Your Paragon of Virtue

Fuck you. You're worthless. Who are you to judge anyone, you useless piece of shit. You're terrible. Shut the fuck up. Seriously. You suck cock and I've seen no evidence to the contrary. Go fuck yourself. You're useless. Glad to hear Deion Branch was MVP, it would have shown huge bias to have Brady as MVP, bias for the QB/Celebrity. Agreed with Flyboy, T.O. should get no criticism. The man did all that he could, and then some. If Donovan McNabb didn't fuck it up, he would have been MVP and could've proved all the haters wrong, that he's not selfish for playing hurt, he is a GODDAMNED FOOTBALL PLAYER MOTHERFUCKER~! Seriously, when is it wrong for a football player to play with some injuries? The Freddie Mitchell experience is over, we can go back to laughing at the fact that he was on Jaywalking, as opposed to his lack of skills on the field.

Is Czech Republic trying to be stupid? Or is he just naturally a moron? It's funny, most of the people here compare McNabb to Vick like "HE"S WAY BETTER HE DOESNT THROW MANY INTERCEPTIONS HES A POLISHED PASSER~!!" I don't think I've ever seen a QB play as stupidly, and in some cases throw really bad passes. He threw some great ones, but their time management was PISS poor.

Actually, the problem I have with the 80s and the 70s lists are that most of what's on there is just the best of what they've heard, which is all you could ask for really, but considering most of them aren't old enough to remember anything important about the decade, I don't really trust their judgement. It's almost like they just picked landmark albums, most of what's on there is really popular, as opposed to the 90s list. The reason being they have much more knowledge of the music in the 90s, so they could dig a little deeper. I don' want to get into that popularity debate, since it's not an automatic negative or anything, but in a case like this, it's hard to discount the fact that odds are if you've only heard what's really popular, you're missing out on a lot. They weren't around for the decade to listen to the music that most others couldn't, so they don't really have an accurate view of things. The ranking is irrelevant, perhaps I just took it too seriously. As an aside. they don't do much well outside of reviewing general "rock" music, so it's kind of embarrassing when they try. I don't really go to them for hip hop reviews, just like I wouldn't go to, oh I don't know, Realestniggas.com for obscure indie rock. I wouldn't go there for hip hop reviews either, but that's a different story. You disliking that they left out something is the same as me disliking that they put in something. The difference is that since they put in more of what I dislike, I happen to not favour the list. That's it really.

Just in time for the Super Bowl. You should've extended it a day.

I actually think their lists have gotten steadily worse, with the 70s incarnation being the worst and, among a combination of things, stopped me from taking their site seriously. That 70s list was the best one they've done. Too much Led Zeppelin, there was a Van Halen album somewhere in there, and I didn't like the fact that Bowie's Low was Number One either. I haven't seen it in awhile, but I remember not liking it. Whatever, I don't really go to the site much anymore anyway. EDIT: There were other things I didn't like, but I didn't really put much thought into it since it's so insignificant, I just didn't want to make it sound like those were the ONLY reasons I was turned off by it.

Well I think he won the vote mainly due to how he feels about Gay marriage, abortion, and the "war on terror".

"We're sending in someone to negotiate!" *BLAM, BLAM* "Anybody else want to negotiate?" what is this a Clint Eastwood movie? If I had the technology, why would I stop it. I might be producing weapons, or new forms of power. (Probably weapons). It's like this. You win the lottery, a massive lottery, then a charity asks you to donate all of it, would you? No it's The Fifth Element, dumbass. Harsh, especially considering that it's not like the movie is quality viewing material that everyone should be watching.

How can you bet against this man?

