New JBL WWE.Com Column

[Guest MikeSC]

I find it funny that most who hate Clinton for what he did, if asked about Thomas Jefferson, would probably have nothing but good things to say about him since he was a founding father...

 

I guess having multiple kids with a slave out of wedlock is less serious that getting blow from a fat jewish girl

Well, history time:

 

Thomas Jefferson DID NOT father children out of wedlock with a slave. A Jefferson DID --- but according to almost EVERY historian, Thomas is the LEAST likely suspect.

-=Mike

[NoCalMike 0]

Bradshaw's rant was acceptable.

 

I only take issue with the fact that he thinks Stern is ok because he is not "breaking any of the rules" yet when it comes to Moore, he should just shut up even though techinically he isn't breaking any of the rules either. Some people hate Moore, some hate Stern, but neither are breaking the rules.

[Lil' Bitch 0]

Are you referring to "poor Vader" as in the same Vader who snapped for no reason and attacked a news reporter? Yeah, poor Vader.

 

He was in character though.

[Scroby 0]

You know it would have been nice if he actually talked about what he did but instead he talked around what he did over in Germany. What he talked about is stuff that happen in the past that is sorta close to what he did but he didn't talk about the incident itself. I think he also forgot that The Producers is also a Mel Brooks film and Mel Brooks is Jewish.

 

Now I don't agree with what he's gotta say about Clinton's book, because honestly if it was only about the scandal then it wouldn't be over 900 pages longer. Funny thing through Clinton's book is longer than a Harry Potter book but both books are about a kid and his magic wand (working in the Letterman joke, alright.)

 

So if he thinks Moore is stupid and should shut up, does that mean Bradshaw should stop wrestling cause just about everybody says Bradshaw sucks?

[Guest MikeSC]

You know it would have been nice if he actually talked about what he did but instead he talked around what he did over in Germany. What he talked about is stuff that happen in the past that is sorta close to what he did but he didn't talk about the incident itself.  I think he also forgot that The Producers is also a Mel Brooks film and Mel Brooks is Jewish.

If it's so offensive he has to be fired for it --- then it shouldn't MATTER who does it.

-=Mike

[Scroby 0]

QUOTE 

You know it would have been nice if he actually talked about what he did but instead he talked around what he did over in Germany. What he talked about is stuff that happen in the past that is sorta close to what he did but he didn't talk about the incident itself.  I think he also forgot that The Producers is also a Mel Brooks film and Mel Brooks is Jewish. 

 

 

If it's so offensive he has to be fired for it --- then it shouldn't MATTER who does it.

-=Mike

 

Well yes and no...No because I don't think he knew it was against the law there and was for entertainment value and Yes because there's really a time and a place for it. (yeah I really had nothing to go with on the convo.)

[SuperJerk 0]

I agree 100% with what Bradshaw said about Clinton.

[Blade2kxx 0]

Now I don't agree with what he's gotta say about Clinton's book, because honestly if it was only about the scandal then it wouldn't be over 900 pages longer. Funny thing through Clinton's book is longer than a Harry Potter book but both books are about a kid and his magic wand (working in the Letterman joke, alright.)

says Bradshaw sucks?

Actually, what I think he meant was that with his book coming out, attention is back on Clinton.

 

But, rather than talking about his works as the President, or the rest of his life, all the media recollection is about his affair.

[Guest Junkyard Willie]

A number of years ago, WWE was attacked in the same way by people in the media. We not only stayed within the rules, we never portrayed certain things and stayed away from using household items because we had a social conscientiousness that most shows didn’t. Yet we were attacked. If you don’t like the content, like these people claimed, you should argue against the rules, not people abiding by those very rules.

 

As soon as I read that I had flashbacks to Stephanie comparing the U.S.'s prosecution of her father to the Taliban attacking the WTC.

[jester 0]

A number of years ago, WWE was attacked in the same way by people in the media. We not only stayed within the rules, we never portrayed certain things and stayed away from using household items because we had a social conscientiousness that most shows didn’t.

 

For example, WWE never showed people getting hit by chairs, trashcan lids or cookie sheets, or being put through tables that you could find in any school.

 

Bradshaw is a moron. If he's referring to the incident with the so-called wrestling death and the Parents Television Council, he's just passed by some LEGIT ammo for his arguments (such as that the PTC was forced to apologize and compensate WWE for their baseless allegations and attempts to scare away advertisers) in order to make a ridiculously wrong point.