Guest Big McLargeHuge Report post Posted October 9, 2002 You're right, and we're also being shit on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 They may have heard us. But their sure as Hell not listening. Like I said when Vince hits the skids.... The fact HGH is the living embodiement of what's wrong right now will not be lost on him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 You got to get the same message across without Complete and utter flaming on him. Even though the Bastard Boot licker deserves it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 You're right, and we're also being shit on. Sure we are... We can't expect them to immediately say "gosh HGH sucks". They'll reason through it sooner or later. We must redouble our efforts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Big McLargeHuge Report post Posted October 9, 2002 I'd send feedback, but as soon as they see I don't have a wrestler's name in my e-mail, it'll be disregarded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 what we should look for is not a retraction of his dickless article but a Unspoken Change. HHH isn't a god and he shouldn't be considered the Savior of the WWE because he is Boffing Steph. a few years back he was punished because of the Kayfabe. So hewasn't a savior then. There got to be some element in WWE who dislike HHH's rise to power after being a Kliq member and part of that crap. I still think this is all because of Vince no longer capable of Helming his own ship. Thanks to the Austin Depression. He hand the reins to Steph and HHH and looky what happened. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 what we should look for is not a retraction of his dickless article but a Unspoken Change. HHH isn't a god and he shouldn't be considered the Savior of the WWE because he is Boffing Steph. a few years back he was punished because of the Kayfabe. So hewasn't a savior then. There got to be some element in WWE who dislike HHH's rise to power after being a Kliq member and part of that crap. I still think this is all because of Vince no longer capable of Helming his own ship. Thanks to the Austin Depression. He hand the reins to Steph and HHH and looky what happened. You are absolutely right. The victory will not be posted on WWE.com but we'll see it when Aardvark is curtain jerking with no mug time. The key is to alter the way the WWE employees look at the situation and have them influence Vince. It'll take a while but we'll win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted October 9, 2002 i don't know why you guys even bother responding to this, since it's obviously written in kayfabe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Big McLargeHuge Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Huh? Shouldn't it be bashing HHH then? Since he's a heel? Or do you mean he's just working us? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Chuck Woolery Report post Posted October 9, 2002 No, this lameboy writer is trying to get himself over as a heel. Duh. *spits water on WWE's kayfabe* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 No, this lameboy writer is trying to get himself over as a heel. Duh. *spits water on WWE's kayfabe* Probably. The fact is that this would not have been writtennthough unless they figure someone detests HGH in XPac heatish ways. They are trying to play it off as good heel heat. It's not. We need to convince them of that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest mach7 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 That Damn Good? You betcha! by Anthony Cali Unlike another writer on WWE.com who seems to think he is newsworthy enough to dedicate a lengthy monologue to putting himself over, I’m going to use this commentary to discuss the amazing Superstars that grace the ring, in particular, Triple H. Wow, holy fodder, Bat Man! Aside from this being the proverbial blow-job to Triple H.. I abso-fucking-lutely hate it when these WWE.com fucks use "insider" wrestling terms (ie: putting himself over). Kevin Kelly does this all the time (as does the rest of the ULTRA-annoying Byte This crew) and it just serves to make them look like a bunch of fucking geeks. Oops, they are? Nevermind. Why some people continue to question the decision making of a certified genius like Eric Bischoff is unbelievable to me. The man that brought you HLA and now RAW Roulette is incapable of making a bad decision. Did I mention I also hate it when writers mix "insider" shit with kayfabe? Give me a break, he goes on about the internet but then tries to make it out as if Eric Bicshoff really is the General Manager of RAW and that he's not just an on-air talent, like everyone else. Fucking lame.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted October 9, 2002 i didn't bother to read the responses, because I'm lazy, but can we stop posting these every week and yelling about how wrong they are. It's wwf, one writer's a "heel" and one is a "face" and they are both put on earth to spin the crap we watch ever week, just like those polls that say Bradshaw had the best match on ever PPV ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nevermortal Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Reading Anthony Cali's other articles, it seems to me that he's Stephanie's lotion boy. Either that or the middle man between HHH and his "doctor". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Leena Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Stop watching WWE. Try it, it makes life easier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest saturnmark4life Report post Posted October 9, 2002 What i don't get is why they blatently say the majority of their fanbase is wrong. Why purposely create fan backlash? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 What i don't get is why they blatently say the majority of their fanbase is wrong. Why purposely create fan backlash? See they are buying into the notion of the "silent majority".... You know why the "silent" are??? They either have no passion for the matters at hand or no ideas on how to improve things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Spaceman Spiff Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Everybody needs to relax. The article is obviously a work, designed to piss off the "smart" fans and/or get heat for HHH from the "casual" fans. Its purpose isn't to be an "Everybody Bow Before HHH" piece. This isn't the author's real feelings (if it is, that's pretty sad though). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest candie45 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Everybody needs to relax. The article is obviously a work, designed to piss off the "smart" fans and/or get heat for HHH from the "casual" fans. Its purpose isn't to be an "Everybody Bow Before HHH" piece. This isn't the author's real feelings (if it is, that's pretty sad though). Exactly. But it's still fucking funny to pick apart all the completely stupid and utter bullshit that this guy said. I think he did a pretty good job of doing his assignment which was probably pissing off the smarts. (And dropping everyone's wrestling IQ by about 25 points) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 the Vanilla Midget Liberation Front will topple the NasaBeak rule of WWE... time is on our side... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ravenbomb Report post Posted October 9, 2002 I mean would you really want a heavyweight champion who wears a mask and calls himself a freak? Mick who? Manwhat? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cataclysm911 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 *clears throat* Sammy's an idiot! He's an idiot! /quote Adam Sandler, Song #2 "Respect." What the hell is wrong with this cat? Does he think that the Internet Wrestling Community doesn't know that wrestling is scripted? "He won the Royal Rumble then went on to capture the WWE Undisputed title from Chris Jericho at Wrestlemania!" Yeah, so he came back and buried Jericho. Your point? Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot, over! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Its obviously the ploy to piss off the hateful Smarks and endear them to the "Real" Fans who fill into the areans. We obviously aren't suppose to be fans or have a opionion or have a say so. All they are doing is a Slow motion suicide. Because sooner or later Merchandise will stop being sold of HHH or Tapes... or whatever crap. And if it becomes more evident that HHH is not just a wrestler but a booker to the knowledge of all the Arena fans, then it will appear that every other wrestler on the roster are just Pawns to keep HHH lookin good and the rest looking bad. heaven Forbid that RVD get the spots of the night on Monday hitting his three signature moves. HHH has to run down and start the Kane the Killer contraversy. the more we are on the attack than the usual bitch moan fest on here. We actually flood their feedback. then they may see us as a nuisence but they will see us. If we really got organized we should go to live events locally and throw flyers at the fans or something. Smarks Invade Arenas LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted October 9, 2002 i figured his mentioning of eric bischoff as a genius who could do no wrong when he's just an on-air figurehead with no booking power whatsoever would clue everybody in that this was a work. any responses to it, however funny they may be, are just playing into the work. it's like writing jake roberts a letter calling him a bastard after he gave randy savage a snakebite, the guys behind it only take it as a sign that they're doing their job well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Its obviously the ploy to piss off the hateful Smarks and endear them to the "Real" Fans who fill into the areans. We obviously aren't suppose to be fans or have a opionion or have a say so. All they are doing is a Slow motion suicide. Because sooner or later Merchandise will stop being sold of HHH or Tapes... or whatever crap. And if it becomes more evident that HHH is not just a wrestler but a booker to the knowledge of all the Arena fans, then it will appear that every other wrestler on the roster are just Pawns to keep HHH lookin good and the rest looking bad. heaven Forbid that RVD get the spots of the night on Monday hitting his three signature moves. HHH has to run down and start the Kane the Killer contraversy. the more we are on the attack than the usual bitch moan fest on here. We actually flood their feedback. then they may see us as a nuisence but they will see us. If we really got organized we should go to live events locally and throw flyers at the fans or something. Smarks Invade Arenas LOL The Vanilla Midget Liberation Front is the answer.... Tell vince to shove that needle he thinks is a prerequisite to greatness up his own ass and give us workrate... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest humanoid92 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Geez, it's just kayfabe. You know, that thing that's been a staple of wrestling forever. So one of the website writers has taken on a character and used typical "heel logic" to back up his points. Big deal. This has gone on forever. There are no true good heel commentators anymore, so maybe it's becoming a lost practice, but ever hear Jesse Ventura defend, say, Rick Rude's, actions to Gorilla Monsoon? Ever read an article from WWF Magazine in the mid 90's by "Vic Venom"... a writer, who much like commentators, happen to cheer for all the bad guys? He's writing it in character. It's just that with the internet everyone's used to taking everything so literally. And wrestling has evolved to the point where heel writers don't have to justify a wrestler's behavior (like say, using steel chairs, or holding the ropes for leverage), but rather the perception of them on the internet. It's not that this columnist was mixing kayfabe and reality. He wrote the thing completely in kayfabe. It's you guys that are assuming it's all "smarkish" because well.... you're smarks. If anything, I miss the days of kayfabe. So I don't understand the backlash. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Geez, it's just kayfabe. You know, that thing that's been a staple of wrestling forever. So one of the website writers has taken on a character and used typical "heel logic" to back up his points. Big deal. This has gone on forever. There are no true good heel commentators anymore, so maybe it's becoming a lost practice, but ever hear Jesse Ventura defend, say, Rick Rude's, actions to Gorilla Monsoon? Ever read an article from WWF Magazine in the mid 90's by "Vic Venom"... a writer, who much like commentators, happen to cheer for all the bad guys? He's writing it in character. It's just that with the internet everyone's used to taking everything so literally. And wrestling has evolved to the point where heel writers don't have to justify a wrestler's behavior (like say, using steel chairs, or holding the ropes for leverage), but rather the perception of them on the internet. It's not that this columnist was mixing kayfabe and reality. He wrote the thing completely in kayfabe. It's you guys that are assuming it's all "smarkish" because well.... you're smarks. If anything, I miss the days of kayfabe. So I don't understand the backlash. Um of course we are Smarks... We are on a Board called....Smarkmarks Kinda tells you who frequents here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Geez, it's just kayfabe. You know, that thing that's been a staple of wrestling forever. So one of the website writers has taken on a character and used typical "heel logic" to back up his points. Big deal. This has gone on forever. There are no true good heel commentators anymore, so maybe it's becoming a lost practice, but ever hear Jesse Ventura defend, say, Rick Rude's, actions to Gorilla Monsoon? Ever read an article from WWF Magazine in the mid 90's by "Vic Venom"... a writer, who much like commentators, happen to cheer for all the bad guys? He's writing it in character. It's just that with the internet everyone's used to taking everything so literally. And wrestling has evolved to the point where heel writers don't have to justify a wrestler's behavior (like say, using steel chairs, or holding the ropes for leverage), but rather the perception of them on the internet. It's not that this columnist was mixing kayfabe and reality. He wrote the thing completely in kayfabe. It's you guys that are assuming it's all "smarkish" because well.... you're smarks. If anything, I miss the days of kayfabe. So I don't understand the backlash. Um of course we are Smarks... We are on a Board called....Smarkmarks Kinda tells you who frequents here. Yeah little clues like that let us in on where the clubhouse is. I don't buy that they aren't tweaking us. I have yet to have seen one that rubs our noses in Crips' push. This is eerily similar to Nash's shit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest humanoid92 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Yeah, so you're smarks. So am I. So what? The point is: why is it such a crime for a writer to play a character of sorts and defend one of the top heels in the company? I can't stand HHH since his return either, but I don't see the harm in the article. Is it really that big of a deal? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Its not a question of a guy is being a face or a heel writing a who the hell cares about the pencil Pusher in WWE is writing the article. Its just another addition to long litanly of crap the WWE wishes to shovel to protect their Darling HHH. Hell we aren't to High on Brock either. He was getting a Goldberg Monster push all the way to the World title. And the latest announcement that less wrestling and more soap opera crap fitting to HHH. a HHH on decline is something the WWE or HHH himself wants us to see. remember in 2000 against good wrestlers like Jericho, Benoit, and Angle HHH brought out the A material and we appreciated him for it. But now we go back to Dramas and crap to mask the degrading skills HHH seem to have thanks to his ringrust or his over grown of muscles. And Since he is in his temporary decline all other wrestlers who are equal or superior must not be at his level so they get shackled to side Angles. And of course no one can have any other belt. so titles get eliminated. this artcile is trying to keep people all hopped up on HHH and deflect what his booking is doing. Oh he is a Monster wrestler.... thats why he is where he is. right. its Shameless Ventura's push of Rick Rude was on Air. and he wasn't in the back pushing or booking. HHH isn't pushing anyone but himself. Majority of his Kliq friends are now gone retired or injured. All his friends is himself. Every other wrestler on Raw gets second or third billing under him now. No wonder Smackdown is the better show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
