Guest The Mighty Damaramu Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 Ok sorry if this was covered in the RAW thread but now are we to believe that Kane is just some nutjob that thinks he got scarred? His parents were burned alive so he thinks he was burned to? Well that explains the fact that there are no scars. But then how does this explain the Undertaker's reactions to Kane being alive? I mean he thought he was burned alive. How does this explain Kane being locked in a basement his whole life? What about the McMahon-Helmsley Facgime's reaction to his face when they took the picture? And how did he drive down the street at 90 mph and kill a girl!? Man they don't think this crap out...... Oh and what about JR and King's reaction to the mascara ridden face of Kane? They acted like he was burned. But now he's just a psycho with delusions. You know they've fucked with Kane's story so much over the years that there is no possible way to end this with anything resembling a coherent story.
Guest Plushy Al Logan Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 Rikishi: I dood it, I took Kane's mask off. I dood it for the people. That mask was holding my people down.
Guest JAxlMorrison Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 He may or may not be a nutjob, this isn't my concern. Here is what is. He is maybe the sole reason i stopped watching Raw. Everything else i could deal with, but not Kane being the focus of the shows, especially when this storyline is so ludicrous.
Guest Retro Rob Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 He may or may not be a nutjob, this isn't my concern. Here is what is. He is maybe the sole reason i stopped watching Raw. Everything else i could deal with, but not Kane being the focus of the shows, especially when this storyline is so ludicrous. Actually the storyline is starting to make sense now.
Guest Insane Bump Machine Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 Actually the storyline is starting to make sense now. I think that's stretching it.
Guest Retro Rob Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 I don't think so. They finally explained why Kane doesn't look scarred and why he does what he does. Sure there are still some logic gaps, but compared to the last few weeks I would say last night's twist was a step in the right direction.
Guest DarthLordOfWrestling Posted July 15, 2003 Report Posted July 15, 2003 The first Week he had lots of make-up on that was suppoes to look like they were scars. The next week I guess they forgot or they realized it looked mad fake
Guest RavishingRickRudo Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 The story makes perfect sense... ... if you take it in "chunks"...
Guest Space_Cowboy Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 The only nutjobs involved are the WWE writers that came up with this convuluted mess.
Guest alkeiper Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 Until Kane set Ross on fire, the angle actually had taken a turn for the better. Kane reminds me of Boo Radley now.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 omg.. KaneisaLunatic.. *goes off running*
Guest Choken One Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 In theory... If we're told he was a monster through the book...Then was an heel. He turned face in the eyes of the reader in the end...
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 Actually he was hypnotized by Vince Russo and now he thinks the whole angle really happened. It was an old MCmahon family secret to help keep people from breaking kayfabe.......
The Dames Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 I think I was able to cover all of the bases in my article. What do you think, Damaramu? Dames
Guest DarkHollywood Posted July 16, 2003 Report Posted July 16, 2003 It's HHH's fault! LOL j/k. Wait...maybe it is...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now