Hmm, I disagree with Meltzer a lot on this one. My picks: Ortiz V. Belfort: People keep talking about how Belfort is so much better on paper than Ortiz, and I think that's bullshit. Tito is an *excellent* grappler, and will be able to take Vitor down at will. He'll just pound on him, as Tito is better on top than Vitor is on his back. Combine that with the fact that Tito actually does have pretty good striking (hard to tell when he's facing two excellent strikers in Liddell and Couture), and I see him as being better on paper. Vitor has great striking, but it's very straight forward and can be solved, ala Couture or Liddell. Will Ortiz be able to outstrike him? No, but he can stand with him till he finally gets the takedown. Belfort has really never shown great sub skills, and I don't think that's going to change now after a few months with BTT. If Vitor happens to catch him with one shot while standing, he'll win, but I don't think that will happen, so I pick Ortiz. It will be Randy-Vitor III all over again. Arlovski is a much more skilled fighter than Tim Sylvia, but Tim has that reach, and I don't think Arlovski wants to take this on the ground. If he did he should have it in the bag, so going by the fact that he has more chances to win than Sylvia, I'll *still* take Sylvia because I don't think he'll be able to get through that long reach. But who knows, maybe he's smartened up, and I think he would be the guy to lead this division, because of his vast skill set. Irvin will probably KO Kyle, I don't know much about Buentello so I can't really pick that fight. I think Lytle will *beat up* the "Heat". He's too good of a striker and his ground game is underrated, he's never lost a non-decision and Karo doesn't exactly have good cardio. Diaz should walk through Fickett, I wish Sean Sherk was in this position instead of Fickett, the UFC should give him another chance. Baroni should KO Sell, but funny enough if you go to his website, his "fans" have actually picked Sell to sub him as the overwhelming end to the fight. Tanner should beat Terrell, I don't know what Meltzer is talking about here. His striking is better, his wrestling is better, his ground game is not, but he's competent enough to survive. Combine that with the fact that he has much more experience, and his claim to fame is NOT KO'ing a *wrestler*, and I think he should take it in a brutal war. I don't think Terrell will be able to sub him, though he's much better in that facet of the game. I wish I could watch this live, but I can't find a bar that's airing, so I will have to wait a bit too.

I don't know who this guy is, but who does he think he is to just overthrow a guy whose got one of the main roles on a brand name, and ask to have another wrestler brought in to be a top guy too. How arrogant is he?

For all those complaining about Edge losing, what did you think the result would be?

I heard about it in the book, but I don't know if it's in the film. Anyway, I think it involves him putting a tube to a girl's vagina then putting a rat to run in there, sort of like the opposite of LEMMIWINKS~!

Well it's something that's being discussed elsewhere, so it's not like he's the only one who thinks they have a new album. You should see some of the stuff being discussed.

Gay? Nah.

I don't know, but in searching over the net, I had one of those weird things wheere you see a word over and over and it just looks weird to you. Tool makes no sense in relation to the band, at least on the surface, TOOL. Weird, it'll be awhile before I can look at that word again normally. I learned that the Chili Peppers are also releasing a new album in 2005, this is not what you were looking for but I found it so you might be interested.

Why put a spoiler tag over the whole post? Now if people want to see what movie you're talking about, they won't KNOW if they've seen it or not, so they have to skip over the whole thing. I'll help out, this one is Saving Private Ryan as well. I can't really think of anything at the moment, but I will say that Kathy Bates naked in About Schmidt was horrific.

Surprisingly, this is a sentiment that Conservatives use to criticize the way Liberals think, as in when they pander to criminals who don't deserve said pandering.

He sounds like an asshole as well as a dumbass, but I don't really expect an uproar over something like this, if only because most people probably don't see anything wrong with what he said.

With a hammer. Ba Dum PSH!

He never really fucked any of em, he just paid em a bunch to talk about what a fantastic lay he is. Just like the great Ty Cobb. First, you try to say that Prince is gay when it's not mentioned. When it's pointed out hot the women Prince has been with are, you try to talk about how Axl has slept with lots of hot women too. How that's relevant, I don't know. A day later, when the subject's passed and no one is really talking about it, you try to say Prince didn't sleep with anyone at all and that he paid them. As effeminate as Prince's album covers may seem, it's not nearly as gay as you defending the exploits of Axl Rose's penis, especially when no one asked about it. The only conclusion is that you're a closeted homosexual. Yeap, that's it.

Mario Sperry is fighting too I just noticed that. This card looks awesome, it will probably be better then anything PRIDE or the UFC put out all of last year. As long as it doesn't fuck itself over like so many of PRIDE's cards last year.

Explain to me the basis of your sig Captain, and is that actually Neil Young?

Erikson is coming back, facing Mirko's BJJ Trainer at PRIDE 29. See here.

So Emmitt Smith actually did retire, as a cowboy in fact. HOW do you feel about that?

This show is mainly for the undercard, there's something interesting about every match, save for maybe Irvin V. Kyle (Okay, not maybe). Who will emerge as a top threat in the WW division? Will Arlovski overcome Tim's reach and take it to him, as he is technically the better striker of the two? Who will win the battle of opposites, the least hyped fighter in the UFC aka Tanner or the most hyped fighter aka Terrell? Will Baroni demand the belt after he knocks out a relative unknown? Really, this show will be great, if they show a lot of the prelims, that's the problem with the UFC, I don't see why you don't advertise it, since a lot of people would buy it if it had all those great matchups guaranteed for showing, as opposed to the "well, they MIGHT be on".