Hogan and HHH don't really have any real power. However Hogan(for time being) and HHH has made WWF money so can't be considered a waste.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now