Diamonddust 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Eric Bischoff even said he understood why Vince McMahon did it. I think after the whole Madusa incident, Vince wasn't going to fuck around and trust anyone. Vince was in the dark about everything that was going on with Bret and Bischoff. Vince was put in a very bad situation. He was dealing with 2 wrestlers with some of the biggest egos in the wrestling business, and a possible bad situation involving WCW trashing another WWF title on air. Although it was said Bischoff at that point wasn't allowed to do anything of the sort because Turner was afraid of lawsuits, Vince didn't know it. Just to clear up any misunderstanding about this part, Vince knew the WWF title belt couldn't get the garbage bin treatment. He had to make a story up for an unhappy locker room the next day, so he went with the idea that he couldn't risk the WWF title belt being thrown in the trash. It was never going to happen and couldn't happen anyway, which he was fully aware of. Just curious... was that going to stop Bischoff from simply announcing they had signed the reigning WWF Champion at the time, especially if Hart was going to stay until December? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boxer 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Scorecard of the last 10 years: Vince McMahon: Became a heel Attitude Era Went Public Made a lot of money Bought WCW Lost the WWF name Wrestlers dying early Eddie's death Chris Benoit Saga Shawn Michaels: Suffered career ending back injury Retired in 1998 Came back in 2002 Born again in 2002 Won World Heavyweight Title in 2002 Became a full timer wrestler again Now a part time wrestler but still going 10 years later HHH: Slowly took over DX Became a world champion in 1999 Dated Steph in 2000 The world titles piled up from 2002-2005 Married Steph in 2003 Will forever be WWE 4 life Bret Hart: Went to WCW with that nice contract Did absolutely nothing, horrible booking Owen Hart dies Wins WCW title finally Goldberg kicks him in the head ending his career Stroke in 2002 Recovers, writes a book, enters WWE Hall of Fame Brisco: Became a WWE stooge during the Attitude Era Generally known to everyone as a McMahon ass-kisser Earl Hebner: Endured the you screwed Bret chant for years Often involved in similar re-enactment of the Screwjob Lead ref who was a face to most Profile increased after Montreal Generally had employment for life with WWE for Montreal FIRED in 2005 for seling merchandise Is there anyone else who was involved? In my opinion Triple H came out of Montreal looking the best albeit WAY WAY down the road. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diamonddust 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Scorecard of the last 10 years: Vince McMahon: Became a heel Attitude Era Went Public Made a lot of money Bought WCW Lost the WWF name Wrestlers dying early Eddie's death Chris Benoit Saga Shawn Michaels: Suffered career ending back injury Retired in 1998 Came back in 2002 Born again in 2002 Won World Heavyweight Title in 2002 Became a full timer wrestler again Now a part time wrestler but still going 10 years later HHH: Slowly took over DX Became a world champion in 1999 Dated Steph in 2000 The world titles piled up from 2002-2005 Married Steph in 2003 Will forever be WWE 4 life Bret Hart: Went to WCW with that nice contract Did absolutely nothing, horrible booking Owen Hart dies Wins WCW title finally Goldberg kicks him in the head ending his career Stroke in 2002 Recovers, writes a book, enters WWE Hall of Fame Brisco: Became a WWE stooge during the Attitude Era Generally known to everyone as a McMahon ass-kisser Earl Hebner: Endured the you screwed Bret chant for years Often involved in similar re-enactment of the Screwjob Lead ref who was a face to most Profile increased after Montreal Generally had employment for life with WWE for Montreal FIRED in 2005 for seling merchandise Is there anyone else who was involved? In my opinion Triple H came out of Montreal looking the best albeit WAY WAY down the road. Those are the only ones we know were involved. There has always been rumors that people were involved on both sides (Setting up the screwjob and warning Bret), but their identity hasn't been revealed. I believe Meltzer has always said a key player has never been named, and he won't be named until he dies, which makes me believe he's kind of up there in age. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boxer 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Scorecard of the last 10 years: Vince McMahon: Became a heel Attitude Era Went Public Made a lot of money Bought WCW Lost the WWF name Wrestlers dying early Eddie's death Chris Benoit Saga Shawn Michaels: Suffered career ending back injury Retired in 1998 Came back in 2002 Born again in 2002 Won World Heavyweight Title in 2002 Became a full timer wrestler again Now a part time wrestler but still going 10 years later HHH: Slowly took over DX Became a world champion in 1999 Dated Steph in 2000 The world titles piled up from 2002-2005 Married Steph in 2003 Will forever be WWE 4 life Bret Hart: Went to WCW with that nice contract Did absolutely nothing, horrible booking Owen Hart dies Wins WCW title finally Goldberg kicks him in the head ending his career Stroke in 2002 Recovers, writes a book, enters WWE Hall of Fame Brisco: Became a WWE stooge during the Attitude Era Generally known to everyone as a McMahon ass-kisser Earl Hebner: Endured the you screwed Bret chant for years Often involved in similar re-enactment of the Screwjob Lead ref who was a face to most Profile increased after Montreal Generally had employment for life with WWE for Montreal FIRED in 2005 for seling merchandise Is there anyone else who was involved? In my opinion Triple H came out of Montreal looking the best albeit WAY WAY down the road. Those are the only ones we know were involved. There has always been rumors that people were involved on both sides (Setting up the screwjob and warning Bret), but their identity hasn't been revealed. I believe Meltzer has always said a key player has never been named, and he won't be named until he dies, which makes me believe he's kind of up there in age. All of the guys in the locker room at the time, I have this feeling that Undertaker must have known SOMETHING then. Just because of the stature he had with the company, he must have either known or seen something coming. