Guest buffybeast Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 I don't hate either. But Nash is a complete waste of space and money. He's not even entertaining on the mic anymore. BTW, Shaved Bear, what the hell is that in your sig? I don't recall the Predator dancing when he killed people. LOL
Guest Shaved Bear Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 my sig is a gif of predator eating someone, but it looks as if hes dancing
Guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 At this point in time; I'd have to say Triple H after the last few months of the "Chris Jericho Marmoreal title Reign."
Guest snowfan Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 AArdvark is definitely ahead by a "nose"... I mean Nash while a total waste of airtime does not exert the same influence in keeping good wrestlers off my set. HGH is...just...THAT...intense...
Guest RetroRob215 Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 I have to pick Nash because at least Triple H wrestles.
Guest Brian Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 It's like everyone had an epiphany the minute they saw Triple H couldn't wrestle like he used to.
Guest snowfan Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 It's like everyone had an epiphany the minute they saw Triple H couldn't wrestle like he used to. You are mostly right. Aardvark is hardly a "wrestler" these days and his sloth like mobility and "engaging" manner on the mic just makes it easier for most people to see what his detractors have been saying all along- he is overrated and a taker not a giver. Who else can he squash among the MEs to try to steal some more heat? ???
Guest chirs3 Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 I loathe Triple H. -He murdered (figuratively) Chris Jericho. -For a long stretch of time before his injury, he owned the 20 minute promo every show. -He nosold a 50 foot drop in a car. -His masterminding of Austin's car-hit led to Big Show winning the title. -And much much more.
Guest J*ingus Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 HHH was a great wrestler from the end of 1999 until his injury, and that string of very good PPV matches counteracts a lot of bad things in my book. Let's all hope that he can return to the level he was once at. But Nash? He was easily a worse backstage politician and held more people down that HHH ever did, and he did it while having a grand total of five or six good matches in his life. He's worse than useless, he's a liability to any company that hires him.
Guest Mystery Eskimo Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Nash. HHH has had some very good matches in the past, and who knows, he might again. Nash never has and never will.
Guest Dr. Wrestlingphysics Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Nash. While both are backstage politicians and have been guilty of holding other wrestlers down, HHH has (pre injury) often produced the goods in the ring whereas Nash never has.
Guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 is this even a question, HHH has had some really quality matches in the past. Nash on the other hand is hard for even the best workers to carry to more than a passable competition and hes always been like that.
Guest razazteca Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Nash has done nothing as a member of the nWo but make 2 above average promos. HHH maybe evil but at least he can cut a promo
Guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Nash hasnt done anything that I've liked since the ORIGINAL nWo. HHH has kept me watching for some time now.
Guest ManKinnd Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 How can you possibly hate HHH more than Nash? At least HHH DID have good matches; remember his feuds with Austin, Rock, Foley, and even Jericho? Did everyone forget those classics like 3 stages of Hell, the Ironman, Last Man Standing, and the Street Fight? Nash never did anything worth watching that wasn't against Shawn Michaels.
Guest Shaved Bear Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 all i know is that Nash couldnt draw heat if he sat on a radiator
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 I WANT TO PICK BOTH. BUT.......... HHH is a backstabber who is fucking toe boss's daughter. everybody used to say how HHH was a great wrestle pre injury i DISAGREE he was a wrestler who could work a good match and was a wrestler who was easliely carried to a great match. but i never recall him having a great match against a sub-par wrestler
Guest Big McLargeHuge Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 what no Hogan? I'd have picked him, but I went with Nash.
Guest alfdogg Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 DAMN...this is tough. I have to say HHH though.
Guest Some Guy Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Nash has always been hated by the Smarks for both his politicing and his ahem.. less than stellar workrate. HHH was a God in 2000 in the ring according to most of the Smarks which caused some forgiveness for his politicing. So I vote for Big Daddy Bitch.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 everybody used to say how HHH was a great wrestle pre injury i DISAGREE he was a wrestler who could work a good match and was a wrestler who was easliely carried to a great match. but i never recall him having a great match against a sub-par wrestler
Guest Some Guy Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 HHH was never as good as he was made out to be IMO, but he was quite good at selling and carrying the flow of a match, 2 essentials for a heel. His match with TAKA on Raw in early 2000 were a good example of how well he could sell a match, the fans were popping like crazy becasue they thought TAKA was actually going to win and when he didn't they hated HHH even more (in a good way).
Guest Singular Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Get rid of both of them. HHH hasn't done shit since he got back from him injury. His matches are nowhere near the level they were before his injury. Even before his injury, HHH couldn't really carry people too well. Put HHH in the ring with someone like Rock or Angle or Austin and it's fine but put him in with Big Show, or Taker, and it gets a little messy. Nash is just worthless. I have a question regarding smackdown. How does the WWF rank their roster? I mean, Hogan lost his only singles match in the WWF to Rock, and yet he is number 1 contender?
Guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 I would have to go with HHH. At least Nash is out of the way at the moment and I don't see him have any kind of stroke with Vince McMahon anymore. However, HHH has done nothing of worth since his much hyped comeback. I've never liked HHH but he used to be able to wrestle a good match. He hasn't had ONE since he came back in Jan. I've also got to go for HHH because of the way he destroyed Rob Van Dam's heat at the Royal Rumble by giving him a Pedigree and it taking him out for the rest of his time in the match. Has it been him who has been silencing the RVD chants? If not who has and why? How's afraid of RVD's talent the most?
Guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 I honestly like Nash, he's a big ugly goof who has never been a great wrestler and it's obvious he knows it. To me HHH is an average wrestler who thinks he is superior to everyone, I'm rooting for Hogan for the Title, you have to ride the wave when it's high, then have hogan lose it at the King of the Ring and have him gracefully become a commisioner type role and have him rarely act as a competitor.
Guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Posted April 5, 2002 Kevin Nash is better on the mic then Triple H but he can't even come close to being on the same Level Triple H is/Was in the ring. Only Good matches Nash has even had was against Shawn Michaels & Bret Hart.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now