snuffbox

NBA: The shortbus of American sport.

Wabbit season you stupid fucker. In all honesty, we should be allowed to hunt whatever we please after winning an award of this magnitude.

I'm no retard...I'm one of Time Magazine's People of the Year, goddamit!

I don't see how this is such a riddle. Read Time's own article. It's not long.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/...1569514,00.html Time Magazine agrees that it is "you" or "everyone"...but what do they know that Bloomberg dont know? M I rite?

http://www.cnn.com/ Look at the cover of the magazine.

I take it the NFL is under the impression that La Crosse-Eau Claire isn't Packer territory. Strong work, guys! At least you should be able to pick up 620. There could be a rash of TheMikeSC-appoved activities next Thursday night.

The cover says "You" Try again, bud.

This should be a time of great pride & community spirit, Czech. Yo everyone, we did it!

I'm going to like this 'new tradition' even less next Thursday night.

I'm not a fan of this whole games only on NFL Network thing.

Scheduled for tonight: Replays of the really good fights Foreman-Holyfield & Lewis-Briggs...shown instead, the ultrarare Sportscenter.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/12/16/D8M240Q00.html Edwards will apparently announce his '08 candidacy from NOLA. Drudgreport indicates that Newt wont be running. It's been a pretty eventful 24 hours for the 2008 campaign. Thompson filed exploratory papers, this Edwards leak, and two would-be losers apparently have bowed out already.

Unreal.

Ugh, like talking to a child. Dukakis looked Presidential. The Republicans used that moronic photo op against him. Something the Democrats should have used against Bush in '04, when he dressed up like a GI Joe to declare 'mission accomplished' on that boat the year before, but Team Kerry lacked anything resembling balls. Also, Dukakis, though looking respectable and bright, was a dismal candidate led by a horific manager in Manbeast Estrich. Bentsen/Jackson should have been the ticket that year. I didn't say that you believe that tall/slender/white matters but you DID say, just a few posts up (unless you Jerked that post as well), that you think it could/will apply to the American voters. I said "no" it wont and gave several examples/reasons for that.

That should start after both classics are done. Shouldn't miss either of the HBO fights unless the West Coast schedules are really different.

A few of us knew Wisco was this good. Tucker is one of the 5 best players in the country and, now, they finally have a solid big-guy presence in Brian Butch. Very well coached, plenty of talent, well rounded, tough. And good luck beating them at the Kohl Center no matter who you are.

ESPN will be showing the classic Foreman-Holyfield fight tonight, followed by the surprisingly good brawl Lewis-Briggs.

Harry Daugherty was EXTREMELY overrated in his relation to Harding's success. Daugherty wanted desperately to be the Mark Hanna for his generation, but wasnt even in the same league. Then, once Harding was elected President, with far less help than his buddy Harry told everyone that would listen, he made the biggest mistake of his career in naming Daugherty his Attorney General. The result - Teapot Dome and a reputation as a bad president. That said, Harding absolutely 'looked the part', especially for his time period. He wanted to follow in his homeboy McKinley's footsteps (like Daugherty with Hanna) and succeded at that, helped more than a little by sharing that royal Victorian look. Neither Harding nor McKinley were 'slender' either.

So that's what that thing is down there. An e-fed.

Jerk, youre the only person I've ever heard of to think a Presidential candidate needs to be 'tall, slender, white'. We're beyond the 'white' thing by now (in the civilized regions of the country) and few Presidents of the last century have been tall/slender...Bush Sr was but wasnt even considered tall, Clinton was chubby, Carter didnt really fit that bill, nor Nixon, nor Bush Jr, or LBJ, or FDR. Tall/slender/white - Ike, JFK, Reagen, was Ford?, was Truman? It really doesn't matter. The Dems went with guys they felt looked the part the most before (Kerry, Gore, Dukakis, Adlai) and failed. If its a trait that comes with a solid candidate, it can be a plus, but it is far from a driving point.

Bush Jr - Looks like a retarded monkey that thinks he's in a John Wayne movie Clinton - Drunken country bumpkin Bush Sr - 100 lb stock broker Reagan - Looked like a President Carter - Goofy farmer Ford - Clumsy oaf Nixon - Creepy uncle Lyndon Johnson - Dumbo JFK - Looked like a President Ike - Grandpa To answer your question, no. Also, Tommy Thompson filed his exploratory committee papers yesterday.

No shit?

I dont think the GB-Chi game in Chicago will be as brutal as game one at Lambeau, but I definitly won't be picking the Pack to win.

I like him. He has some real libertarian attributes.