Taker666 Posted January 24, 2005 Report Posted January 24, 2005 "Theres good news for Smackdown this week anyway.The 1/20 edition of Smackdown did a 3.8 broadcast rating, with a 5.7 share. That is the second week in a row that the show has done a 3.8 and will have the creative team doing cartwheels up at Titan Towers. My take on this is that WWE is benefiting from no Survivor on CBS and the anything-but-Friends-like Joey at 8 p.m. on NBC, along with the losing-luster Apprentice. Also, this week CSI aired a repeat, which had to help as well." Kurt/JBL/Amy Vs Big Show/Joy = ratings?
UseTheSledgehammerUh Posted January 24, 2005 Report Posted January 24, 2005 How is the good news? A truly dreadful, embarassing show with little athletic compeition, predictable/embarassing angles, and both horrible (JBL, Bashams) or stale/uninteresting workers (Cena, Funaki) holding title belts gets a "good" rating? That will just keep them doing the same thing.
Art Sandusky Posted January 24, 2005 Report Posted January 24, 2005 1999 Raw/Heat/Smackdowns were extremely volatile shows that dared you to try and make sense of what went on from week to week, and the numbers were huge.
Taker666 Posted January 24, 2005 Author Report Posted January 24, 2005 How is the good news? A truly dreadful, embarassing show with little athletic compeition, predictable/embarassing angles, and both horrible (JBL, Bashams) or stale/uninteresting workers (Cena, Funaki) holding title belts gets a "good" rating? That will just keep them doing the same thing. eh, I enjoyed the show. sue me.
UseTheSledgehammerUh Posted January 24, 2005 Report Posted January 24, 2005 The Rey/Chavo match was okay, if not marred by an annoying commercial break. Cena/Dupree was like watching two backyarders try to put a match together. SO SLOW and PLODDING. The main event stuff is getting old. Big Show gets beaten down/bloodied AGAIN... And gotta love those Bashams.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now