Damaramu Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Michigan........YOU NEED 3 TOUCHDOWNS! GET THEM!
Damaramu Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 I swear Michigan's pass coverage sucks.
CanadianChris Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 USC unquestionably has the best wideouts in the country. The catches I've seen them make this season have been unbelievable.
Guest Flyboy Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 What a catch that was. Mike Williams' catch was still better, but it still was a great catch.
Guest Flyboy Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 USC unquestionably has the best wideouts in the country. The catches I've seen them make this season have been unbelievable. Yeah. The only trio that even comes close is Texas' wideouts.
Damaramu Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Ok Michigan..........ah hell I don't know what you can do now.
ANKLELOCK Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 HOW DID THESE GUYS LOSE TO CAL? USC=BEST TEAM IVE SEEN IN A COUPLE OF YEARS!! (I haven't seen them play until today)
Damaramu Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 I'm having bad flashbacks of the Big XII title game. Michigan is going to make a drive that lasts half the quarter and then........throw an endzone interception.........
Guest Flyboy Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 HOW DID THESE GUYS LOSE TO CAL? It was triple OT and USC's defense was not into the game. That was the only game that USC allowed a 100 yd. rusher.
CanadianChris Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 HOW DID THESE GUYS LOSE TO CAL? Barely. Coming off a bye, on the road, took Cal's best effort of the year and still only lost in triple-OT.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Michigan cant sustain a drive for more than 3 minutes though so that (possession for half a quarter before throwing an int) aint happening.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 They had to come back down three scores to force OT IIRC at that.
HarleyQuinn Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Michigan's getting a good drive here, down to the 31
MarvinisaLunatic Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 I thought for sure that Michigan would at least BE IN the game and make it close, but this is just crazy. SACK #6
Damaramu Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Michigan needs a TD here....then they need to score when they have the ball again.....and oh.........DON'T LET USC SCORE AGAIN!
ANKLELOCK Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Does anyone here realize that USC will have this exact same team next season? They are nothing but Freshmen and Sophmores! WOW I hate to seem like its a foregone conclusion, but as of right now, USC = 2004 National Champions. Am I overlooking any big players they are gonna lose? I don't think so.
Guest Flyboy Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 USC=BEST TEAM IVE SEEN IN A COUPLE OF YEARS!! (I haven't seen them play until today) Did you see Miami's team the year when they SPANKED Nebraska in the National Championship?
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Does anyone here realize that USC will have this exact same team next season? They are nothing but Freshmen and Sophmores! WOW I hate to seem like its a foregone conclusion, but as of right now, USC = 2004 National Champions. Am I overlooking any big players they are gonna lose? I don't think so. Two things: 1. The computer likes to screw Pac-10 teams 2. Their QB is making me think Carson Palmer was a system QB (Well...I already thought that) and that the Bengals are holding a BUST.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 I think it would be more of a moral victory if they managed to kick a FG here and put points up on the board finally but its not like 3 points is going to make that much difference down 21 so they might as well go for it.
Guest Flyboy Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 2. Their QB is making me think Carson Palmer was a system QB (Well...I already thought that) and that the Bengals are holding a BUST. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out, bps.
Damaramu Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Does anyone here realize that USC will have this exact same team next season? They are nothing but Freshmen and Sophmores! WOW I hate to seem like its a foregone conclusion, but as of right now, USC = 2004 National Champions. Am I overlooking any big players they are gonna lose? I don't think so. Two things: 1. The computer likes to screw Pac-10 teams 2. Their QB is making me think Carson Palmer was a system QB (Well...I already thought that) and that the Bengals are holding a BUST. Well the computer can't really screw anything. If it's anything it's that the Pac-10's teams are weak so they don't get a high SOS. You really need to be in the SEC or Big XII to get the best SOS.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 ohh..PI on USC. USC helps keep the Michigan drive alive. TD Michigan!
ANKLELOCK Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Miami was a VERY good team in 2001. But that WAS a couple of years ago. I still can't fathom USC losing to Cal. Cal gave up 49 to Va Tech. How did USC not put up 70 on those guys?
HarleyQuinn Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 TD Michigan...too bad USC'll answer with a TD of their own *grins wickedly*
HarleyQuinn Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 *looks up from reading "Odd Thomas" by Koontz to USC on the verge of another TD*
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 I saw that fumble coming the moment the QB released the ball. Lucky it went out of bounds for them
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now