MrRant

Perhaps a jaunt down to Argentina with a celebrity deaths book would be in order. It will be just like a treasure hunt. I found John Candy~!

Click for penis.

Yay... another round of which PBP is this can start.

One of the other hiccups is that to play an EA Game... EA wants MS's cust info on you.

It most certainly is my fight. I wouldn't ever let you take away the word marriage from the people that want it which is what you are attempting to do if you can't get it by forcing them to go to a church. Same thing I've told my sister (who is a lesbian). And you are deluded to think that this is even close to being on par with anything the Irish, blacks, etc had to go through. This isn't about rights as you would have all the same. If you didn't have the same rights then you would have a leg to stand on... but you don't.

That's AoO code for suck his dick and he may do it.

They don't beat as many hippies any more. Just white trash, latinos and blacks with the occasional Jew mixed in for spice.

No the point was if it's okay for me to be inconvienced by having to go to a church to have the word marriage on a certificate... why can't gays suffer the inconvience of accepting a word that means the exact same thing as marriage? My main concern personally is the benefits. Not the word marriage. I am a better person than the people fighting this arguement (both gays and straights) because I realize what petty bitches you are to get in a huff about a word that has at least 20 synonyms. I at least know that words don't mean equality. It is how you are treated.

If they make a reality hippie beating show then I will.

Well... you did steal all that gold from the Egyptians.

Don't you work for an insurance company?

My point is that... I wouldn't care whether homosexuals could or not. As long as I (and other non-religious people), don't have to go into a church... I'm happy. I'm not going to give that up just so that you can feel a false sense of equality because you can't have the same word as straight people. Why should I give up something and inconvience myself for you to feel better? Does that suck? Yeah. I personally would just call it marriages across the board but in reality it's all the same if it is a marriage for straights and a union for gays. Just quit while you are ahead (metaphor). Man that may not make sense, but it's 3:45am.

No. The point is I'm not willing to inconvience myself (or any other non religious person) by going to a church if we wanted the word marriage on a certificate if they decided to make everything civil unions like you say. If I have the choice of : a. Straight (non religious) people being able to get the word marriage on their certificate without having to go to a church like they are now with gay's having civil unions. or b. Gay and Straight people having civil unions and non religious people having to go to a church to get marriage on their certificate. I would choose A everytime.

This just doesn't sound good.

Even more embarrasing then that, is you STILL haven't changed your act.

No it doesn't make any sense. I'm not religous so you are saying if I want to have marriage on my certificate instead of civil union, I should have to go to a church to do so? I'd rather go to the courthouse. Going by that logic... I'd rather keep them seperate then, since it would inconvience me by going against my belief that the word marriage isn't religious in nature. It's just a word but I want that word and I'm not willing to go to a church to get it so I guess you gays (and my sister) will just have to suffer. My it IS fun being a selfish ass!

So basically you are saying if you can't have the word marriage than nobody should get it eh? Who is selfish again?

This is a similar "struggle for equality" compared to other equality issues? That is a pretty strong comparision for a relatively minor thing.

You are a fucking moron.

Who is going to look down on you? The same people that already do. Why be concerned with what they think? The ones that don't look down on you now wouldn't all of a sudden start. Being "married" isn't going to make certain people like you. Besides the definition of marriage is union so it's the exact same thing.

No, the most important thing is to be EQUALS. Not "well, kind of the same, but with a different name". EQ-UAL-S. Again, if it was up to you, back during the days of the racism debates you'd be telling people that the "seperate but equal" policies of integration are A-OK and they have "misplaced priorities" for wanting FULL equality. -Xias But you are equal. There would be no benefit or tax form that you would be able to get . Face it. You are more concerned with one word than actually getting the benefits etc that most homosexuals claim they want. I would be more interested in making sure my partner was covered on my health insurance that whether I had a marriage or a civil union.

That is the exact attitude that will end up causing more problems than anything else. You are just lowering yourself to their level... why don't you try and be above them. The most important thing should be having all the rights and benefits of "marriage" to share with your partner. Not the word. You have misplaced priorities.

I like living in sin though. Depends on what testimonials you are looking for I would imagine. I'm just assuming what SP was trying to say. Never said I agreed with it.

Well we wouldn't be sinners if it wasn't for that bitch Eve.... And regarding SP's comment JOTW, I don't think he is talking about a re-education program of hate but of people finding Christ and him showing them the way and that way doesn't included being homosexual. Good for them if it makes them happy.