Guest Nevermortal Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 From the Steiner Screw Up to the most anticlimactic finish in Main Event history, I can safely dub WWE Bad Blood as the worst Pay Per View I have ever watched. Halfway through, I decided to play PING PONG. If I'm playing ping pong instead of watching wrestling, you gotta know something is wrong. I hope this makes them reconsider the split PPVs.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Well keep playing Ping Pong, cause that PPV was the best since WM!
Guest Austin3164life Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 This really was a horrible pay per view. I saw it for free on webcast and I still feel cheated out of my free time (time is money).
Bored Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Well keep playing Ping Pong, cause that PPV was the best since WM! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...please Johnson go here...its safe here: http://s2.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/gentopic...asp?board=32676
Guest CanadianChick Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 I didn't see it, but it couldn't have been on KOTR '95 levels, could it? I mean, HBK/Flair and Jericho/Goldberg had to be at least okay, right?
Guest Breetai Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 From the Steiner Screw Up to the most anticlimactic finish in Main Event history, I can safely dub WWE Bad Blood as the worst Pay Per View I have ever watched. Halfway through, I decided to play PING PONG. If I'm playing ping pong instead of watching wrestling, you gotta know something is wrong. I hope this makes them reconsider the split PPVs. It's not that the PPV was bad, it's just that the war in Iraq, the war on terror and the poor state of the economy has got you down. Our product is growing by leaps and bounds, new talent will and is being pushed, and we expect to be back to 'buisiness as usual' in no time.
Guest Nevermortal Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 That Pay Per View made me ashamed to be a wrestling fan. Seriously, IT WAS THAT BAD. The only positive thing to come out of it was the Steiner Superman Dive.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 HBK/Flair was classic. The HITC was quite good. The rest was shit, but those two alone saved the ppv.
Guest Repo Man jr Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 I think it's basically the short matches, the shitty endings, and the mind numbing super long skits that went all night made it horrible ppv 4 me. If that was RAW I would of been channel surfing.
Guest Nevermortal Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 HBK/Flair was classic. The HITC was quite good. The rest was shit, but those two alone saved the ppv. By classic, do you mean horribly boring and terrible? And by quite good, do you mean anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits?
Guest Nunzio Cardozo Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 By an anticlimactic, slow, drizzling shit, do you mean, you took one, then looked in the toilet bowl and realized you saw Bad Blood?
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 HBK/Flair was classic. The HITC was quite good. The rest was shit, but those two alone saved the ppv. By classic, do you mean horribly boring and terrible? And by quite good, do you mean anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits? Did I say, "horribly boring and terrible"? Did I say, "anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits"? I don't think I did. I say what I mean and mean what I say. This ppv was the best of the year.
Guest JHawk Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 HBK-Flair was good, not a classic. HHH-Nash was saved by the blood and Foley's Nestea Plunge into the cage. Goldberg-Jericho was tolerable, and Christian-Booker would have been tolerable with a pinfall victory. The rest was crap, including the Redneck Triathalon, which got what, six different segments? Maybe seven? I think that got more time than the undercard combined.
Guest Nevermortal Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 HBK/Flair was classic. The HITC was quite good. The rest was shit, but those two alone saved the ppv. By classic, do you mean horribly boring and terrible? And by quite good, do you mean anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits? Did I say, "horribly boring and terrible"? Did I say, "anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits"? I don't think I did. I say what I mean and mean what I say. This ppv was the best of the year. Are you not good at detecting sarcasm? Nunzio Cardozo does your gimmick better than you. Go away.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 How HBK/Flair could be called "classic" astounds me... With the retarded psychology, stupid(and totally USELESS) table spot, and that lame ass finish, it would called fucking awful on any decently booked show.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 HBK/Flair was classic. The HITC was quite good. The rest was shit, but those two alone saved the ppv. By classic, do you mean horribly boring and terrible? And by quite good, do you mean anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits? Did I say, "horribly boring and terrible"? Did I say, "anticlimactic, slow, and the drizzling shits"? I don't think I did. I say what I mean and mean what I say. This ppv was the best of the year. Are you not good at detecting sarcasm? Nunzio Cardozo does your gimmick better than you. Go away. I hope I don't get in trouble for this, but sorry.. GIMMICK! YOU DUMB FUCK! THIS PPV WAS GOOD. I WOULD NEVER LOWER MYSELF TO A GIMMICK STATUS! GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK CRANIUM AND EVERYBODY WILL BE BETTER OFF! I"M GLAD YOU MONKEY'S THINK HE"S FUNNY, BUT NEVER, AND I MEAN NEVER, COMPARE ME TO A GIMMICK AGAIN!
