SO.... because Taker won, it wasn't a good match..
but if it was the same content in the match and Cena won it would be a good match..
.
what happen to it being a good match no matter who won?
guess thats bias taker hating talking
or that bias taker marking talking from me... but whatever
No, Taker winning makes the match far worse than Cena winning.
Wrestling is about telling a story. If Cena won clean, it would have shown he could beat the legend, while Taker marks could say that he cheated and Taker had Cena pinned earlier.
As it is, Taker essentially squashed Cena, damaged the legitimacy of his finisher, and made it look like Cena couldn't hang with the big dog.
That finish just left a bad taste in the mouth, while if Cena could have beaten Taker clean, the build up would have been worthwile, and as a result the match would have been better.