chaosrage

Now that's a heel.

I think everyone is so happy that the belt is off Cena that almost anyone would = ratings now.

Thanks for posting and telling me about it.

Um, what else would it be but his opinion? What's the point of saying this? You don't want us to discuss his list? Well, too bad.

I don't know if you were a fan at the time but you had to be to understand the match. This was BIG and I mean big. This was (and it was built up like this too) superman vs superman, the two biggest , charasmatic and completely indestructable faces pairing off againt each other in the newly formed Skydome in front of at least 60,000 people. This was the up and coming Ultimate Warrior (when compared to Hogan, Warrior was already established as unbeatable) against Hulkamania. A force that had never been defeated cleany. Everyone was talking about this. It was mentioned on the radio. When I went to the school the next day people were talking about it in the hallways. Even my mom was interested in the result. She even watched the match. You get the picture. There really hasn't been a match this big since. I know all of that, but it's still not a good match IMO. It's not even a little good. If you put say, Viscera and Snitsky in the main event of WM and hyped it up and made a huge deal out of it, you would have the equivalent of Hogan/Warrior from WM6. I don't think a match should be considered top 50 just for hype and atmosphere alone. To me, the atmosphere made it even more of a let down. It's like this was such a big match, millions of people were glued to their TVs, and this was the best they can do? This much anticipation for a 5 minute test of strength, a bearhug, and a headlock?

But Alvarez says there's no plan for the Rumble yet.

Wait, are those your star ratings or Meltzer's or someone else's? If they're yours, then why do you have 3 star matches ahead of 4 star ones?

Ok, the list was going fine until the last one. Whoever gave Hogan/Warriors 3 stars is being generous. The match was fucking awful. There was nothing to it but an excruciatingly long test of strength, punches, a long felt like it was on for 10 minutes headlock, and a bearhug. Seriously one of the worst matches of all time. As bad as the second Hogan/Warrior match was, at least they do more than you know, like 3 moves. For the list to recover after Hogan/Warrior, HBK/Bret ironman would have to be #1.

Dogs don't comprehend dates. Seriously? I don't have to waste my time transcribing this. If it bothers you that much... Pardon the ass hole tone. I am now going to bed. There's no need to get so defensive about someone asking a question about the date Mr Dog. He said it was a minor nitpick. And people say Shawn isn't a draw.

#1 Title - A tie. Both programs are terrible. Smackdown does have Kurt Angle, however the goodness of Angle is balanced out by suckiness of Mark Henry. #2 Title - Smackdown Tag Title - Smackdown Other Title - Smackdown Midcard - Raw. This is an easy one for me because it has RVD and HBK. Orton, Booker, Lashley, and JBL put me to sleep. GM - Don't care The Top Backstage Guys - Raw The Internet Show/Jobbers - Smackdown Women - Raw Announce Team - Raw. Wrestlecrap - Raw. Shelton's mama makes me laugh from time to time. That's more than I can say for the rest of the wrestlecrap. Time Slot - Raw Raw wins 6-4

channel change

You actually have a good wrestler on the list. What the hell happened there?

Who cares about the story, how was the sex scene?

38. Dean Malenko 39. Jerry Lynn 40. Kurt Angle 41. Alex Wright 42. Rob Van Dam

Well it makes you sound incredibly stupid since he never did a fart joke and rarely if ever did a dick joke. Dick jokes were HHH's thing in DX. You're coming off like a new fan that has never seen DX but still want to say it's bad anyway because you hate Shawn Michaels. Good guess, I've only been watching since 1992, and Michaels did sex and "potty" humour in DX, which is why I used the phrase, "Dick and fart jokes". It wasn't meant to be taken word-for-word. You're really looking for anything to argue about, aren't you? I stand by what I said. Boiling Shawn's excellent heel promos in 97 down to sex and potty humor makes me think you've seen very little of DX. Edit: Dear god, I forgot to check your age before. You were 10 years old in 97, no fucking wonder.

Well it makes you sound incredibly stupid since he never did a fart joke and rarely if ever did a dick joke. Dick jokes were HHH's thing in DX. You're coming off like a new fan that has never seen DX but still want to say it's bad anyway because you hate Shawn Michaels.

Really? Montreal 2005 as heel HBK. No way everything was scripted in that promo because he reacted to the crowd, what if the crowd didn't react that way. That was the best promo of 2005 and it showed HBK is one of the best on the mic as a Heel. All he did was milk the cheap heat from Montreal.... It had nothing to do with his ability on the mic, because the montreal fans still would have reacted strongly to Michaels for his direct involvement in the screwjob, he just egged them on for 15 minutes. That's true but it was still the best promo of 2005 and showed that HBK is one of the best on the mic as a heel. Put aside your bias against Shawn for a minute and watch it again. The crowd reaction went way beyond the typical "You screwed Bret!" chants, it's like they wanted to kill him by the time it was over. When has Shawn ever done a fart joke btw?

Yeah, it should be noted that he also apologized the next day for what he said. I'm from NO, the chocolate city line was hilarious but obviously blown out of proportion. Nagin isn't a racist, he was just trying to reassure a black crowd that they would be welcome back. And he said a few things without thinking. Later he admitted that the chocolate analogy was horrible. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060118/pl_nm/...icanes_mayor_dc

why not?

1. Mick Foley 2. The Rock 3. Steve Austin 4. Ric Flair 5. Shawn Michaels 6. Jake Roberts 7. Kurt Angle 8. Chris Jericho 9. Roddy Piper 10. Bret Hart

Serious response, 1997 with DX, Hart Foundation, and tweener Austin is miles ahead of every other year.

Well 90% of each show could be considered a waste of time, a mixture of bad wrestling, bad acting, and bad writing. So just singling out the women on it means you certainly have some issues when it comes to the females. (If you're not a prank that is)

The Mark Henry era of 2004-2006

I think you're a bad prank name.