Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Vitamin X

NFL Week 13

Recommended Posts

Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Again, I'm not trying to say NO SIR THEY CAN NEVER BEAT THE STEELERS because quite frankly, any team can beat any other team on any day.

 

However, with both teams at full strength, every indicator is that the Eagles can't handle the Steelers running game, and their passing game will be stunted by the Steelers' blitz (which it did pretty nicely in the first game) when the Eagles can't run the ball against their stout front seven.

i. The Eagles handled Green Bay's supposedly great running game

ii & iii. Both of those would be alleviated by Brian Westbrook.

 

I really don't know who'd ultimately win. I'd love to see it in the Super Bowl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since Tyler's still here, would you consider the Steelers game tonight a "must win" for homefield? I can certainly see the Pats running the table to end the season (with possibly the Jets and maybe the Bengals being possible threats), putting a possible AFC title game in Gillette.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Dude... it's the Bears.

 

Chad Hutchinson.

I don't buy the first part, but I'll agree with the second part.

 

The Bears aren't great, but surely not pathetically awful (maybe offensively when unless Quinn is running the offense)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X

Seriously, I'd love to see McNabb, Owens, or Westbrook break their leg or neck on another pointless score. That'll show Andy Reid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For homefield advantage, yeah. They'd better win.

 

Like you said, the Pats will probably run the table; the Steelers have to do so as well in order to get to the Super Bowl. I have no confidence in our ability to win AT New England in the AFC Championship game.

 

And I think Plax is inactive for this one, which is a major hit. He opens up that offense significantly, letting Hines spring free. Luckily, we're facing the Jags' secondary, which includes Dewayne Washington.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
They sure as hell didn't handle Pittsburgh's.

Are you related to A MikeSC?

 

Your consistent and stubborn reinteration of viewpoints is extremely frustrating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest El Satanico
Seriously, I'd love to see McNabb, Owens, or Westbrook break their leg or neck on another pointless score. That'll show Andy Reid.

And I hope you break your leg or neck

 

...It's a game...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm rebutting your attempts to make Philly sound invincible. You're completely discounting the fact that the Steelers absolutely put an asswhooping on the Eagles with a shitty, overweight, backup running back just because Bryan Westbrook wasn't completely healthy. Come on, man, that's ridiculous. Your subsidiary claims of "I'm not saying they'll win, but!!!" are completely at odds with your string of posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is silly to say shitty, overweight running back considering he has gone for 100 yards against everyone since that game.

 

OMG, these Packer assholes trying to get cheap points against Philly's defense by going for it on 4th down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X
i. The Eagles handled Green Bay's supposedly great running game

 

Green was still averaging around 6 yards per carry when he was taken out of the game. So that's not quite true, but the running game was nullified by the fact that the defense played so abysmal that there was no way they could take their time to march up the field and score.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's completely the offensive line. Trust me.

 

If you watch the games, you would see that. Bettis is slow to hit the hole and rarely picks up anything after first contact. He's not nearly close to what he used to be; the simple fact that you could drive about two mack trucks through the holes that line makes is the only reason Bettis sniffs 100 yards each game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
I'm rebutting your attempts to make Philly sound invincible. You're completely discounting the fact that the Steelers absolutely put an asswhooping on the Eagles with a shitty, overweight, backup running back just because Bryan Westbrook wasn't completely healthy. Come on, man, that's ridiculous. Your subsidiary claims of "I'm not saying they'll win, but!!!" are completely at odds with your string of posts.

The Steelers put an ass whooping on the Pats, and I doubt you'd say they'd do it again.

 

Westbrook is more important to his offense than Staley is. No doubt. Plus the Steeler's haven't looked nearly as dominant over the past few games as they did against Philly and New England. People are starting to figure them out. So if Philly has looked better and Pitts. has clearly been slowing down; I'd say basing your entire argument on ONE game can be a tad misleading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh's been slowing down because half of their team is injured. That's more than a little disingenuous to claim that teams are "figuring them out" simply because Ben Ro hasn't been putting up 42 points while concurrently losing his top two running backs, his fullback, and his top reciever.

 

I wouldn't argue that they'll blow out New England again simply because of Belicheck, who completely owns Cowher. The Steelers would only win a second matchup in spite of their terrible coaching. Philly, on the other hand, doesn't match up with Pittsburgh well at all on either side of the ball. Their problem is, quite simply, that their defensive front seven is built for speed. They're not built for having a team run the ball down their throat for 60 minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent
Pittsburgh's been slowing down because half of their team is injured. That's more than a little disingenuous to claim that teams are "figuring them out" simply because Ben Ro hasn't been putting up 42 points while concurrently losing his top two running backs, his fullback, and his top reciever.

Really? I'm not exactly the first to claim BenRo has hit the wall. I love BenRo. I do. But he hasn't looked as strong lately as he did when he began. Which two running backs has BenRo lost? I know of Staley. Plax is understandable. Who cares if the starting fullback is injured? So is the Eagles, but no one is griping about that one. Discussing BenRo's productivity has less to do with the points they're putting up, than his high number of being sacked, his 50% completion ratings, and a smidge over 100 yards passing.

 

Anyway this argument is silly. I'm done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haynes had been the second running back all year; Bettis is just the goal line back. Krieder makes that running offense go. After watching the Steelers for the past three years and watching Krieder consistently neutralize the likes of Ray Lewis, it's not hard to surmise that he's pretty damned important to the offense.

 

The Eagles have been going single back for years now, so I don't buy that argument for their side of the game. However, the Steelers mostly run out of offset I, which makes the fullback critical. When he goes down, it hurts the running back significantly.

 

I'm also curious to see if Ben wears gloves tonight. He was dogshit throwing the ball last week, and I have a suspicion that the gloves had something to do with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×