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diamonddust 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 All of the guys in the locker room at the time, I have this feeling that Undertaker must have known SOMETHING then. Just because of the stature he had with the company, he must have either known or seen something coming. It's been said before, but there were people telling Bret to watch himself in the ring. Vader, in particular due to his work in Japan, was the one who told him to kick out at a one count and don't let himself get caught in any submission moves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pochorenella 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 It seems it's up to me to somewhat act the part of Shawn's attorney on this case. I might sound like a Michaels apologist but whatever. I don't believe HBK wouldnt Job to ANYONE.... Look at HBK's track record. He even refused to job to Austin at WM14, before Taker stepped in days before the show and threatened to beats the lights out of him. Having read Shawn's book, he states that this is completely false, including the "Taker taping his fists" thing. Wether people choose to believe Meltzer or whomever stated this as fact or Michaels is up to them. I heard there was an interview where Taker said he did warn Shawn but I don't know. Guess we'll have to wait for Taker's autobiography or something to clear this up once and for all. This thing could turn out to be one of those rumours that people believe to be fact because it's been told so many times, like Bret winning the WWF Title at Final 4 was an on-the-fly decision. I don't believe HBK wouldnt Job to ANYONE.... Go look up the match results yourself. Between his WWF title loss to Sid at Survivor Series 96 and his semi-retirement match with Austin at Wrestlemania 14, Shawn DIDN'T job to anyone. For seventeen months he didn't get pinned one single time, no matter whether he was babyface or heel, champ or not. (And no, HHH's Euro title "win" doesn't count.) Meanwhile, Bret was jobbing to guys like The Patriot. He jobbed a few times on house shows. I know there was at least one time in late '96/early '97 when he got pinned by Austin, then Hart pinned him in a dark match at the MSG Raw that year (it was a 3-way with Taker), then I believe Taker pinned him in a six-man at MSG about a week after the screwjob. And, um, that's all I can think of. But none of those were on TV, so your point stands. Between his match with Sid at the 1997 Rumble and the RAW taping where he won the Tag Titles with Austin and then defended against LOD was a four month or so gap where he didn't wrestle, which was the time when he "lost his smile" or whatever people like to call it here. Then came King of The Ring vs Austin and maybe something else, his backstage problem with Bret where he left again, until September for Ground Zero vs Taker. That's another gap. My point is just saying that you shouldn't call it a seventeen month gap because it's non-continuous, if that makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Scorecard of the last 10 years: Vince McMahon: Became a heel Attitude Era Went Public Made a lot of money Bought WCW Lost the WWF name Wrestlers dying early Eddie's death Chris Benoit Saga Shawn Michaels: Suffered career ending back injury Retired in 1998 Came back in 2002 Born again in 2002 Won World Heavyweight Title in 2002 Became a full timer wrestler again Now a part time wrestler but still going 10 years later HHH: Slowly took over DX Became a world champion in 1999 Dated Steph in 2000 The world titles piled up from 2002-2005 Married Steph in 2003 Will forever be WWE 4 life Bret Hart: Went to WCW with that nice contract Did absolutely nothing, horrible booking Owen Hart dies Wins WCW title finally Goldberg kicks him in the head ending his career Stroke in 2002 Recovers, writes a book, enters WWE Hall of Fame Brisco: Became a WWE stooge during the Attitude Era Generally known to everyone as a McMahon ass-kisser Earl Hebner: Endured the you screwed Bret chant for years Often involved in similar re-enactment of the Screwjob Lead ref who was a face to most Profile increased after Montreal Generally had employment for life with WWE for Montreal FIRED in 2005 for seling merchandise Is there anyone else who was involved? In my opinion Triple H came out of Montreal looking the best albeit WAY WAY down the road. Those are the only ones we know were involved. There has always been rumors that people were involved on both sides (Setting up the screwjob and warning Bret), but their identity hasn't been revealed. I believe Meltzer has always said a key player has never been named, and he won't be named until he dies, which makes me believe he's kind of up there in age. All of the guys in the locker room at the time, I have this feeling that Undertaker must have known SOMETHING then. Just because of the stature he had with the company, he must have either known or seen something coming. Undertaker was pissed off at Vince for the whole thing, and even forced Vince to go talk to Bret - and we all know how that ended. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest the_last_rites Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Having read Shawn's book, he states that this is completely false, including the "Taker taping his fists" thing. Wether people choose to believe Meltzer or whomever stated this as fact or Michaels is up to them. I heard there was an interview where Taker said he did warn Shawn but I don't know. Guess we'll have to wait for Taker's autobiography or something to clear this up once and for all. This thing could turn out to be one of those rumours that people believe to be fact because it's been told so many times, like Bret winning the WWF Title at Final 4 was an on-the-fly decision. Yes there is . He doesnt hand pick that incident but he does mention that he has had to discipline HBK. In that interview he also goes ahead to say that Big Show was someone who had incredible talent but lets it all go to waste because of his holier than thou attitude. I could be wrong but I think it was OTR with Landsberg. I'd rather believe someone like Taker here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cabbageboy 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Holier than thou attitude? Wonder what that means? Here is what I don't get about the screwjob. Why didn't Bret listen to any of these guys like Vader or UT to be on the lookout? I actually agree with HHH's comments saying "We wouldn't have been that stupid." The goofiest thing you can do if you're worried about being screwed is to be put in a submission hold where the ref can call for the bell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diamonddust 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Holier than thou attitude? Wonder what that means? Here is what I don't get about the screwjob. Why didn't Bret listen to any of these guys like Vader or UT to be on the lookout? I actually agree with HHH's comments saying "We wouldn't have been that stupid." The goofiest thing you can do if you're worried about being screwed is to be put in a submission hold where the ref can call for the bell. Because he trusted Hebner wasn't going to do something like that to him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 My favorite part of HBK's book was when he said he saw Vince fly to the ground and he got out of there. Once out, they went back to the hotel room, and HHH got punched in the face. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Having read Shawn's book, he states that this is completely false, including the "Taker taping his fists" thing. Wether people choose to believe Meltzer or whomever stated this as fact or Michaels is up to them. I heard there was an interview where Taker said he did warn Shawn but I don't know. Guess we'll have to wait for Taker's autobiography or something to clear this up once and for all. This thing could turn out to be one of those rumours that people believe to be fact because it's been told so many times, like Bret winning the WWF Title at Final 4 was an on-the-fly decision. Yes there is . He doesnt hand pick that incident but he does mention that he has had to discipline HBK. In that interview he also goes ahead to say that Big Show was someone who had incredible talent but lets it all go to waste because of his holier than thou attitude. I could be wrong but I think it was OTR with Landsberg. I'd rather believe someone like Taker here It was OTR with Landsberg. Landsberg mentioned the incident with Undertaker warning Shawn over doing the job for Austin, and while Undertaker didn't outright say it was true, what he said made it very clear that it was. And it's probably not a good idea to take Shawn's book at face value, because, among other things, he also claimed to have come up with the sharpshooter spot in the Montreal match, which wasn't true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Floridian Cool Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Here's the bottom line about Montreal: Vince is the boss. If he really wanted Bret to do the job to HBK, he should have put his foot down...not lied to Bret's face and agreed to a DQ ending (as was caught on tape in Wrestling With Shadows). That's just a bitch move. I could be very wrong but I don't think that Vince ever outright told or even asked Bret to do the job at Survivor Series...he just beat around the bush in their meetings ("What do YOU want to do?"), said okay to the DQ finish...then screwed him. I don't remember exactly how the recorded convo from Wrestling With Shadows went, but wasn't it like: Vince: So how do you see this thing ending? Bret: I see it being a big schmozz, blah, blah, blah. And then I could relinquish the title the next night on RAW. Vince: Okay, that sounds good to me. I did always wonder why Bret didn't suspect that something was up when Vince and like every agent in the company came out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 I could be very wrong but I don't think that Vince ever outright told, or even asked Bret to do the job at Survivor Series... At least twice, Vince proposed an idea that involved Bret putting over Shawn at Survivor Series. Though the second one doesn't really count, because it was designed to get Bret to leave. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Bret Hart had a creative control clause in his contract and he wouldn't do the job to Shawn in Canada. It's that simple. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Floridian Cool Report post Posted November 9, 2007 And how is changing the finish behind his back honoring that clause? He should have said, "If you're not going to do the job then you're off TV and you don't get to say goodbye to your fans...hand over my belt and good luck in WCW"...end of story. And I still don't see how Vince couldn't "afford" Bret's contract...wasn't it only a million per year? I bet they spent that much on that ugly RAW is WAR set. