Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some people here said their Wrestlemania match wasn't all that great(Angle's bad neck, the botched Shooting Brock Press, etc.), some liked it. Some people said their Summerslam match wasn't as good as their Wrestlemania match(the re-done F-5 Spot, McMahon interference, etc.), but others like it. So which one is really the better match? Just wondering.

Guest Choken One
Posted

Here we ago...ANother 5 page debate about selling and Work rate and shit...

 

Let's RUMBLE!

Posted

I enjoyed the WMXIX bout much better. Even though Kurt was nursing a BAD neck, and Brock f'ed up the SSP, It was still a solid match. The Summerslam match didnt keep my attention as much and seemed like it was missing that little something.

Posted
Here we ago...ANother 5 page debate about selling and Work rate and shit...

 

Let's RUMBLE!

Yeah, how dare they discuss wrestling on a wrestling message board!

 

I'd love to participate in the discussion, but I didn't see Summerslam. *grumble*

Guest ManKinnd
Posted

Wrestlemania by a little. There was so much emotion there, I was feeling every bump along with Angle. The match was such an experience, even with the blown SSP.

As for SS, it was just a solid match between two good workers. Toss in McMahon interference, a redone spot and an illogical finish and you've got a worse match.

 

WM - **** or ****1/4

SS - ***1/2 or ***3/4

Posted

Well......I liked the SS match a little more.....but this is how I see the 2 matches...

Mania: Super Brock Lesnar destroys Angle on the road to it and in the end proves that he's better than Angle.

SS: Super Kurt Angle destroys Brock during the match and makes him look like a complete fool at the end thus proving he is better than Brock.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...