Jump to content

Worst Summerslam Ever...


Which Summerslam sucked the most?  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Summerslam sucked the most?

    • Summerslam 1988 (Mega Powers vs. Mega Bucks)
      5
    • Summerslam 1989 (Hogan/Beefcake vs. Savage/Zeus)
      2
    • Summerslam 1990 (Hogan/Quake; Warrior/Rude)
      4
    • Summerslam 1995 (Diesel vs. Mabel)
      14
    • Summerslam 1996 (Shawn Michaels vs. Vader)
      6
    • Summerslam 1997 (Undertaker vs. Bret Hart)
      0
    • Summerslam 1999 (Austin/Mankind/HHH)
      5
    • Summerslam 2002 (The Rock vs. Brock Lesnar)
      0
    • Summerslam 2003 (EC II; Angle/Brock)
      2
    • Write In Vote
      3


Recommended Posts

Posted
Out of the one's I've seen, I thought last year's was the worst.  I honestly can't remember anything good about the show.

What about Angle/Lesnar?

That was shit compared to Wrestlemania. Good is ***. I think I'd rate Brock/Angle II at ** or so. Just too boring.

I really didn't care much for either match to tell the truth.

Posted
Quiet, you.

 

93 was AWESOME.

 

Explain please because Perfect / Michaels was the ONLY good match on that shitfest.

Posted

I don't get the '95 hate either. I think some people just see Diesel/Mabel at the top of the card and think the rest couldn't have helped it's cause...but Kid/Hakushi was badass (SPACE FLYING TIGER DROP~), Bret got a good match out of Kane/Yankem, and of course the ladder match.

Posted
Quiet, you.

 

93 was AWESOME.

 

Explain please because Perfect / Michaels was the ONLY good match on that shitfest.

Perfect/Michaels was not anywhere near the best match on that card. Steiners/Bodies, the 6 Man, and even Luger/Yoko was better, plus the Bret stuff was certainly more entertaining. Perfect/HBK is one of the biggest letdowns with the most hype that I have ever seen.

Guest Askewniverse
Posted
Quiet, you.

 

93 was AWESOME.

 

Explain please because Perfect / Michaels was the ONLY good match on that shitfest.

In my opinion, SummerSlam '93 is pretty damn good. It's far from being the worst SummerSlam ever. Steiners-Heavenly Bodies was good, the six-man tag was good, the Bret-Lawler-Doink angle rocked, and Luger-Yoko was a watchable main event. I don't see how you can call SummerSlam '93 a "shitfest," but love WM IX.

 

Steiners/Bodies, the 6 Man, and even Luger/Yoko was better

 

*slaps you

Wow, that was a really good post. Seriously, what was the point of posting something like that? If you disagree, that's fine, but posting crap like that doesn't add anything to the discussion.

 

I agree with Kahran. In my opinion, Luger-Yoko was better than HBK-Perfect. Luger-Yoko was surprisingly decent, while HBK-Perfect was a tremendous letdown. The way that HBK-Perfect was hyped, it should have been a ****+ match. In my opinion, it barely reached **. The match never really clicked and HBK's back work on Perfect went nowhere.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I was a little disappointed with last year's, however that gets points from me because I got to go to it.

 

I think the main problem with it, was, it wasn't horrible, but there wasn't much too it. On top of it, Summerslam had a string of awesomeness going on, where it just couldn't compete last year.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...