Guest Donners Report post Posted August 14, 2004 It's a step in the right direction, with two PPV-quality matches (on paper, at least) and big names in all the others. That's a significant improvement and a possible sign of better things to come, but some just rush for the negatives. So, a show with potential that sucks is better than a show with no potential that sucks? -=Mike Of course, because it has the potential to not suck in the future whereas a show that sucked without potential has no saving grace. Not that I would agree this show sucked, but regardless, the point stands that it showed positive signs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
