Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 No, those kids are humble as fuck. It would shock you to see how humble they are when actually talking to them.
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Yeah they sure are humble calling the other team pansies and saying "well nobody can beat us but us".
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Where did you hear this? And if so, how do you know they weren't just playing around. They are taking this very seriously, but they are excited to play in Pasadena.
CanadianChris Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Countdown to thread lockage...T-minus 2 hours and counting...
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Where did you hear this? And if so, how do you know they weren't just playing around. They are taking this very seriously, but they are excited to play in Pasadena. Well the pansies thing was all over gameday this past weekend and they said the "we are the only ones that can beat us" after Oregon and ASU.
CanadianChris Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Where did you hear this? And if so, how do you know they weren't just playing around. They are taking this very seriously, but they are excited to play in Pasadena. Well the pansies thing was all over gameday this past weekend and they said the "we are the only ones that can beat us" after Oregon and ASU. You do know that the "pansies" comment was made toward most hated rival UCLA, right?
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Those games were a LONG time ago. They've matured. Actually Dama, we had this same fucking discussion at the beginning of the season when you said that they would trip up and lose. Why am I wasting my time, when clearly you were wrong then and are now?
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 So you think the Rose Bowl has already been played? That's what you and just about every other USC fan are acting like. You are refusing to give Texas any credit and just saying "Well USC rules and Texas has not shot. No need to discuss the game b/c it's already over." Shit dude I'm admitting USC's good qualities but you(and every other USC fan) refuse to give Texas any credit or admit they are a viable threat to USC. The best you give is "Well they're good but they still have no chance." And yeah I thought USC would lose and they came close. Seems like everyone thought Texas would slip up or thought that VATech was better and that Texas was going to screw them out of the Rose Bowl. Well they were wrong. We can't exactly see the future. We can just predict. I thought USC would lose and they came damn close. And I think they will lose to Texas. I remember this whole board thinking Texas had no business in the Rose Bowl and thinking that Michigan would roll them. And then Texas beats Michigan. Same with the Ohio State game. You just give them no credit and then you get pissed if people don't treat the Trojans like gods. I could say "Well USC looked ok" and the USC fans on this board would crucify me saying "OMG! USC rules! How dare you speak badly of them! They're the greatest them ever! They would beat any college football team by 50!"
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 And if USC wins the Rose Bowl then I would be wrong. Big deal. Life goes on. The only thing that I'd care about is that they won another title and I have to listen to more USC dick sucking for the next 8 months. I actually hope that Notre Dame goes undefeated and gets ranked #1 next season just b/c everyone would forget about USC and I wouldn't have to hear them getting blown at every opportunity.
Guest Leelee Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I love... USCCCCCCC. And I hate UCLA... and Oklahoma. Sorry, playing too much NCAA 2k6, lately.
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 So you think the Rose Bowl has already been played? That's what you and just about every other USC fan are acting like. You are refusing to give Texas any credit and just saying "Well USC rules and Texas has not shot. No need to discuss the game b/c it's already over." Ha, it's hardly over. Discuss it until your face turns blue, but it doesn't make you right. Shit dude I'm admitting USC's good qualities but you(and every other USC fan) refuse to give Texas any credit or admit they are a viable threat to USC. The best you give is "Well they're good but they still have no chance." They are a viable threat if they can stop the run and if Carroll's gameplan doesn't work. Both of those things have to happen, so good luck with that. And yeah I thought USC would lose and they came close. Seems like everyone thought Texas would slip up or thought that VATech was better and that Texas was going to screw them out of the Rose Bowl. Well they were wrong. I said Va Tech would lose to Miami, and look what happened. They did. I also thought that Texas would have a few close calls, but I didn't really think they would lose. We can't exactly see the future. We can just predict. I thought USC would lose and they came damn close. And I think they will lose to Texas. I remember this whole board thinking Texas had no business in the Rose Bowl and thinking that Michigan would roll them. And then Texas beats Michigan. Same with the Ohio State game. You just give them no credit and then you get pissed if people don't treat the Trojans like gods. I thought Texas would roll over Michigan and Ohio State so I was shocked that they didn't do just that. They may not have belonged there, but that's a different issue for a different time.
mike546 Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I still don't get how Dama got access to USCs locker room and practicing. you act as if its a fact that USC is all cocky, and is going to think there gonna kill Texas, when your actually just guessing.
