Guest AndrewisyourHero Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 Final WWE Smackdown Rating Posted By Ashish on 04.02.04 Rating drops... WWE Smackdown finished with a 3.2 rating this week, down from a 3.4 last week. The show was preempted in Philadelphia and Atlanta. Credit: PWInsider.com
Guest croweater Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 Well, it was a relatively crappy show. What I can't understand is that they only have a couple of Major stars on Smackdown (basically UT and Eddie) one isn't even on the show and the other shows up well after the first half of the show ends. Who else are the fans gonna tune into see? Cena? Well, his 4 mins wouldn't have picked up that many viewers.
Only The Strong Survive Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 As much as i hate to say it, maybe having Triple H on Smackdown! wouldn't have been such a bad idea. I am starting to wonder about Smackdown! being the better show of the two. Yes, it's true that's it treated second-rate, and thusly is left with only what is has, but having a bit of star power on there, even if it involves the whole roster getting buried by politics, is better than what little they have now.
Guest MikeSC Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 Final WWE Smackdown Rating Posted By Ashish on 04.02.04 Rating drops... WWE Smackdown finished with a 3.2 rating this week, down from a 3.4 last week. The show was preempted in Philadelphia and Atlanta. Credit: PWInsider.com Bradshaw DOESN'T equal ratings? This is Mike being shocked by that. -=Mike
AndrewTS Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 It was preempted in some major markets and the show sucked. No big surprise there.
Placebo Effect Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 Logic entails that there's at least 200,000 people in Philadelphia and Atlanta who would watch WWE. So essentially, to those who like to call WWE for every .2 they drop, shut up.
Guest Real F'n Show Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 Well I voted for Charlie Haas on the poll at WWE.com, but we all know WWE will stuff the ballot box with Bradshaw votes. I can't beleive the Smackdown rating went down, I mean who DOESN'T want to see Bradshaw in the title picture? Oh wait, I don't.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 I'm pretty sure one report psoted on 411 (I forgot the source) said it was 4.0
humongous2002 Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 And here i thought Bradshaw was a ratings' God.
Guest Mulatto Heat Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 I'm pretty sure one report psoted on 411 (I forgot the source) said it was 4.0 That was the overnight rating. I think I had this discussion with you last week.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted April 3, 2004 Report Posted April 3, 2004 I'm pretty sure one report psoted on 411 (I forgot the source) said it was 4.0 That was the overnight rating. I think I had this discussion with you last week. My bad. I just assume the over-night is the final. I'm just use to the way RAW has 1 report: The actual rating.
Internet Warfare Posted April 4, 2004 Report Posted April 4, 2004 A 4.0 would've been huge for SM. I think we wouldve made a deal about it if it was 4.0. I'd hate to say it but is Bradshaw really to blame for this?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now