Jingus 0 Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Kerry to Bush: "I can't believe people are defending your nonexistant military record while attacking mine, you deserter." Bush to Kerry: "Hey look everyone, it's Al Gore without the brains!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Here's a novel concept: have the two president candidates focus on what they will bring to the nation instead of trying to sling mud at one another! Hurrah! Actually Bush HAS been doing that. Of course Kerry's reply: 'George Bush is ignoring the real issue, and that is Iraq' (or is it his Guard service? Tune into C-BS News to find out!) I will admit though I'd be curious to see what a Bush/Edwards battle would comprise of. Maybe Edwards would return to his more idea-driven platform instead of morphing into John Kerry Jr. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted September 17, 2004 His light saber will be powered by rechargeable batteries... No solar power, and the Death Star would be the size of a Volkswagen Beetle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Hardly. President Bush is more like the equivalent of Han Solo. Bold, daring, but isn't the brightest of the group and tends to piss off a lot of people. Kerry would be, uh, like Grand Moff Tarken or some other similar generic Imperial commander. Is Colin Powell Lando Calrisen (sp)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Can anybody think of an election worse than this one? 1976. I'll take Bush or Kerry far over Ford or Carter. -=Mike Granted, that one came to mind, because that is indeed really really shitty. My point was more towards how these campaigns are operating, the issues they're dealing with, the surrounding personalities, scandal and fingerpointing, muckraking bullshit. It's really horrible to watch. AoO, this is, honestly, NOTHING compared to 19h Century campaigns. THOSE were vicious. -=Mike ...Read up on the two Adams/Jackson races --- you'll see ugly politics... What about Preston Brooks caning Charles Sumner on the floor of the Senate? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Can anybody think of an election worse than this one? 1976. I'll take Bush or Kerry far over Ford or Carter. -=Mike Granted, that one came to mind, because that is indeed really really shitty. My point was more towards how these campaigns are operating, the issues they're dealing with, the surrounding personalities, scandal and fingerpointing, muckraking bullshit. It's really horrible to watch. AoO, this is, honestly, NOTHING compared to 19h Century campaigns. THOSE were vicious. -=Mike ...Read up on the two Adams/Jackson races --- you'll see ugly politics... What about Preston Brooks caning Charles Sumner on the floor of the Senate? Do they have statues of Preston Brooks in South Carolina? just kidding.. yeah Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Actually Bush HAS been doing that. That's why there were no attacks on Bush during the DNC and the RNC was a virtual smear campaign on John Kerry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted September 17, 2004 Actually Bush HAS been doing that. That's why there were no attacks on Bush during the DNC and the RNC was a virtual smear campaign on John Kerry. Actually, the DNC ripped Bush a lot. Carter's speech was nothing but Bush bashing. His was just, you know, insufferbly dull and delivered by the most inept President we've had. BTW, should we be concerned that according to one of the experts CBS tried to use to verify the memos --- they were TONS of documents they handed him --- not just the 4 they used. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
