snuffbox

Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other. If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee. -=Mike Did you watch Meet the Press tonight Mike?

Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other.

I really dont 'get' all the hate for third parties...it usually always comes from people with strong ties to one of the two main parties, and it really seems very un-democratic.

Saying shes a man is one thing. Describing double-fellatio with Sean Waltman and Chyna is just unacceptable. Sick and wrong...I suggest counseling.

nice. Jeff Buckley - Lover You Shouldve Come Over

None yet, but i wouldn't be too surprised if there was one. All that's been announced is the home town Manchester gig in May. Which is awesome if i get a ticket, but helluva lame if i don't. Hopefully he will.. I see hes played Madison, Wisc before...If he came here again that would be titties. I could see Moz, Neil Young, and Bonnaroo all in the first half of '04!

Did you father kill himself when you were young? If not, then you have no clue either. Lockwood was a coward who killed himself and basically said "Screw you" to his little daughter. -=Mike Im happy for you duder. I hope you can continue with the righteous life.

Good Lord

No.

the fuck?

I vote for Taka. Good diary, keep it coming.

The Vines - Outtathaway

I will definitly be purchasing this cd. Any word at all on if there will be a North American tour to support this? I havent seen the great Moz live yet.

I have NOTHING against the wealthy. Nothing. For the most part they seem to be fine, respectable people. There are obviously some exceptions to that rule(Kenny Boy Lay) just as there are bad apples in the poor sect(Ed Gein). This is not a 'personal' thing. It is just really obvious that the rich can afford taxation and the poor can not. This is reality though, not political rhetoric. Personally, as a libertarian, I am all for tax cuts across the board. Check http://www.lp.org for further reading.

Neil - Words(Between the Lines of Age)

Color me un-shocked.

First off, don't speak about the plight of the working class family as if none of us have ever experienced that lifestyle or anything. I seriously doubt that many people on this board were born with silver spoons in their mouths and have been able to go their entire lives without ever feeling a financial pinch. Anyway, what is your solution to this problem? You want to stop taking ANY taxes out of people's paychecks? How do you fund Social Security, then? Medicare? Drop funding for those programs and you'd REALLY be fucking the poor/older people. What about those precious unemployment taxes? You want to stop those? What will happen when someone is laid off and then has nothing to fall back on because there is no unemployment money to be had? Do you propose some asinine plan of taking taxes only from those that you deem to be "wealthy" and thus able to afford it? What is your alternative? Why should the people most likely to take advantage of the services those payroll taxes pay for NOT actually pay anything into the fund? Where's the fairness in that? As for income taxes, the amount someone has taken out of each of their "precious" paychecks is easily controlled. Changing the number of exemptions on a W-4 form will take care of that, so that they can take home more money each month, while still paying their fair share of income taxes. Also, it's been my own personal experience that most families in "dire" financial straits have their financial priorities out of whack. Cutting out cable TV or not buying so many stupid DVD's or not paying $110 for some goddamn LeBron James tennis shoes their kids endlessly begged to have, as just a few simple examples, can go a long way to paying for a "trip to the grocery store." Wow...yep, you really understand the situation duder. More like your just being an arrogent ass who can't refute the argument so you'll just leave a pithy quote and a smiley at the end so you can try and think that you've somehow salvaged a victory here. "pithy" -Bill O' Reilly Seriously, Im not going to waste time arguing this, The realitis of working class life is what I, and others here, have allready discussed. The arguement is RNC rhetoric. I agree with the lives and situations that are right in front of my eyes. I will not stand behind a parties political rhetoric in the face of its glaring inconstistencies and total disregard for the actual situan in America.

First off, don't speak about the plight of the working class family as if none of us have ever experienced that lifestyle or anything. I seriously doubt that many people on this board were born with silver spoons in their mouths and have been able to go their entire lives without ever feeling a financial pinch. Anyway, what is your solution to this problem? You want to stop taking ANY taxes out of people's paychecks? How do you fund Social Security, then? Medicare? Drop funding for those programs and you'd REALLY be fucking the poor/older people. What about those precious unemployment taxes? You want to stop those? What will happen when someone is laid off and then has nothing to fall back on because there is no unemployment money to be had? Do you propose some asinine plan of taking taxes only from those that you deem to be "wealthy" and thus able to afford it? What is your alternative? Why should the people most likely to take advantage of the services those payroll taxes pay for NOT actually pay anything into the fund? Where's the fairness in that? As for income taxes, the amount someone has taken out of each of their "precious" paychecks is easily controlled. Changing the number of exemptions on a W-4 form will take care of that, so that they can take home more money each month, while still paying their fair share of income taxes. Also, it's been my own personal experience that most families in "dire" financial straits have their financial priorities out of whack. Cutting out cable TV or not buying so many stupid DVD's or not paying $110 for some goddamn LeBron James tennis shoes their kids endlessly begged to have, as just a few simple examples, can go a long way to paying for a "trip to the grocery store." Wow...yep, you really understand the situation duder.

Drury is using the Special Ed gimmick Special Ed = Downs Syndrome Downs Syndrome = Retarded Drury = Retarded Thanks.

I like this idea = it wont be happening.

Neil Young - Heart of Gold

And the wealthy pay MORE taxes. INCLUDING income taxes. They pay their share. Heck, they pay more than their share. -=Mike So do lower income folks. Most of their paycheck gets gouged by payroll taxes. And they get it back. And let's not even get into the unfairness in the gov't getting an annual, interest-free loan from people it overtaxes. -=Mike Working class people need that money right then, at paycheck time. These are people who depend on their long hours and labor to get them and their families through until the next check. The ammount taken out of a paycheck could pay for a trip to the grocery store...do you understand how important that can be for a working class family. The tax return once a year doesnt help them much during crunch time, all year round.

Neil Young - Harvest Phil Collins - Hits

Chave likes it...he said so, but it might have been a bit mumbled as his mouth was busy servicing Drurys nutsack.

In retort I offer you the main events of Vengeance 2002 (Rock, Taker, and Angle) and 2003 (Angle, Brock, and Big Show). I'll throw in Survivor Series 99 with Show, Rock, and Hunter. ...so they're pretty hit and miss. I'd just rather see 1 on 1 matches Tajiri/Super Crazy/Nunzio came up with a few good matches in ECW... But there have been so many shitty three way dances....and WMXX should be one on one, but how can you fit all the Cliquesters in it that way?