Guest goodhelmet Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 hey apo, get those crossface comments in already
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 How HBK/Flair could be called "classic" astounds me... With the retarded psychology, stupid(and totally USELESS) table spot, and that lame ass finish, it would called fucking awful on any decently booked show. That finish was classic, it paid tribute to the Horsemen. Flair always won, by any means, he won. Just like he did tonight. It was classic.
Guest Austin3164life Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 This was basically a more overbooked episode of Raw, with another 40 minutes added on.
Guest bravesfan Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Great American Bash 1991. Wrestlemania IX. Uncensored 1995. Slamboree 1995. King of the Ring 1995. Uncensored 1996. Road Wild 1998. King of the Ring 1999. Judgment Day 2003.
Guest Nevermortal Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Great American Bash 1991. Wrestlemania IX. Slamboree 1995. King of the Ring 1995. Uncensored 1996. King of the Ring 1999. Judgment Day 2003. Seen WMIX, KOTR '95, JD 2003, and Uncensored '96. Bad Blood beats them by soooo much. Everything was shit. And the Redneck Triathalon stuff dropped the final few nails in the coffin. If they ever want a POW to talk, they should lock them in a room by themselves with this pay per view on. SHEER FUCKING TORTURE.
Guest JHawk Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 I'd compare tonight with Slamboree 95 -- not good, but certainly not as offensive as some of the others that bravesfan mentioned.
Guest Lord of The Curry Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 How HBK/Flair could be called "classic" astounds me... With the retarded psychology, stupid(and totally USELESS) table spot, and that lame ass finish, it would called fucking awful on any decently booked show. That finish was classic, it paid tribute to the Horsemen. Flair always won, by any means, he won. Just like he did tonight. It was classic. How does Flairs cock feel in your ass? Seriously. Ease up. Does this mean that every finish where somebody has a buddy run in for them is a tribute to Flair and The Horsemen? Classic my pale Irish ass.
Guest bravesfan Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Great American Bash 1991. Wrestlemania IX. Slamboree 1995. King of the Ring 1995. Uncensored 1996. King of the Ring 1999. Judgment Day 2003. Seen WMIX, KOTR '95, JD 2003, and Uncensored '96. Bad Blood beats them by soooo much. Everything was shit. So you're saying, there were REDEEMING FACTORS to those four PPV's?!? ...ok, JD2003 had one decent **3/4 match, but the others you mentioned were WORSE than this, especially when they had a full roster to work with.
Guest AndrewTS Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 The worst wrestling Pay Per View ever was Heroes of Wrestling, at least that's what everyone who has seen that says. Worst WWE/F one was KotR 95. Bad Blood had a good match, thus it isn't even near as bad.
Guest Nevermortal Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Great American Bash 1991. Wrestlemania IX. Slamboree 1995. King of the Ring 1995. Uncensored 1996. King of the Ring 1999. Judgment Day 2003. Seen WMIX, KOTR '95, JD 2003, and Uncensored '96. Bad Blood beats them by soooo much. Everything was shit. So you're saying, there were REDEEMING FACTORS to those four PPV's?!? ...ok, JD2003 had one decent **3/4 match, but the others you mentioned were WORSE than this, especially when they had a full roster to work with. WM IX was special because its Wrestlemania. I actually remember being fairly entertained by some of it. The '96 uncensored had Regal/Finlay and the Tower of Doom cage. While not a good match, at least it was unique. JD 2003 entertained me a bit with the Stretcher Match and the Ladder Match. Ok.....I guess its not worst than KOTR '95. But who can forget people throwing shit at Mabel? That was great.
Guest bravesfan Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Worst WWE/F one was KotR 95. That show was destined to fail, so I'm going to have to disagree with you. Wrestlemania IX had Bret Hart on top of the company, where he could've just retained (or lost to Yoko), yet they proceed to put the title on Hogan, setting the company back 2 years.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 How HBK/Flair could be called "classic" astounds me... With the retarded psychology, stupid(and totally USELESS) table spot, and that lame ass finish, it would called fucking awful on any decently booked show. That finish was classic, it paid tribute to the Horsemen. Flair always won, by any means, he won. Just like he did tonight. It was classic. How does Flairs cock feel in your ass? Seriously. Ease up. Does this mean that every finish where somebody has a buddy run in for them is a tribute to Flair and The Horsemen? Classic my pale Irish ass. Good job, real clever. It was a great match. And I'm glad your ass is pale, and also sorry. Go to the pool.
Guest AndrewTS Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 bravesfan: How does that make Mania IX worse? It's possibly the worst Mania ever, but you're just listing a disappointing aspect of it. What really killed KotR 95 was HBK being eliminated via double count out, since he was the favorite to win by the fans, plus Taker-HBK would have been watchable and probably a pretty hot match to boot. So both of them disappointed since there was one aspect of KotR 95 that could have been redeeming.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now