Guest RavishingRickRudo Report post Posted July 23, 2003 No SD spoilers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Should we have spoilers? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Smackdown is in Fresno, CA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mulatto Heat Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Well, SD is in California, thus on Pacific Time. SD always starts at the same time no matter where they are, and I find that usually spoilers come around at 11 PM local time at the very earliest. It's now 10:30 PM PST. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Yeah...It's kinda late even for West Cost Spoilers... They should be in about a Hour or so.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boobshaw 0 Report post Posted July 23, 2003 The best part about this post is that we are all just assuming that shane WILL come back. I just want to point out how I love how the Torch doesn't have any faith in their info by making sure that they add "But Rock said he would be there and wasn't, so anything can happen" so that when he DOESN'T show up, they can say "We didn't promise it". To be honest, I don't think Shane will show up at all. Sure, he would be a good face for kane to fight for a while (cause they need them), but don't forget Shane's continuing disinterest in getting back in the ring. And, everyone knows that if he comes back for "just one Raw" in a major storyline role that he will be asked to be on TV for at least 3 weeks. And, he has stated that he doesn't want to do that at all. If Shane does come back, more power to him, and I hope it makes for compelling television (because we all know, McMahon + TV Air Time + Hogan's Air Guitar = Ratings). And speaking of, Raw's 4.2 - ALL LINDA MCMAHON BABY!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest NoCalMike Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Another McMahon ready to take the spotlight away from the workers. UGH.....Sorry guys, but Shane is NO DIFFERENT, and is worse than Linda being on TV. Linda may be boring, but she isn't taking any heat from the wrestlers. "WWE is McMahons" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Shane Vs. Kane I kinda like the concept. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 What Concept? The Rhyming names? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Sakura Report post Posted July 23, 2003 The best part about this post is that we are all just assuming that shane WILL come back. I just want to point out how I love how the Torch doesn't have any faith in their info by making sure that they add "But Rock said he would be there and wasn't, so anything can happen" so that when he DOESN'T show up, they can say "We didn't promise it". It's not that Torch doesn't think the news is credible...it's that WWE changes their plans all the time because they write RAW on a napkin hours before the show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boobshaw 0 Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Still, stick with your shit. Cause if 1bob comes by and says "YES FOR A FACT SHANE WILL BE ON!" then who looks better, 1bob or Torch (well, if Shane is on)... granted, 1bob takes the risk of being completely wrong. The internet is such a dirty dirty place Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 It's 2:30...NO FUCKING SMACKDOWN SPOILERS YET? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted July 23, 2003 It's 2:30...NO FUCKING SMACKDOWN SPOILERS YET? ...Choken this is about RAW spoilers for this coming RAW. Not Smackdown this tuesday... At least that's what I got by the topic title. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Yes...But we talked about it a little on the first page when AS asked about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rendclaw 0 Report post Posted July 23, 2003 If the McMahons took sick bumps every week, I would watch more, for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Yes...But we talked about it a little on the first page when AS asked about it. Ah. Ok then, didn't read the first page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Sakura Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Still, stick with your shit. They are. The story is that the plan is for Shane to return. They're not saying they're unsure if that's true. They are sure THAT is true. What they said at the end is that knowing the WWE that plan may change. The fact that they're saying the plan may change is GOOD journalism. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Is this the longest we've ever waited for Spoilers? EVER? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 11and0baby Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Actually Shane coming on TV is a natural progression in Kane taking down people in power. First We had Bischoff Then We Had Austin Then we Had JR Then We Had Linda Then We Get Shane Then We Get Vince. After Kane has done them all in, The Next Logical step is to bring Taker in and see if his 'Brother' can control him. So Bitch all you want. It looks the writers are actually planning something out using logic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Austin3164life Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Even though Shane is tolerable out of the McMahon clan, I still don't want to see another McMahon on television when we should see a wrestler built up to Kane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Actually Shane coming on TV is a natural progression in Kane taking down people in power. First We had Bischoff Then We Had Austin Then we Had JR Then We Had Linda Then We Get Shane Then We Get Vince. After Kane has done them all in, The Next Logical step is to bring Taker in and see if his 'Brother' can control him. So Bitch all you want. It looks the writers are actually planning something out using logic. Shane's gonna get his ass on yet another PPV and take a paycheck away from someone. So it's not good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 On yet another? You act like he tours with them... He hasn't done a damn PPV in 2 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 11and0baby Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Shane is probably only going to be on Raw and get his ass handed to him. Everyone assumes he is going to on the PPV but I don't think they are gonna throw away the Kane v RVD match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 and besides...I'm just still going with the Shane takes over Mommies Position and is the UBER-FACE to combat Kane and will bump for him... RVD will get his match but in an Non-Scantioned Cage Match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 23, 2003 On yet another? You act like he tours with them... He hasn't done a damn PPV in 2 years. HE SHOULDN'T BE DOING THEM AT ALL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Korgath Report post Posted July 23, 2003 I'm just wondering who else is going to face Kane at the moment, since Kane is currently booked between IC Title competitors and World Title squashes. It doesn't make sense unless you intend to build up Kane VS RVD around the World Title. Except that would make TOO MUCH sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Actually Shane coming on TV is a natural progression in Kane taking down people in power. First We had Bischoff Then We Had Austin Then we Had JR Then We Had Linda Then We Get Shane Then We Get Vince. After Kane has done them all in, The Next Logical step is to bring Taker in and see if his 'Brother' can control him. So Bitch all you want. It looks the writers are actually planning something out using logic. Shane's gonna get his ass on yet another PPV and take a paycheck away from someone. So it's not good. Well, I guess you're right seeign as Kane/Shane would be a fun spotfest, and RVD/Kane would be a **** psychological battle. Oh wait... no it wouldn't. I'm entertained by Shane, boo fucking hoo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Retro Rob Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Uh Sure GameCop. I'm sure the WWE Roster FLOCK to here. Well, we are probably being watched by someone. Unfortuantely, that someone is probably Howard Finkel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Uh Sure GameCop. I'm sure the WWE Roster FLOCK to here. Well, we are probably being watched by someone. Unfortuantely, that someone is probably Howard Finkel. HI HOWARD! Love the Hair! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Hamburglar Report post Posted July 23, 2003 Well, I guess you're right seeign as Kane/Shane would be a fun spotfest, and RVD/Kane would be a **** psychological battle. Oh wait... no it wouldn't. I'm entertained by Shane, boo fucking hoo. Absolutely spot on. At least in Shane's spotathon matches I know I'll probably be surprised by something. Also, Shane times his face comebacks way better then RVD ever has. And when Shane gets the crap beaten out of him it actually really looks like it, unlike Rubberman Van Dam. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
