The Amazing Rando

Kane will attack Kofi and take his place, sadly

WHAT JUST HAPPENED?!!

The gimmick of this match should be "Foregone Conclusion"

Yes, they knew of your condition, but they fired Kanyon for the same thing and he sued THEN too.

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!! I hadn't seen it posted anywhere, except someone saying that there would be Qualifiers tonight. I was just pointing out he was defending in it after someone had said that having the champ defend is stupid for the type of match (even though that was how it was originally designed in storyline by Uncle Eric)

WWE is saying Cena is defending at No Way Out in the Chamber.

"You're a big nasty bastard, and your mama said so!!!"

I predict Conchairto

I hope the current group of folks on the island get to see their own plane crash in one of the time blips.

Also, the doctor went from referring to himself as Dr. Marvin Candle to being called Dr. Chang (or Cheng) by the Dharma employee

I like how Jericho was fired, yet he gets to stand in the ring and sulk instead of being escorted away by security

SAVE_MY.JOB

Who are you to doubt The Dudley!?

I think it was that he was consistently getting the jobber spot against guys with absolutely zero potential.

Matter of factly, I just said it cause I thought it was funny. I also believe it started during the days of TSM not allowing OAO show threads.

No, he said that asking HHH for financial help would change their friendship, and he did not want that to happen. Michaels did not go to JBL, JBL made him an offer that would help him support his family, long-term. That's what I get for DVR FF'ing.

I hated how they explained HBK not asking HHH. He says "I don't need anyone's help" yet the reason he went to JBL in the first place is because he needed help.

I love Kane, but I don't think I could handle over seven hours of him.

Yes, because when I think of a legacy, I think of MANU! Although he is about the size of a Subaru

I hate Sandra Lee. Semi-homemade my fucking ass. I was on their website just looking around for some new recipes (something to do to with leftover turkey, actually) and one of the recipes from her was basically "Cook prepackaged biscuits, cut them open, put turkey and mayonnaise inside, ta da! turkey sammich!!" I don't wanna see that crap on there. I love baking, love it love it love it. In the past month I've made 5 cakes. Sure two of them weren't for me but a badass strawberry, chocolate chip banana, and triple chocolate cherry cake were enough to tide my stomach over between my wife's wonderful cooking. Also, Good Eats rules. I wish I could watch it more but I usually fall asleep and don't feel the need to DVR it since I've seen most of the episodes more than once as it is.

Probably because her character was always kind of a club girl

That sell was like if Shane Douglas was Dvon Dudley

Regal's bizarre facial expressions are amazing. He has a look like "I don't even know why I'm here but I'm going to kill you and skin you anyway"

He once did a promo from it. He got in backstage and cut a promo while it drove him to the ring. Then he got out and made his entrance.

It doesn't matter that it's an alternate timeline. That has nothing to do with anything. Technically, every fictional movie ever is in an alternate universe since it's depicting stuff that never really happened. My point is, the ending of the book Watchmen involved a violent attack on New York City, for the purpose of causing panic and terror, which left many many innocent people dead. That's a plot point with a hell of a lot more loaded symbolic meaning now than it was when it was first written in the 80s. Especially since the story takes the point of view that the mass death of innocent people was a necessary if not heroic act. You don't see how some people might get upset about that kind of thing? I mean, there have been plenty of movies out there which caused plenty of controversy over much less sensitive material. Remember people whining over any religious movie ever released just because it didn't exactly match their views on said religion? Or any popular movie featuring gay people, because the right wing don't take kindly to their type? Meanwhile, here we have a story which could theoretically be interpreted as saying that a 9/11-ish attack could be a good thing, and it wouldn't be that much of a stretch since that kinda is what it's implying. You don't see how that might ruffle some people's feathers? ...but, see, that is THE STORY. The entire reason fans have been clamoring to see a live action film about Watchmen is the fact that it's a damn good story, it's unique, and has a very memorable ending. It has nothing to do with any terrorist attack that has happened or ever will happen on any city in the world. I mean, fuck, are they never ever going to show the film Independence Day ever again because New York got fucked up? Why even MAKE this film if they are going to change the ending? When I was first told to go out and find the book and read it the ending was something that was incredibly hyped to me going in. "You just have to go read it, it's awesome!" and indeed, it was a great ending. The story doesn't make sense otherwise and, unlike Batman, Superman, Spiderman, Fantastic Four, or anything else, there is NO LEEWAY with this story. You can't just change the entire ending. All the other comic book movies have a forty or so year continuity that, depending on the year, is vastly different from some other year based on a current writer's intentions. This is ONE book (or, well, a series of books) that has nothing to do with anything else before or after it. They spent so much time trying to hype this thing as how true it was going to be to it's comic-form, this would completely undo that. If people want to boycott the film, fine, it will still make a lion's share of profit through the fans of the original story and on DVD, and if the book wasn't selling well before it'll surely bring in new people that will go out and get that, too.