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 They are a viable threat if they can stop the run and if Carroll's gameplan doesn't work. Both of those things have to happen, so good luck with that. And USC is a viable threat to Texas if they can stop Vince Young and deal with the Texas defense and their coordinator's game plan(dude hasn't lost a game in 2 years). Both of those things have to happen, so good luck with that.
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I still don't get how Dama got access to USCs locker room and practicing. you act as if its a fact that USC is all cocky, and is going to think there gonna kill Texas, when your actually just guessing. I have access to a few of their players, and I can tell you right now that what he is saying about USC being cocky is the exact opposite of the truth. At this point, he can just continue to be stupid, because they'll just show how ready they are in the game.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 This thread makes my head hurt.
Urban Warfare Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 (edited) From ESPN.com: Heisman invitations set for Bush, Leinert, Young Edit: They just changed it. Edited December 8, 2005 by hockey_fan
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 And Texas will show that they aren't the bums that can't handle USC that you're making them out to be once the game starts. Once again you act as if USC is going to roll Cal or Oregon or something. They're playing the best team they've played in years not some Pac 10 team. You keep talking about USC gameplanning and preparing.....well Texas is doing the same damn thing! You keep saying that talking to me is impossible well talking to you is impossible because you're basically acting as if all USC has to do is show up and play with some effort and they'll easily take it. Not the case. If they want to win then they'll have to fight to the very last minute. And that's something they've only had to do once against a mediocre defense.
Guest Leelee Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 This thread makes my head hurt. Indeed. And, I'd like to point out that I created a thread to solve this problem, but people just carried on with their silliness.
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 From ESPN.com: Heisman invitations set for Bush, Leinert, Young Edit: They just changed it. I looked to see if they had Leinart spelled with the e, but they had changed it right before I could get a glance.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I'm just staying out of it until the game.
Urban Warfare Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Apparently, the Heisman presentation will only have the three invitees, Leinart, Bush and Young.
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Is this because they think that America believes the others have no chance? In that case they should just announce Bush now and then have a formal presentation for him. It's not exactly like there will be any drama on Saturday.
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I'm just staying out of it until the game. I am now. You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Damaramu. · View this post · Un-ignore Damaramu Also, I think they should have invited Drew Olsen and Brady Quinn to the ceremony, even though I hate both.
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 Oh he's ignoring me and making a show out of it. Big fucking deal. It's not going to change my opinion or view on this subject.
CanadianChris Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I'm quite surprised that Quinn was not invited. The only reason I can think of was that he was way down in the voting, which I didn't expect at all.
Damaramu Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Kingofthe909. · View this post · Un-ignore Kingofthe909 You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Porter. · View this post · Un-ignore Porter Ooooooooooo
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I think people aren't buying into Quinn as much as you think. I think he needs another year to prove himself.
CanadianChris Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Kingofthe909. · View this post · Un-ignore Kingofthe909 You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Porter. · View this post · Un-ignore Porter Ooooooooooo Glad to see you're not making a show out of it.
Guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 I'm quite surprised that Quinn was not invited. The only reason I can think of was that he was way down in the voting, which I didn't expect at all. Did they lessen the number of finalists to 3? Otherwise it wouldn't make sense. Personally, I think that Quinn is a product of the system, but in college football, numbers are numbers and he should be there.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2005 Report Posted December 8, 2005 You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Kingofthe909. · View this post · Un-ignore Kingofthe909 You have chosen to ignore all posts from: Porter. · View this post · Un-ignore Porter Ooooooooooo Glad to see you're not making a show out of it. And he complains about starting fights? That's amusing.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now