Guest MikeSC Posted December 24, 2003 Report Posted December 24, 2003 From the crack-riddled mind of Tammy on NWA-TNA this past week: Which brings to me what energized my interest in wrestling again. This past weeks, WA-TNA. I read the re-cap by 411's guy, and it did the show NO JUSTICE. So if you only read that recap and judge when to buy the replays, let me stress to you how great this show was. It was the best PPV I've seen all year, its the best wrestling card I've seen all year. It is 10 times better then this years Wrestlemania will be. I assure you of that. The card? Jeff Jarrett vs Sting (Non-Title) Fallen Angel vs. Chris Sabin Michael Shane vs. Low-Ki (X Division Championship Match) America's Most Wanted vs. Gilberti & Young (Street Fight) Simon & Swinger vs. AJ Styles & D-Lo Brown Raven, CM Punk, Julio Dinero vs. Red Shirts & Abyss (Hardcore 6 Man Cage Match) If that doesn't sell you on it, maybe this will: Do you like classic brawls? Do you like insanely hot crowds? Do you like high-flying cruiserweight matches? DO you like to see D-Lo Brown do Misawa's over the top rope flip fake-out plancha attack? Do you like to see insane six-man hardcore cage matches? Do you like to see flying elbow smashed off the top of a 18 foot high cage through two, count ‘em, two double stacked tables? Do you like to see Sting wrestle with a intensity not seen since his last days of short blonde haired Sting? Do you like to see REALLY good storyline development leading into a well thought up, well drawn out, and elaborate turn? (No not a WWE hotshot Trish/Jericho turn) A well planned TURN? Would you like to see Shawn Michaels in his prime to the second power, fighting Low-Ki? And would you like to see the GREATEST Tag Team in the world today, fight in a wild brawl that includes lionsaults onto ladders? Well if you like any of that, or if nothing else REALLY good wrestling, then I suggest ordering the replay of last week's NWA-TNA. I honestly urge you to see it. It made me tingle with that feeling of how great wrestling truly can be. So much talent on that one show, it was wild. As well, TNA Recapper Jack Daniels says that Michael Shane sucks, but actually Michael Shane is AMAZING. He's HBK, only about 2 times better. Yes, TWO TIMES better then HBK in.....HIS PRIME! Don't doubt me on this. As well, Low-Ki did kinda put Shane's hands on the rope for him, but uhh, that was because the finish to the match was rushed, because Low-Ki kicks Shane so hard in the back of the head that he is actually knocked OUT. So yea, it ends up as a botched segment, but the match is AMAZING, and its great. Nothing on this show is less then 3 stars, and there is several matches close to 5 stars. Take some of that money you save up every year for Wrestlemania, and ORDER the REPLAY! I can't stress it enough. Umm, wow. Just wow. Then again, she probably thinks that Candido was hot stuff in the ring, too, so her tastes are --- well, odd. -=Mike
Guest Dave O'Neill, Journalist Posted December 24, 2003 Report Posted December 24, 2003 I think its vivcenojimir...whatever his name is
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted December 24, 2003 Report Posted December 24, 2003 This person....must.....be.....Terminated. (Steals a motorcycle and some guns and wears kickass sun glasses.)
SamoaRowe Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Wow... someone actually enjoyed the show and was vocal about it. All the power to her. At least that's better than bitching about how much the show sucks but paying ten bucks for it every week anyways...
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Wow... someone actually enjoyed the show and was vocal about it. All the power to her. At least that's better than bitching about how much the show sucks but paying ten bucks for it every week anyways... So you agree Michael Shane is TWICE AS TALENTED AS HBK IN HIS PRIME? I don't mind people saying it was a good show but..... MICHAEL SHANE ISN'T AS TALENTED AS KAMALA IN HIS PRIME! Ok thats harsh, but by his TNA work, its not far off.
Lil' Bitch Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Jeff Jarrett vs Sting (Non-Title) Talk about a letdown right from the start.
tpww7 Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Kamala was a fucking workhorse.. But that Shane...
