Guest GameCop Report post Posted October 9, 2002 OH MY FREAKIN GOD!!! HOW BLIND ARE YOU PEOPLE? The article is dripping with SARCASM. The author HATES HHH; this was the only way he could show his displeasure for THE LAME without being fired. The article's sarcastic nature is painfully obvious. You guys should extol the author for having the balls to do what he did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest deadbeater Report post Posted October 9, 2002 Cali's 'sarcastic' pro-Eric Bischoff spiel ran very thin with the women's wrestling article, and went downhill from there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest AndrewTS Report post Posted October 10, 2002 OH MY FREAKIN GOD!!! HOW BLIND ARE YOU PEOPLE? The article is dripping with SARCASM. The author HATES HHH; this was the only way he could show his displeasure for THE LAME without being fired. The article's sarcastic nature is painfully obvious. You guys should extol the author for having the balls to do what he did. Sarcasm doesn't translate well to written articles. Unless you add something like "sarcasm mode on/off" you can't be too sure if it is intended to be sarcastic. So this can either by an intended verbal blowjob or sarcasm, which we can't be sure about. Either way, there is no way in hell anyone working for the WWE actually buys tHHHis bullshit 100%. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest snowfan Report post Posted October 10, 2002 OH MY FREAKIN GOD!!! HOW BLIND ARE YOU PEOPLE? The article is dripping with SARCASM. The author HATES HHH; this was the only way he could show his displeasure for THE LAME without being fired. The article's sarcastic nature is painfully obvious. You guys should extol the author for having the balls to do what he did. Sarcasm doesn't translate well to written articles. Unless you add something like "sarcasm mode on/off" you can't be too sure if it is intended to be sarcastic. So this can either by an intended verbal blowjob or sarcasm, which we can't be sure about. Either way, there is no way in hell anyone working for the WWE actually buys tHHHis bullshit 100%. well one person.... Hey-uh...that was-uh a nice-uh piece on me-uh.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Brian Report post Posted October 10, 2002 ::spits water:: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Czech Republic Report post Posted October 10, 2002 Anthony Cali, didn't he write the article about loving sports-entertainment sooo much and wrestling was pointless? Anthony Cali=Vince McMahon or Anthony Cali=HHH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest deadbeater Report post Posted October 10, 2002 Cali=Vince Russo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jester Report post Posted October 10, 2002 The article is pure work. It just has some smark references in it (the hhholding down and politicking) to send us into a tizzy. Which judging by this thread, it does very well. My problem with the article is that it mentions a wrestler I am thoroughly sick of in any capacity. I said it before, I want him to disappear now. I'm not interested in what can be done to "fix" him. You want to counter this article? Flaming HHH is not the way to go. They'll think they've succeeded in spreading heel heat. The best way to counter this article is by writing in "Very nice, but who gives a shit about HHH anyway? What's RVD [or name of your favorite underpushed wrestler] doing?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kid Kablam Report post Posted October 10, 2002 Well, I *do* agree with one thing: I mean would you really want a heavyweight champion who wears a mask and calls himself a freak? I certainly wouldn’t It's obvious to me that he was given this article to write to get HHH over as a heel to the casual fans. There's no possible way this guy can actually believe all that drivel. However, the problem is, how many "casual" fans visit the WWE website? I'm going to guess a small percentage, so that totally defeats the purpose of the article. Did you read this guys other pieces of shit he calls articles? I think his gimmick is basically a smark. There's just one thing I can't figure out, what side of Kayfabe is this guy on. He mentions HHH's backstage politics (he refutes the idea early on) but then he treats the titles like HHH really competed for them. MAKE UP YOUR FUCKING MIND!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites