At Home

I'm calling panthermatt a troll, not Marvin.

Dude, then you have to dress up!

Biased party hack.

I'm a misogynist, I sure as hell ain't going to care. Ghost, call it a day, man. Marvin has debated things like that.

I don't think anyone is denying the fact that the board is mostly liberal and liberal hob-nobbing is going to take place, but Matt rarely puts anything worth talking forward in his responses. It's always just trolling everyone else's posts, hiding behind the curtain of being an "independent." Of course, he's rarely ever defended any of his positions, or hell, even put them forward; most of his posts are concentrated around blowing whistles at us and shouting LIBERAL BIAS from the soap box. Now, name-calling doesn't do anyone any good. Agent's right, calling Marvin a retard without making a point is denigrating the thread. But, as numerous examples from this and many other threads will show, Marvin makes a lot of stupid points. It's like the rule of the facepalm, where something is so inane that it defies logical breakdown and explanation. Are we not allowed to call Marvin on his shit?

It sure does suck having opposing viewpoints... ON A MESSAGE BOARD. If you can't handle opposing viewpoints, maybe you shouldn't be discussing politics in the first place. Are you aware of Marvin's past posts? Liberal Bias and whatnot has little to do with the fact that he sucks. I'm not defending Marvin's content, just his right to put forth content without being called a fucking idiot, as in previous posts. And liberal bias does have at least a little to do with it. If Marvin was putting forth ideas that you agreed with in a retarded way, you probably wouldn't insult his intelligence. That's my hunch, anyway.

Is anyone disagreeing with me now when I called Matt a troll?

That's not the issue, Marvin. Quit BEING A FUCKING DUMBASS

Well yeah that good ole paranoia has been keeping me thinking on that route

Oh come on, you're certainly comparing apples and oranges if you're trying to expand this into policy decisions. That's a shitty case to make.

Tell us Marvin, how is this going to affect Obama? Is he going to suddenly radicalize the White House?

She's not awesome, she's a bitch. A shit bitch.

All this guilt by association shit is really stupid. I don't quite understand how it's supposed to affect anyone's ability to lead, or how anyone is surprised that someone working on the street level in a city like Chicago would, gasp, interact with radicals.

Towel heads

He only partially got away with murder; he lost the civil suit.

RCP has Obama ahead in electoral votes by 168, and ahead in all but 2 of the battle ground states.

The guy or girl's hand on the left: "C'mon, pussy."

Great.

Having an impact on music and having a lot of fans are two different things

No one argues with women more than I do. I've been right on 95% of the issues, but you can't debate against a brick wall. I'm saying that even if you clearly win an argument, you've lost something. Not your dignity or anything like that, but that bitch just won't want to talk to you again (unless it's like a girlfriend) because she knows she's been bested. So, for better or for worse, there's going to be changes a-stump. Also, what's this shit with making girls believe they're wrong? Once a bitch has an idea, it's stuck in there forever.

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=5928293 Oh, The View. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UaRXvRwhOk Only the Jonah Hill parts are funny.

ABC's Life On Mars = worst show ever

The (male) co-worker then proceeded to tell me if you ever argue with a woman, then no matter who's wrong, the man is wrong. That's mostly true. Arguments with women are usually a losing battle, no matter how good your case is or how much you win. It's tragic, really.

Called it. Also, I hope someone will agree with me on this one, but did anyone find the highest point of the debate to be when Biden discussed the genocide in Darfur? He really showed that it was an issue that he truly cares about and wants to do something about.