Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
CanadianChris

BCS Standings - Week 1

Recommended Posts

1. USC

2. Texas

3. Virginia Tech

4. Georgia

5. Alabama

6. LSU

7. Texas Tech

8. Miami

9. UCLA

10. Penn State

11. Florida State

12. Boston College

 

It's too bad Penn State lost this past weekend, because I would have been very interested to see their placement if they were still undefeated.

 

Notre Dame, incidentally, is 16th. They get an automatic at-large if they have nine wins and a top-12 BCS ranking at the end of the season (which means they need to win every remaining game).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah well, they used to take SoS into account, but people bitched and they dropped it... just like they used to take magrin of victory into account, but people bitched and they dropped that.

 

It's fucked either way. Just Old Yeller the system already

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest I miss Test.

Ah, so USC is also #1 in these.

 

All college coaches should teach their players to pitch the ball out of bounds during 2-minute drills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest I miss Test.

I didn't know last year's record counted.

 

I guess the Patriots deserve every tiebreaker in the AFC this year, due to their domination in 2004.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the rest of the Top 25:

 

13. Oregon

14. Wisconsin

15. Ohio State

16. Notre Dame

17. West Virginia

18. Auburn

19. Tennessee

20. Florida

21. TCU

22. Minnesota

23. Nebraska

24. Michigan State

25. California

 

Notre Dame has terrible computer numbers. By the computers only they are #25 overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Texas Tech will be exposed soon enough. And Notre Dame is a better team than a lost of the higher ranked teams but they do have 2 losses and that win against Michigan is that big anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's the margin of victory thing again. For all the computers know, Notre Dame could have lost to USC by 30 and Michigan State by 27. The idea that they can't have some capped margin of victory standard involved in the computer rankings is ridiculous.

 

If they capped it at 28 points, they wouldn't have to worry about poor Rice getting 100 points rung up on them by Texas, but they wouldn't take away crucial information from the computers' determinations.

 

Using the Sagarin ratings again as an example, since they're convenient for me to find, the "official" Sagarin rankings used by the BCS that don't take margin of victory into account have Notre Dame at 23, whereas Sagarin's real rankings of which teams are best have the Irish at 12.

 

Also, since margin of victory is incorporated in terms of what opponent was faced and not blindly as some naively assume, Texas Tech has actually been helped by the flaws in the system. The official BCS rankings that only take into account games played have Texas Tech at 6, while Sagarin's real ratings have Tech at 8 and his "pure points" rankings have them at 16. This is because Tech's poor performances against Kansas and Nebraska would actually affect them much more than whether they blew out I-AA teams as they were expected to.

 

Oh, and for the record, Texas Tech's SOS is ranked 138th, falling behind several I-AA teams, and ranking below any team ranked in the Top 80. If you look at I-A teams exclusively, Texas Tech's SOS is second to last, leading only Arkansas State.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah well, they used to take SoS into account, but people bitched and they dropped it... just like they used to take magrin of victory into account, but people bitched and they dropped that.

 

It's fucked either way.  Just Old Yeller the system already

 

I've said it before.

The computers put OU into the title game over USC when the humans would have the USC/LSU matchup. ESPN and everyone cries loudly that humans should mean more.

The humans mean more and put Texas into the Rose Bowl over Cal. ESPN and everyone cries and moans loudly again that the humans are screwing it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
I didn't know last year's record counted.

 

I guess the Patriots deserve every tiebreaker in the AFC this year, due to their domination in 2004.

You have a team that hasn't lost in a LONG time. They still haven't lost this season. They've beaten some decent teams and have a team that seems to play well against everybody.

 

How can you justify not having them first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If there were Playoffs, people would still bitch about the 4 or 8 teams that get in.

A team that finishes 9th (at 9-3 or something like that) and misses an 8-team playoff has a lot less to bitch about than a team that finished 3rd at 12-0 and misses a 2-team playoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If there were Playoffs, people would still bitch about the 4 or 8 teams that get in.

A team that finishes 9th (at 9-3 or something like that) and misses an 8-team playoff has a lot less to bitch about than a team that finished 3rd at 12-0 and misses a 2-team playoff.

 

True that. One of the tenets of real competition is that no team should be eliminated without losing or tying at least one game, and college football's the only major sport that violates that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If there were Playoffs, people would still bitch about the 4 or 8 teams that get in.

A team that finishes 9th (at 9-3 or something like that) and misses an 8-team playoff has a lot less to bitch about than a team that finished 3rd at 12-0 and misses a 2-team playoff.

Megadittos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×