Guest MikeSC Posted March 30, 2005 Report Posted March 30, 2005 No, they recounted it because some on the left bitched and moaned that dimples were votes. So, they counted them as votes AS IF ELECTORAL LAW DID NOT EXIST. It's no different than playing "What if?" -=Mike They recounted the votes to see who would get Florida's electoral votes. That's hardly acting as if electoral law did not exist. So you're saying that the whole month we sat waiting to find out the result of the recount, it was absolutely clear to everyone what the outcome was going to be? And that when the recount was stopped, there was no controversy over it? No, they recounted the votes in a manner completely inconsistent with electoral law (you know, deciding what voters MEANT and all). No, I'm saying that after the recount, the decision was completely clear and clean. Not the case with Gregoire. -=Mike
Vyce Posted March 30, 2005 Report Posted March 30, 2005 Hot damn, and entire page long argument about the semantics of the word "clear."
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now