Jump to content

bob_barron

Members
  • Posts

    13853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bob_barron

  1. Yeah, mine did. I've since switched streams. Can you provide a link please? Glad I didn't order the show, would've been so pissed to get Miz/Morrison v. Cryme Tyme rather than the other two choices
  2. My stream started acting weird toward the end, so the backslide didn't register with me. Good match though. Anyone elses stream cut out?
  3. The people v. TSM Chat room? You didn't miss much in the preview match, nothing happened.
  4. This is my first time voting on Election Day. I'm so excited to pull the lever.
  5. He's not "missing" per se, it's just that no one in wrestling has heard from him in years, so they've asked Meltzer to look at any missing persons database.
  6. Thank you so much, HTQ!
  7. What does that mean though? He's got 3 Oscars, I doubt he needs anymore. He makes movies with stories that are interesting to him, that can motivate him to get behind the camera. As I said, his movies become "Oscar-bait" because of his previous body of work and the talented that he can get to star in his movies. How is Gran Torino Oscar bait? Why can't it just be a well-made movie? Sometimes you make me sad. While the reviews aren't as great as Flags or Letters, it still has a positive rating on metacritic and buzz is very high on Jolie's performance.
  8. The first two were Disney Channel original movies.
  9. Shut up, CBright. How is Gran Torino "Oscar bait", just because it stars Clint Eastwood? The reason his movies are considered "Oscar bait" is that they are usually of very high quality so studios release them so they can get the maximum attention from awards voters.
  10. Can anyone with a f4w membership say what Dave and Bryan said in the audio update?
  11. That was a total CFL move by Payton. But seriously, I hate the NFL's broadcasting rules. SAINTS WIN!
  12. Ummm, the game's not over yet.
  13. The CBS guys having to describe each play, show a highlight and then analyse it is football retarded
  14. So they put Chargers-Saints on, show us a few plays and now we get the postgame show. Is that because of the Giants game starting?
  15. CBS put Saints-Chargers on. I'm trying here, but the Saints defence is terrible and now they're tired. Not much else I can do.
  16. That's the second pick called back today. This is giving me a heart attack
  17. Everytime NOLA crows about how the Saints are dominating a game, really bad things happen. Case in point: The Saints were "dominating" with a 37-20 lead. field goal, onside kick, touchdown, pick.
  18. Yea, tickets for Hannah cost between $10-15 I believe.
  19. Favre just had another pick 6
  20. SAW 1 was #3 behind Ray and The Grudge
  21. I'm not saying that the Rangers proves my point, but I don't think just because you can spend money doesn't mean you'll be good. And while they didn't win, lots of teams that weren't big spenders made it into the Cup finals- look at the Southeast for example. I don't agree with teams already being behind the 8-ball. If you spend wisely and have good player development and evaluation, you can do well even if you don't have gobs of money to spend.
  22. Busherwhacker Luke booking ROH? God help us
  23. Then they have to do the best with what they have. Look at the Rangers, they gave Bobby Holik 4 years, 28 million. It didn't make them successful or either good.
  24. The exclamation points were not warranted. I didn't think the playing field needed to be levelled, and I felt the league was perfectly competitive pre-lockout. I don't like that the NHL came in and said we're going to cancel a season so we can limit the amount of money the players can make. I don't see how it's bad for the NHL- the players deserve to make as much as they can get from the owners.
  25. A lot of owners are also penny pinchers who won't spend the money. We shouldn't have a cap just to accommodate people who won't spend the money, like Florida or Minnesota. You shouldn't punish teams who can and will spend the money to get free agents. If a team or ownership is unwilling or unable to spend the money, that's too bad. I don't thnk it's right to restrict the amount of money a team can spend on its players because of the have-nots of the league. People say it's unfair- I disagree. Every team can choose how they want to spend their money or how much they want.
×
×
  • Create New...