Guest Devin Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 I thought this was going to be about Trinity. Then thought it may be about Goldylocks. Boy was I let down to see it was just smarks showing how cool they are by belittling someone for actually enjoying wrestling. I mean, who spends all their time watching and talking about something they enjoy? She is so, like... not elite.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 I thought this was going to be about Trinity. Then thought it may be about Goldylocks. Boy was I let down to see it was just smarks showing how cool they are by belittling someone for actually enjoying wrestling. I mean, who spends all their time watching and talking about something they enjoy? She is so, like... not elite. ::Read my last statement to find out the only reason I think this person is nuts::
SamoaRowe Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Well, Michael Shane is no where near being the second Shawn Michaels but he suffers from Randy Orton syndrome. By that I mean he is no where near as awful as everyone makes him out to be. This "crackhead" has some opinions that are way different from those of your typical smark. What is to say that smarks are any better than marks. Marks seem to only like those who are pushed while smarks seem to like only those who are not pushed.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Well, Michael Shane is no where near being the second Shawn Michaels but he suffers from Randy Orton syndrome. By that I mean he is no where near as awful as everyone makes him out to be. This "crackhead" has some opinions that are way different from those of your typical smark. What is to say that smarks are any better than marks. Marks seem to only like those who are pushed while smarks seem to like only those who are not pushed. I've heard he's had some pretty good matches in RoH, which means we had expectations of something above "Crap", but he just dissapoints every week with bland matches, where he goes threw the same spots every time.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 His good matches were when Paul London strapped him to his back.
syxx2001 Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 Well, Michaels isn't anything spectacular, so whats all of the hoobalajabba about?
Guest Douche Posted December 25, 2003 Report Posted December 25, 2003 As well, TNA Recapper Jack Daniels says that Michael Shane sucks, but actually Michael Shane is AMAZING. He's HBK, only about 2 times better. Yes, TWO TIMES better then HBK in.....HIS PRIME! Don't doubt me on this. As well, Low-Ki did kinda put Shane's hands on the rope for him, but uhh, that was because the finish to the match was rushed, because Low-Ki kicks Shane so hard in the back of the head that he is actually knocked OUT. So yea, it ends up as a botched segment, but the match is AMAZING, and its great. This is not a differing opinion or someone just liking the show. This was worse than a Joey Styles shill. She admits that the segment was botched and that Low-Ki works a crappy style and stiffed him yet calls it FUCKING AMAZING.
Guest MikeSC Posted December 26, 2003 Report Posted December 26, 2003 Wow... someone actually enjoyed the show and was vocal about it. All the power to her. At least that's better than bitching about how much the show sucks but paying ten bucks for it every week anyways... I don't pay for the shows. I get them --- but I don't have to pay for them. As for the comments, if she loved the show, good for her. It didn't blow me away, but it was definitely solid. But Michael Shane twice as good as HBK in his prime? HBK took slugs like Diesel and Sid to good matches. Shane can't work matches with Sabin, Daniels, or Low Ki. -=Mike
Guest JacK Posted December 26, 2003 Report Posted December 26, 2003 Hey, I enjoyed the show, and I'm not on crack; just a whole lotta Blue Curacao. Anyway, it was a good show, and Shane's alright, but X-Division he ain't. One of the better shows I've seen, but I enjoy them all, it's something different I guess. And I thought it was about Goldylocks . . .
Ultimo Dugas Posted December 28, 2003 Report Posted December 28, 2003 Its one thing to enjoy the show, its another to be completely overzealous and say that show was the greatest thing ever. You can tell towards the end of her opinion that she was trying to cover for the shows faults with her enthusiasm.
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted January 7, 2004 Report Posted January 7, 2004 This person....must.....be.....Terminated. (Steals a motorcycle and some guns and wears kickass sun glasses.) ::Puts on Public Enemy T-shirt grabs a handgun and comes with you::
Dr. Zoidberg Posted January 11, 2004 Report Posted January 11, 2004 But Michael Shane twice as good as HBK in his prime? HBK took slugs like Diesel and Sid to good matches. Shane can't work matches with Sabin, Daniels, or Low Ki. Yet Spanky and Paul London BOTH carried him, thus proving my point that Spanky and London are Gods compared to Low Ki and Daniels.
Red Baron Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 a card like that, and it manage to fuck up. Shit and I thought WWE was bad enough
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now