Guest AndrewisyourHero Report post Posted April 3, 2004 Final WWE Smackdown Rating Posted By Ashish on 04.02.04 Rating drops... WWE Smackdown finished with a 3.2 rating this week, down from a 3.4 last week. The show was preempted in Philadelphia and Atlanta. Credit: PWInsider.com Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest croweater Report post Posted April 3, 2004 Well, it was a relatively crappy show. What I can't understand is that they only have a couple of Major stars on Smackdown (basically UT and Eddie) one isn't even on the show and the other shows up well after the first half of the show ends. Who else are the fans gonna tune into see? Cena? Well, his 4 mins wouldn't have picked up that many viewers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Only The Strong Survive 0 Report post Posted April 3, 2004 As much as i hate to say it, maybe having Triple H on Smackdown! wouldn't have been such a bad idea. I am starting to wonder about Smackdown! being the better show of the two. Yes, it's true that's it treated second-rate, and thusly is left with only what is has, but having a bit of star power on there, even if it involves the whole roster getting buried by politics, is better than what little they have now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted April 3, 2004 Final WWE Smackdown Rating Posted By Ashish on 04.02.04 Rating drops... WWE Smackdown finished with a 3.2 rating this week, down from a 3.4 last week. The show was preempted in Philadelphia and Atlanta. Credit: PWInsider.com Bradshaw DOESN'T equal ratings? This is Mike being shocked by that. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted April 3, 2004 It was preempted in some major markets and the show sucked. No big surprise there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placebo Effect 0 Report post Posted April 3, 2004 Logic entails that there's at least 200,000 people in Philadelphia and Atlanta who would watch WWE. So essentially, to those who like to call WWE for every .2 they drop, shut up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Real F'n Show Report post Posted April 3, 2004 Well I voted for Charlie Haas on the poll at WWE.com, but we all know WWE will stuff the ballot box with Bradshaw votes. I can't beleive the Smackdown rating went down, I mean who DOESN'T want to see Bradshaw in the title picture? Oh wait, I don't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted April 3, 2004 I'm pretty sure one report psoted on 411 (I forgot the source) said it was 4.0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
humongous2002 0 Report post Posted April 3, 2004 And here i thought Bradshaw was a ratings' God. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mulatto Heat Report post Posted April 3, 2004 I'm pretty sure one report psoted on 411 (I forgot the source) said it was 4.0 That was the overnight rating. I think I had this discussion with you last week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted April 3, 2004 I'm pretty sure one report psoted on 411 (I forgot the source) said it was 4.0 That was the overnight rating. I think I had this discussion with you last week. My bad. I just assume the over-night is the final. I'm just use to the way RAW has 1 report: The actual rating. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Internet Warfare 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2004 A 4.0 would've been huge for SM. I think we wouldve made a deal about it if it was 4.0. I'd hate to say it but is Bradshaw really to blame for this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites