Your Paragon of Virtue

Ban Carlos for the Death Threat.

Overall the event was kinda meh. Better than UFC 61, probably on par with 60. Both events featured a lot of inconsequential bouts with guys that probably won't make much noise in their division.

I thought Lindland won, but it was so close you can't complain either way. Lindland came close to finishing the fight more than Rampage did, there's no question about that, especially that RNC in the first round. But Rampage seemed to dominate over a longer period of time in the third round.

Hey Peggy, I see you're reading the thread. Don't let me down buddy. Give off another one of your awesome posts. EDIT: He left. Colour me disappointed.

WP Is pretty awesome. There's few if any posters that I would choose over WP when it comes to reading one of these long-winded posts. They're fucking brilliant.

Limey is offensive? I didn't even know that was a slur. What the hell ethnicity is that anyway?

It's been said before, but I'll say it again. Sylvia would be a much tougher fight than Schilt, if only because of his much better takedown D. That being said, Fedor has admitted that the Schilt fight was a disappointment because it was his first fight in PRIDE, and all that came with it (Big show, brand new rules for him, etc.) caused to fight poorer than he should have. Of course, you wouldn't think cyborgs have emotions like that, but this was wayyy back in the day, one of the older Fedor models. He's since been upgraded to a *much* better version.

I would love to see Fedor stack someone against a cage and beat the shit out of them. Believe me, he wouldn't need English to get over with the fans after that.

Two choice quotes right thurr.

Peggy, I clicked on it and it's fine. You're a gimmick though, so of course you won't go.

Well he trains out of MEH-HE-CO, where the roids are legal and plentiful.

I played one on PS 2 I don't remember what it was called, but it had all the MMA guys in it like Bas, MInotauro, etc. It even had Hogan and regular pro wrestlers in it. You could choose match modes, one would be Pro wrestling or one would be MMA. It was pretty cool, but the MMA was lacking in terms of simulation. This leads me to believe that Pro Wrestling will always offer the best fighting games, since real fighting is so difficult to make into a real sim. Whether the game I'm talking about was VPW or FPW I don't know.

Go ahead, if you're willing to organize stats and the like to see who is on top more power to you.

lol that's one of the first things you've said on this board that made me laugh out loud. Congratulations, you're not a fucking tool after all. EDIT: I can see why you might be offended by that, don't be. Let's be friends, you and I.

Complete weigh-in results. Quinton Jackson - 204 vs. Matt Lindland - 200.5 Bas Rutten - 214 vs. Ruben Villareal - 260 Vernon White - 204 vs. Lyoto Machida - 205 Loudine Sincaid - 205.5 vs. Jason Miller - 202 Art Santore - 185.75 vs. Ivan Salaverry - 184 Ron Waterman - 286 vs. Ricco Rodriguez - 298 Harris Sarmiento - 155.5 vs. Rob McCullough - 154 Marvin Eastman - 206 vs. Jorge Olivera - 206 Martin Kampmann - 184 vs. Edwin Aguilar - 185.5 Adam Arredondo - 158 vs. Antonio McKee - 163.5

So Ricco as expected is a fatass, weighing 298. Pele isn't even fighting. Ah well.

You said you've been in a bunch of street fights. Do you consider this one of them, or more than one since there were a group of people beating on the homeless guy?

Someone told me TKD was honestly a good standup method. I tried not to laugh.

So JerkSC why do you think he should allowed to teach that the holocaust didn't happen? What are you, an anti-semite or something?

In the CE thread... In this thread... In my PM Box...

I know you never sided with him now, because I assume you read the whole thing. You still seem to not understand the context though.

Looking through Wikipedia, the source you thought legitimate enough to cite: That's in America and that seems to say that you can't use hateful terms. Y2JerkSC will probably try to spin his way out of this one though.

No, I'm exactly right. Free speech means you should be able to say what you think without the government punishing you for it. If the Canadian government can fine people for insulting gays, then free speech isn't all that free. Try reading some Voltaire sometime. In this case, I believe their information to be accurate. I could've used other sources, but their info was the easiest to find. It shouldn't surprise you that Canada is dependent on the U.S. for its computer technology since you guys are also dependent on us for everything else that matters. In the United States people get fired or reprimanded for insulting gays all the time, or any minority for that matter. I'm sure it happens in Canada though I've never heard of it. Please link me to a source for the government fining someone. Again, you're REALLY nitpicking Y2JerkSC. Hate speech being fined on the rarest occasion is an example of how we don't have free speech? I suppose you think some of the Bush infringements on personal privacy makes him come across as a dictator as well? I don't believe insulting gays in public leads to a fine because it doesn't unless in the rarest circumstances, like I stated earlier, due to a caveat from a law created to protect our education system EDIT:You finally noticed the post. I HATE FAGS!!!!!!!!!!!! See? I'm still typing, I haven't been arrested or fined.....yet. Oh Lord, we're dependant on you for everything that "matters"? That's such a "Hacksaw Deon Duggan" statement I won't bother refuting it. If you want to talk about free speech IN THEORY as you seem to be doing, call one of the black kids in your school a nigger next time you see them (if there are any, you're in the midwest after all....kidding, you're overly sensitive about everything so you might have taken that seriously). When you get fired, appeal to the government that you're merely exercising your free speech. Tell us if you get your job back. If your free speech is really all that free, then the government should not only give you your job back but also compensate you for the embarrassment of getting fired over exercising your rights. I mean, if America allows free speech than that should be allowed right? Or are we making a distinction between government and country? Because if we are, what's the point of free speech if the country you live in won't allow it? EDIT: As for that post, if you actually looked at the whole article rather than just skimmed through the first line or so of it(You know, looked at the context of the law rather than take the short cut) you would have noticed what caused the law to come to pass, and when it's exercised, and why it's not really taken seriously outside of that context. I assumed you would have read through at least a little bit of the link that YOU provided. My bad. Anyway, my point was that rather than side with the lawmaker, you sided with the guy, since you knew why the law came to pass (to protect kids in school) yet you still sided with the anti-semite and his right to teach anti-semitism. Again, I guess I have to take that back since you didn't read the article. I gave you too much credit. You're not siding with an anti-semite, you're just a lazy moron.

America of fifty years ago? Siiiiiiick.