Jump to content

Future of Goldust


Recommended Posts

Guest TheCynicalHateMongerFromHell
Posted
I am too...It has that Train wreck mystique written all over.

On the contrary, its something fresh. I enjoy edgy angles that take risks. After I see them I decide whether I like it, but the prospect of them always intrigues me.

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Choken One
Posted

Me Too...But I can sense more of WWE having no clue what to do and relying on Goldy to carry the angle.

 

I love Dark Edgy Angles...witness my infatuation with SOH.

Guest IDrinkRatsMilk
Posted

It would be better if they brought in somebody who actually had Tourette's. And don't censor anything they say... it's a disability, you can let that slide. I've seen it done.

Guest RavishingRickRudo
Posted

What is the WWF's track record with 'Edgy'?

 

0-1457?

Guest Youth N Asia
Posted
What is the WWF's track record with 'Edgy'?

 

0-1457?

That sounds about right...but who's counting?

 

uh, oh yeah...us

Guest TheCynicalHateMongerFromHell
Posted

Goldust worked out well. The Undertaker was an extremely dark character for its time. Sting as the crow was a dark, edgier, innovative wrestling character for the time. There has been some that have worked, and even if they didn't 'work', they may have been enjoyable to some people.

Guest Agent of Oblivion
Posted

I think they should cross Goldie over with the necrophilia angle.

 

Hi Katie Vi..FUCK FUCK CUNTLICKER ASS SHIT..T..TTT. CUNTWHORE!

Guest creativename
Posted
Apparently the WWE thinks "Extremely controversial" and "Mind-numbingly stupid" are the same thing.

Yup.

 

The thing is, though, I could see Dustin actually executing this very well--he seems to be able to turn anything into a positive. In all likelihood, he will find some way to make this entertaining.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...