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 And how is changing the finish behind his back honoring that clause? He should have said, "If you're not going to do the job then you're off TV and you don't get to say goodbye to your fans...hand over my belt and good luck in WCW"...end of story. If Vince did that, Bret would just sue his ass for breach of contract. Bret was only going to do what he wanted in those last 30 days. That's why the clause was in the contract, to specifically prevent scenarios like the one you just mentioned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Floridian Cool Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Okay...then couldn't Bret have sued him for breach of contract anyway? I fail to see your point/how the screwjob is NOT in violation of that clause. He changed the f'n finish! Either way, he just shot down Bret's creative control. The only difference is that the first scenario is classier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Floridian Cool Report post Posted November 9, 2007 x Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Okay...then couldn't Bret have sued him for breach of contract anyway? Then Vince would counter-sue over Bret punching him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 As HTQ pointed out, Bret didnt' do himself any favors by attacking Vince after the show. At that point, it was probably in everyone's best interest to drop the whole thing. But if Vince said in advance that Bret had to job or else, Bret would have had him by the balls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Floridian Cool Report post Posted November 9, 2007 So Vince's plan from the very beginning was to get punched so that Bret couldn't sue him? Wow, I had no idea that McMahon was the fucking Emperor from Star Wars. Bret would have had Vince by the balls if he hadn't hit him. Sneaky screwjob or direct defiance of Bret's wishes, it is all in violation of the clause. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StrapFinlay 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 But how far does "reasonable" creative control go? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 He can't actually prove that the finish that they did wasn't the one agreed upon on. Yes even the Wrestling with Shadows video could be picked apart by good lawyers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StrapFinlay 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 He can't actually prove that the finish that they did wasn't the one agreed upon on. Yes even the Wrestling with Shadows video could be picked apart by good lawyers. Perhaps it was the decision that was agreed upon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Floridian Cool Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Who allowed Bret to have that clause written into his contract in the first place? Vince. Basically, it all boils down to Vince being passive-aggressive in his business dealings. At least Bret wasn't hiding anything. Obviously, Vince had no qualms about trampling over Bret's creative control. He violated the clause in the contract, he just went about it in the most underhanded way possible. If he was scared of legal action, he wouldn't have screwed him. If he wanted to get punched out just to cover his bases, why did he have to be dragged out of his office by Undertaker? He just didn't have the balls to say no to Bret's face. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 He can't actually prove that the finish that they did wasn't the one agreed upon on. Yes even the Wrestling with Shadows video could be picked apart by good lawyers. Did you miss the taped conversation where Vince agrees to the run-in finish? Or where everyone involved in the originally intended finish were in the gorilla position waiting to run-in, and wondering what the hell was going on when the screwjob went down? It can be proved that the finish that went down wasn't the one agreed upon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 Well I think I misphrased. Yes it can be proved, but I think judges are very leery on ruling on pro wrestling cases where the world is so insular that it's hard to prove whether a case is legitimate or "worked". But I guess if a judge was willing to take everything as it is, it can be easily proved. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StrapFinlay 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 He can't actually prove that the finish that they did wasn't the one agreed upon on. Yes even the Wrestling with Shadows video could be picked apart by good lawyers. Did you miss the taped conversation where Vince agrees to the run-in finish? Or where everyone involved in the originally intended finish were in the gorilla position waiting to run-in, and wondering what the hell was going on when the screwjob went down? It can be proved that the finish that went down wasn't the one agreed upon. But to be ultra fussy, what can actually be proven beyond reasonable doubt? Or even on the balance of probabilities? Yes, that section of the tape shows a finish being agreed. But who is to say more conversations were not held at a later point? Yes, the wrestlers were in the Gorilla position waiting for the run-in - but that only goes to show they were told that was going to be the finish. It doesn't prove that was the finish agreed by Bret and Vince. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2007 In the ten years since Montreal, I don't recall Vince ever using as his defense that idea that Bret is lying, and the finish that went down is the one they agreed to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites