Guest Anglesault Report post Posted April 5, 2002 Because this board is rife with stupid marks. And it's also full of arrogant jackasses who think they know everything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 5, 2002 >>>And it's also full of arrogant jackasses who think they know everything.<<< Anglesault, I was acknowledging you when I mentioned "stupid marks," but if you want to include yourself THAT bad....Geez, some people need ALL the attention. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted April 5, 2002 >>>And it's also full of arrogant jackasses who think they know everything.<<< Anglesault, I was acknowledging you when I mentioned "stupid marks," but if you want to include yourself THAT bad....Geez, some people need ALL the attention. Oh wow, an "That's not me, that's you!" insult! are we in fifth grade again? Or maybe is this your first time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 5, 2002 To those of you who despise Triple H and are extremely voiciferous in your passion, thank you for thouroughly ruining this thread for me. I would have liked to have been able to post my thoughts upon Steve Austin and his character, but after reading your numerous posts I have become to sick to do so. I am officially issuing all of you a challenge. Supply me with evidence. One piece of substantial evidence. Do me a favor and look up the word before you toss me any more of your conspiracy theories. You state everything that you say as if it were factual but you have never backed any of it up with anything other then speculation. This is insane. It seems like I am reading the posts of children. Show me some video footage of Triple H in the board room bad mouthing other wrestlers. Let me hear an audio recording of the man verbally burying another wrestler. Give me a valid report from someone else who is in on these meetings that Triple H is abusing 'his power'. I will accept anything. So long as it is factual evidence. At this rate, I doubt I will ever see anything other then a response wherein you tear apart my post and tell me about how 'this happened on this date to this person which corresponds with the full moon glistening off of an abandoned warehouse out in the middle of nowhere so it must mean this and if you cannot see that then you do not know anything'. Excuse me for being skeptical. Logic and reason seem to be entwined in my nature. I like to have a bit of proof to back up what I believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Human Fly Report post Posted April 5, 2002 "To those of you who despise Triple H and are extremely voiciferous in your passion, thank you for thouroughly ruining this thread for me. I would have liked to have been able to post my thoughts upon Steve Austin and his character, but after reading your numerous posts I have become to sick to do so." No one's stopping you from giving your Steve Austin thoughts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted April 5, 2002 So, in other words, I'll never see you bashing ANYONE, anyone at all, not Taker, not Hogan, not Nash, based on what they are "supposedly" doing backstage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dangerous A Report post Posted April 5, 2002 "So, in other words, I'll never see you bashing ANYONE, anyone at all, not Taker, not Hogan, not Nash, based on what they are "supposedly" doing backstage." The Anglesault's got a point here LoganHex. However I think we should all recognize and respect the fact that most of the posts that bash HHH or Taker or Hogan are OPINIONS. If someone chooses to base their opinions on speculation, they are free to do that on this board. Some of the opinions based on speculation are outrageous, but smarks are entitled to them. I share LoganHex's thoughts that I don't like to base opinions until there is some hardcore proof, but I think the speculation part is part of the fun of being a smark. I am also a little guilty of making a judgement based on 3rd and 4th hand info. You almost can't help it if you post here regularly. All I can say LoganHex is keep expressing yourself and don't follow. If your opinion happens to be against the grain of the board, fine. A lot of mine are too. I think it is refreshing when someone takes a look at things from the "other side of things". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 5, 2002 How did the topic change to Triple H anyway. hmm. ::reminesces, too lazy to go back and se:: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted April 5, 2002 I don't understand why some of you are getting so worked up about which wrestler gets pushed and which doesn't. These guys are getting paids thousands (some millions) to have fun on TV no matter what script/role/push/program. Why get so concerned about a millionaire's problems? ??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Human Fly Report post Posted April 5, 2002 "I don't understand why some of you are getting so worked up about which wrestler gets pushed and which doesn't. These guys are getting paids thousands (some millions) to have fun on TV no matter what script/role/push/program. Why get so concerned about a millionaire's problems?" I think people are concerned because they are the ones who are watching the millionaires. Maybe they would rather see millionaire 1 or 2 then have millionaire 5 rammed down their throats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered Report post Posted April 5, 2002 ARGH anOTHER thread Dominated by HHH! The Conspiracy Grows! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted April 5, 2002 i'd identify it more as a bit of a slump than losing his edge. his interview on 'raw' wasn't spectacular, but it still easily blew away any other interview on the show. with the fans cheering him again, he doesn't have his back to the wall like he had with his heel turn & isn't forced to be trying new things. right now he's sticking with what works. nothing wrong with that. his in-ring work, post-rumble, has been very mediocre, not even comparable to his 2001 run, but austin's overcome obstacles before, & the obstacles were a lot more serious than a bad streak of matches. if he gets a really great opponent again, it'll probably re-awaken his god-like ability to work a match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Risk Report post Posted April 5, 2002 To quote Steve Austin... "My name is 'Stone Cold' Steve Austin and I don't deserve this!" He's right, this is a thread about Steve Austin. Not Triple H. TALK ABOUT STEVE AUSTIN. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered Report post Posted April 5, 2002 i liked stunning steve austin better than stone cold Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Risk Report post Posted April 5, 2002 "Stunning" Steve Austin did a sweet theme. He and Pillman were the REAL two man power-trip. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy Report post Posted April 5, 2002 "Stunning" Steve Austin did a sweet theme. He and Pillman were the REAL two man power-trip. Yeah but without the backstage power to stay together, sadly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered Report post Posted April 5, 2002 god i loved the hollywood blondes. i just got Tributes (by meltzer) and i really liked the one on brian pillman, all though so far the ones on the von erichs are the best. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites