Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Interesting thing I caught on C-SPAN just now. Hillary Clinton just ripped George Bush--rightfully so--for claiming he'd be a uniter not a divider, strive for unity, reach out across party lines, all that jazz. Why are we supposed to believe Barack Obama, or anyone else, when he says the same old unity shit?

 

For starters, Obama probably won't fill his administration with vindictive hacks like Dick Cheney and Richard Perle or do dumb, divisive shit like invade Iraq or authorize torture/illegal wiretapping.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted
Interesting thing I caught on C-SPAN just now. Hillary Clinton just ripped George Bush--rightfully so--for claiming he'd be a uniter not a divider, strive for unity, reach out across party lines, all that jazz. Why are we supposed to believe Barack Obama, or anyone else, when he says the same old unity shit?

 

For starters, Obama probably won't fill his administration with vindictive hacks like Dick Cheney and Richard Perle or do dumb, divisive shit like invade Iraq or authorize torture/illegal wiretapping.

But it's the same old shit that everyone says. Why do people buy it time after time?

Posted
Interesting thing I caught on C-SPAN just now. Hillary Clinton just ripped George Bush--rightfully so--for claiming he'd be a uniter not a divider, strive for unity, reach out across party lines, all that jazz. Why are we supposed to believe Barack Obama, or anyone else, when he says the same old unity shit?

 

For starters, Obama probably won't fill his administration with vindictive hacks like Dick Cheney and Richard Perle or do dumb, divisive shit like invade Iraq or authorize torture/illegal wiretapping.

But it's the same old shit that everyone says. Why do people buy it time after time?

Do you expect politicians to pledge to be divisive?

Posted
John McCain bustin' out the big guns, trying to turn out the youth vote:

 

mccain_brimley.jpg

 

http://www.yourconcord.com/primaryblog/mcc...answer_to_chuck

I'll just avoid the obvious "Diabeetus" joke and mention he was great in "The Thing"

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted
Interesting thing I caught on C-SPAN just now. Hillary Clinton just ripped George Bush--rightfully so--for claiming he'd be a uniter not a divider, strive for unity, reach out across party lines, all that jazz. Why are we supposed to believe Barack Obama, or anyone else, when he says the same old unity shit?

 

For starters, Obama probably won't fill his administration with vindictive hacks like Dick Cheney and Richard Perle or do dumb, divisive shit like invade Iraq or authorize torture/illegal wiretapping.

But it's the same old shit that everyone says. Why do people buy it time after time?

Do you expect politicians to pledge to be divisive?

No, I expect them to trot out the same lies, and I expect everyone to recognize them as such.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

You're not being very bipartisan, Mr. Mock-Czech-In-My-Subtitle.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

Damn. Got me there. Well, carry on.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

Hahaha. Question in the GOP debate: "why wouldn't you vote for Barack Obama?"

 

I hope they just go "you know what, I don't fuckin' know why not. I would!"

 

Hey, let's make sure to not ask Ron Paul anything.

Posted
Interesting thing I caught on C-SPAN just now. Hillary Clinton just ripped George Bush--rightfully so--for claiming he'd be a uniter not a divider, strive for unity, reach out across party lines, all that jazz. Why are we supposed to believe Barack Obama, or anyone else, when he says the same old unity shit?

 

For starters, Obama probably won't fill his administration with vindictive hacks like Dick Cheney and Richard Perle or do dumb, divisive shit like invade Iraq or authorize torture/illegal wiretapping.

But it's the same old shit that everyone says. Why do people buy it time after time?

Well, George Bush has done a pretty good job of making it easier to buy. Really, he's fucked up so many things that I--and many others--will absolutely swallow anything the opposition party wants to pour for me. It works out nicely here since the opposition happens to like most of the same things I do, but "unity!" works really well these dayys since most recent history has been of the "one-sided mania and national embarrassment!" variety.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

We're citing the same event for different arguments. I'm getting "Bush was full of shit, and so is he" and the rest of the world is getting "Bush is full of shit but he isn't." George Bush's presidency is exactly why any promises of unity are empty rhetoric. I just can't believe so many people are willing to fall for it. He's just a liberal Democrat. He's not reaching out to me. That's bullshit.

Posted

I don't see why George Bush's uniquely awful/divisive tenure as President should be used as an example to prove anything other than the fact that George Bush is/was an awful and divisive President. Just because Obama uses rhetoric that's sort of similar in tone to that used by Bush eight years ago doesn't necessarily mean that he's also going to govern similarly.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

Because that rhetoric is garbage, it always has been, and it always will be, and heretofore, we've recognized this, but for this handsome young baritone, we're buying it, and it baffles me. Well, not "we," because I've never bought into this whole act, not from day one. If the Illinois Republican Party could tell its ass from a hole in the ground and nominate a marginally competent opponent for the Senate seat in '04--we're talking Mike Fucking Ditka here, for Christ's sake--rather than a nutjob like Alan Keyes, this guy would be a fucking footnote. Mike Ditka would've won that race, which is sad but true. He'd take the otherwise reliably conservative votes downstate, the conservative north/northwest/western suburbs, and enough working-class meatballs who would be dumb enough to think Mike Ditka would actually be a good senator.

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

Romney looked terrible. "Guys quit being mean! :("

Guest My Pal, the Tortoise
Posted

Yeah, he's a hell of a guy for sitting through that whole "Ronald Reagan supported amnesty with a fine/a fine is not amnesty" sequence with Rudy and not slapping the taste out of his mouth.

 

Did he get to take a swing at ol' Mitt? The other four did. It's bad enough he's a total whore, but when he had to beg everyone to stop hurting him with mean words, that was pathetic. I halfway felt bad for him.

Posted

The next generation of Romney is scheduled to completely embarass itself in 2048. With claiming to be brainwashed & saying any bullshit imaginable both already taken, Romney III will end up being caught fucking a turtle.


×
×
  • Create New...