Guest MARTYEWR Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 I know the reason for the high rating for Raw... Blassie saying "D-Von...Get The Tables!" Hell, no, it was... Blassie (to Bischoff): "What are you going to do, hang yourself?" Hogan WISHES he can be as hip as Blassie... <insert hip joke>
ChrisMWaters Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Let's just say this... Blassie = Ratings!
The Dames Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 I can't wait until the split PPV's.... JUST so Vince can realize what is wrong with the Raw brand when it pulls in about 500,000 buys less than the Smackdown brand. Dames Wow, You really think that? I think SD will do WORSE in PPV. Same here. SD's lack of bankable stars and HORRIBLE choices of main events are going to KILL them. In all fairness, if the Split PPV's started around October or so, then I would have definitely agreed with my previous statement 100%. However, you guys are right about SD!'s current status. With that being said, even without the great wrestling and Smackdown Six matches we were getting then, Angle, Brock, Benoit, Guerrero's, Rey, Matt Hardy, Hogan and Undertaker would most likely get more buyrates than the Klique and Goldberg right now, I'd hope. Smackdown needs main event heels...that's they're biggest void, in my opinion. Dames
Guest Infinit Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 4.4? Wow. Put into the equation that RAW in Canada "averaged a combined audience of 1.025 million viewers" (According to WWE Canada press release), I think there's quite a bit of back slapped going on @Titan Towers today... Although its good to see viewership up, I wish people would stay away just to constitute CHANGE...rising ratings will only promote the status quo. ARGH. I.
Guest hydroapple Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 The main reason why the rating rose was because most college students got out of college last week. I know that last year the Raw after most of the college students got out of college sucked, but it got a big increase in ratings.
The Dames Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 I know that last year the Raw after most of the college students got out of college sucked, but it got a big increase in ratings. That IS true... A lot of on campus housing do not have access to cable. Dames
Guest cabbageboy Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Nash in the main event = ratings baby! :-P
Guest Super Pissed Smark Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Is that a 25% increase in viewers? After that abortion of a show last week? I find those numbers highly suspect. Let's wait and see if they can hold the 4's over the next few weeks or if this is just some weird anomaly. If not, it'll be Nash-HHH all summer long.
Guest Vyce Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 No good can come from this. Management will just view the good ratings as a result of Goldberg or the Cliq or both. And we'll NEVER BE RID OF THEM. EVER.
Guest alkeiper Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 1. If SD draws more interest than Raw, Vince will figure that the Mr. America v Mr. McMahon storyline made it happen. 2. With the "This Is Your Life" show, I watched having been conditioned that a 20 minute interview segment led to something. Thus I watched waiting for Foley to turn on the Rock and a massive beatdown to watch. The segment sucked ass.
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Next week: NASH. HELMSLEY. GOLDBERG. THE FIRST EVER TRIPLE THREAT IRONMAN MATCH! RIGHT HERE ON RAW!!!
Guest NoSelfWorth Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Before the WWE Fanboy Network start creaming their Tighty Whiteys, let's see the ratings actually STAY up for a month or so. One high rating won't mean much if the rating sinks back down.
Guest bradolson Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 I think it is always the segment preceding the one that airs that causes the ratings. For example, someone tunes in during the 10:00-10:10 segment, likes what they see, and stays to watch the 10:10 to 10:20 segment, regardless of what that segment is. If that next segment sucks, they tune out, causing the 10:20-10:30 segment to have lower ratings, even though that viewer didn't even know what would be on. At least that is my opinion.
Guest RavishingRickRudo Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Bump in the road. One rating generally is meaningless. It's best to look at ratings in a 3 month period so trends can be seen. The problem with this rating is that what did the WWE do last week to get it? The only thing I can see that would draw interest is Austin as commish and the Goldberg Cage match. This was Goldbergs first TV match, right?
Guest geniusMoment Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Well there are lots of opinions being tossed around but I know there is one thing we all can agree on: Man ass equals ratings. Next week the first ever Flair thong invitational.
Guest Retro Rob Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 REASONS FOR THE INCREASE!! 1. School is winding down/over. 2. TV shows are wrapping up and reruns will be starting. 3. People have all gotten word about Goldberg's return. 4. It was a relatively strong show regardless of what the cynics say.
TheOriginalOrangeGoblin Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Ric Flair = Ratings. Whooooooooooo!
Guest Coffey Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 REASONS FOR THE INCREASE!! 1. School is winding down/over. 2. TV shows are wrapping up and reruns will be starting. 3. People have all gotten word about Goldberg's return. 4. It was a relatively strong show regardless of what the cynics say. I think LoD coming back helped too. I know my dad was interested in 'em...and he's not the biggest of wrestling fans. "Yell at me when Goldberg's on."
