Guest MikeSC Posted October 20, 2004 Report Posted October 20, 2004 Notice that Buchanan has not spoken at the last two GOP Conventions? There is a reason behind that. -=Mike
Guest Olympic Slam Posted October 20, 2004 Report Posted October 20, 2004 Notice that Buchanan has not spoken at the last two GOP Conventions? There is a reason behind that. -=Mike Yeah because he switched his party affiliation from Republican to Reform after the 96' election. Some say Buchanan betrayed the GOP, but some say the Neo-Con agenda of the GOP betrayed Buchanan. Pick your poision
Edwin MacPhisto Posted October 20, 2004 Report Posted October 20, 2004 I only agree with half of the subtitle to this thread.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 20, 2004 Report Posted October 20, 2004 Notice that Buchanan has not spoken at the last two GOP Conventions? There is a reason behind that. -=Mike Yeah because he switched his party affiliation from Republican to Reform after the 96' election. Some say Buchanan betrayed the GOP, but some say the Neo-Con agenda of the GOP betrayed Buchanan. Pick your poision Buchanan is clueless as to the "neocon" agenda --- as is virtually anybody who gripes about it. The GOP wanted no part of him after his disaster of a speech in 1992. He left the GOP because the GOP made it clear they did not want him. -=Mike
Jobber of the Week Posted October 20, 2004 Report Posted October 20, 2004 No, it's pretty easy to gripe about neocons. All someone has to do is watch you at work. I can't believe there's people who feel the need to act as aggressively as they do.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 21, 2004 Report Posted October 21, 2004 No, it's pretty easy to gripe about neocons. All someone has to do is watch you at work. I can't believe there's people who feel the need to act as aggressively as they do. It's easy for you, as being clueless is part of your "gimmick". -=Mike
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now