Guest Mulatto Heat Report post Posted October 20, 2003 I don't understand why he continues to watch every show, month after month, if he "hasn't been entertained by the WWE" since Owen Hart's death? ..Then why is he still watching and writing reviews every single week? Is that true? That long ago? Because he was quite pro-WWF for the majority of 2000 and in various times during 2001. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2003 His opinion on the show seem about right... the only thing I find odd is that when I e-mailed him asking him why he posted the Ric Flair DVD line up without giving an opinion on it (too few matches seems to be a big complaint with people I talk to on IRC, yet everyone here seems to be drooling over the damn thing), he said that the Blog was supposed to be free of wrestling opinions and he was just passing it along. Does this mean a Quickie Raw Rant in the blog only as well? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2003 Is that true? That long ago? Because he was quite pro-WWF for the majority of 2000 and in various times during 2001. According to his book, yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BionicRedneck Report post Posted October 20, 2003 why is he still watching and writing reviews every single week? Because, in reality, he loves this promotion. He is a fat, (probably) smelly, lonely loser who needs this promotion to be around so he has something to do with his pathetic life. Yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 20, 2003 why is he still watching and writing reviews every single week? Because, in reality, he loves this promotion. He is a fat, (probably) smelly, lonely loser who needs this promotion to be around so he has something to do with his pathetic life. Yes. Yeah, he should follow your example and start spouting off cliche insults that haven't been funny in two years about people they claim to care nothing about yet can't stop talking about. Then he won't be so pathetic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted October 21, 2003 How DARE People accuse Scott Keith of having friends. He probably hired people to pretend they like him. And I don't know HOW anyone can say the show sucked. I'm usually very hard on some matches because if I mark out, it means its really good, and if I don,t it sucked. I was on my feet for the whole UT/Brock match buying into every pinfall. Maybe for once the chain WOULDN'T be used. The rules never said "Must retrieve the chain before winning." The only match I didn't watch was Eddy/Show (Blown out from marking out for Cena/Angle). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BionicRedneck Report post Posted October 21, 2003 why is he still watching and writing reviews every single week? Because, in reality, he loves this promotion. He is a fat, (probably) smelly, lonely loser who needs this promotion to be around so he has something to do with his pathetic life. Yes. Yeah, he should follow your example and start spouting off cliche insults that haven't been funny in two years about people they claim to care nothing about yet can't stop talking about. Then he won't be so pathetic. erm....yeah. Who exactly can't I stop talking about? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2003 It wasn't directed towards you in general, but rather, this group of people who constantly talk about SK and say the same old things about him being a hack and being fat. We get the point, but if they hate him so much, why are they always talking about him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2003 "a few of you may have noticed that your commenting privilages have been revoked. That's because this is a website about me and how great I am, and if you're looking for a free and open exchange of ideas and thoughts, feel free to fuck off" Yeah, I don't know why people dislike him either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2003 "a few of you may have noticed that your commenting privilages have been revoked. That's because this is a website about me and how great I am, and if you're looking for a free and open exchange of ideas and thoughts, feel free to fuck off" Yeah, I don't know why people dislike him either. Is that from the old smarks board? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2003 No, it's from the Blog. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted October 21, 2003 No, it's from the Blog. Oh.....sounds like the kind of crap he would say at the old smark board....I seem to remember him banning people for disagreeing with him....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Redhawk Report post Posted October 22, 2003 I don't think that the "Stephanie never quit, it was Linda throwing in the towel" is supposed to keep Stephanie looking strong, but instead is going to be used as part of the angle when she returns in a month or two. It actually shows continuity in a way that's rarely seen anymore (using what happened to explain something later on). Sometimes, I think that people are so bent on being negative that they don't step back and look at the big picture. Okay, but how about using all that thought and planning in angles that DON'T involve McMahons? why wasn't someone thinking long-term during Kane's last two big storylines? Why wasn't anyone carefully planning around WRESTLERS, not OWNERS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