Guest Kotzenjunge Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Something we need to worry about is the fact that the post-match activities after Flair/Hurricane involved you-know-who. You know how they're salivating to justify so much of him and all, being part of the highest rated quarter hour means more of the same, not a push for Christian or Hurricane.
Guest snuffbox Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 I think the sheer anticipation that Hunter would show up after the Ric Flair-Hurricane match was what spiked the ratings.
Guest Cerebus Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Would anyone say a truly awful Raw (NECROPHILIA! NECROPHILIA!) could spike up in the ratings like this? I don't think so...though it is reasonable to say that a mediocre Raw could get a ratings spike by sheer dumb luck or coincidence. Though for the record, I thought Raw was phenomonal with the exception of Testicles and Big Lazy.
Guest LatinoHeat Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 I enjoyed the This is Your Life segment, yes. And it IS the highest rating Raw segment ever. Opposed- yes Unopposed- no. The highest rated segment ever was an Austin/Taker match that ran over the 11:00 mark. The rating for "this is your life" was 8.1. The rating for the Austin/Taker match was 9.6.
Guest the pinjockey Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Here you go you want another reason the ratings were solid. And I didn't read all the replies so it might have been mentioned. They made 2 big matches a week in advance, they advertised those two matches for a whole week....then wait here is the kicker They didn't do a god damn bait and switch. People tuned in a saw what they expected. Normally on Raw it seems like they di the switch in the first segment or something stupid like that and so people leave. Here they gave what was the advertised mains in I don't know how long. I would hope that accounted for a couple of tenths so they will keep the trend.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 It's Austin. And Goldberg. It's the nice build going on towards the Austin/Goldberg match that won't even ever happen.
Guest Downhome Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 The show peaked with a 4.9 rating for the 10 p.m. quarter hour, which contained the Goldberg vs. Christian match and the Ric Flair vs. Hurricane encounter. Well that's f'n great, as those were my two personal favorite parts of RAW, heh. Oh, wait a sec... ...I didn't think Goldberg was a draw, and I also thought that Flair's day of being usefull for drawing was over also. Wait, that's just what many here have stated. Perhaps a lot of us "smarks" don't know as much as we think we do, in terms of knowing what draws for the casual fans that is. I wish we could see a break down of EACH segment each week, as I'm really interested in what Jericho/Nash pulled. Still, this rating isn't much to get TOO worked up over, let's just see if they can sustain a rating of 4.0+. I have always said that the ratings wouldn't mean much of anything untill they either went UNDER 3.0 or over 4.0, and for two of the past three or four weeks, they HAVE went over 4.0. I hope this is a trend, perhaps a bit of interest is returning.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 "...I didn't think Goldberg was a draw, and I also thought that Flair's day of being usefull for drawing was over also. Wait, that's just what many here have stated." Um...people watching the TV doesn't draw the WWE any money. His first match at Backlash delivered disapointing numbers...where they actually woule make the money. I guess people will watch him for free...but not pay for him. Yeah...he's a draw...
Guest Downhome Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 "...I didn't think Goldberg was a draw, and I also thought that Flair's day of being usefull for drawing was over also. Wait, that's just what many here have stated." Um...people watching the TV doesn't draw the WWE any money. His first match at Backlash delivered disapointing numbers...where they actually woule make the money. I guess people will watch him for free...but not pay for him. Yeah...he's a draw... Since they started pushing/promoting him differently than the first week or so since he debuted, the interest has been building little by little. Right now he's drawing/pulling in ratings, and one can not deny that. As for drawing buyrates, there is really no way to truly tell that anyhow, as I've said for years. Many fans don't order a PPV if there is only one match on it they want to see, it takes a solid card to really sale a PPV. Goldberg is basicly starting over, thus his new tights, music, and to an effect in-ring style. Give him a few months and then see if the PPV's start pulling in more buyrates, but like I said, even if they started doing really good there is really no way to tell if HE is drawing or not. The ratings, it's the best we have to go on seeing how we can see whose segments are getting what.
Guest Downhome Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Um...people watching the TV doesn't draw the WWE any money. By the way, you are very much wrong. Not only is it just common sense that higher ratings mean more income for WWE as a whole, but as Dave Scherer has said... They get paid a fee from Viacom for the rights. I am not sure what their split on ads is now, but in any event a better rating means more money in the long run. ...I asked him for specifics about this, and that's what he told me. I do know that higher ratings mean more money for whatever is pulling said rating, that's just a known fact I thought.
Guest Austin3164life Posted May 14, 2003 Report Posted May 14, 2003 Vince will now include more segments with Goldberg and Kevin Nash. Smell the ratings.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now